Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

I've just joined the forum so by way of an introduction and where I am in this hobby, I'm posting this build of a 6498. It's not a full walkthrough but this forum seems the best place for it.

I usually work on older watches but have been meaning to have a go at one of these for some time and received a 20% discount offer from PayPal so I picked up an ETA6498-1, dial and hands on eBay. The case came from elsewhere. There are loads of people selling these as kits to build your own watch.

This is just about the most basic movement you can buy, with no complications. There are two calibres in the family, the 6497 has the sub second counter opposite the crown so at 9 O’clock and the 6498 sub seconds is at 6 O’clock which I prefer but, the two calibres are very similar with many shared parts. Servicing one of these simple ETAs is probably not a bad way to start. I didn’t do that but, thought it might be nice to work with a new movement for a change and play with the Etachron system.

To the best of my knowledge, these movements come in four grades: Standard; Elabore; Top and Chronometer.  The lower two grades are easy to buy so that's what I have. The top two are not so readily available. It’s big at 36.6 mm diameter so, minimum case size must be 41-42 mm diameter as that’s a case wall of 2 mm only. People use these in cases much bigger than that but, I chose a 42 mm case as my wrist is only 6.75”. Here’s the spec for my grade and a bare movement picture (in its plastic case) next to a very dirty Omega 565 spares movement which is 28 mm diameter.

Manual wind, 46 hour reserve

17 jewel and Incabloc shock protection with Etachron system.

18000 A/h (2.5 Hz) frequency

post-1328-0-49734500-1438619458_thumb.jp

It’s possible to buy these in a foil sealed pack (I think packed with an inert gas) and use straight from that pack but most, like mine, are sold ‘loose packed’ so should be serviced before use. I will do that and also see if I can improve a little on the way it runs straight out of the box. ETA publish a set of service instructions for this calibre with types of oils and an assembly sequence and the pdf is readily available. I more or less follow that assembly sequence.

For the performance, to set a datum, I wound the movement, let it run for a day and then tested the 24H and 0H conditions. The CH, 6H and 9H are the only specified test positions for this calibre but, I tested over all six positions. Results as follows:

Amplitude: max 290 degrees at 0H and min of 220 degrees at 24H.

Six position delta: at both 0H and 24H of 18 seconds.

Beat error under 0.4 milliseconds.

These are pretty good and almost chronometer spec so I will try and get within that, being delta of 12 seconds at 0H and 15 seconds at 24H. On the older Omega movements such as the 5xx series, some are chronometer rated (e.g. 561) and some are not (e.g. 565).  I remember looking at the parts commonality between these some time ago and I’m pretty sure that there were no differences in the critical parts so, those usually will come close to that spec.

On this 6498, the balance and balance spring seem to be the major differences to guarantee chronometer spec for the better movements. Well, I have the cheaper one so, we’ll see.

First is to line up all the big screwdrivers as these started as pocket watch calibres so, all the screws are big for me. Stripped and cleaned, the parts are these and this shows this is a simple movement.

The parts are in seven groups working from the right. This is not a blow by blow account but I took some pictures to show how it goes together. These are all the pieces.

post-1328-0-61527900-1438619504_thumb.jp

1. Plate with balance still mounted.

2. Incablocs and second wheel/cannon pinion.

3. Mainspring, barrel, ratchet wheel, crown wheel, click and barrel bridge.

4. Keyless works.

5. Train wheels and bridge.

6. Pallet fork and bridge.

7. Case clamp screws and hour wheel.

First to go on are the Incablocs. I don’t know what reflection is being picked up on the machined parts of the plate but there is no discolouration at all in reality. For those in the know, I have the curb pins wide open as I am adjusting concentricity and centering of the hairspring between them.  Really, for me to improve this movement performance, I can adjust the wheel shakes and try for the best configuration of the hairspring so, I spent a little time here. No poising of the balance at this time. Nice to have an adjustable stud carrier to set the beat error.

post-1328-0-96456100-1438619545_thumb.jp

This Etachron system is quite clever and it’s pretty new for me. It certainly reduces the amount of hairspring work which is not my favourite. I know it's not universally liked but it seems pretty neat to me.  I end up with a very slight turn on the stud holder after some playing and am happy so, close up the curb pins again for final tweaking when it’s on the timing machine.

 

Second wheel and cannon pinion fitted. Mainspring mounted in barrel and the complete barrel and barrel bridge mounted with its three screws, not forgetting to fit the setting lever screw first (!) which must go in before the bridge. Ratchet wheel, click and crown wheel fitted. It’s quite an attractive finish and the blued screws are a nice contrast.

post-1328-0-88880000-1438619600_thumb.jp

Turning over and the keyless works are fitted. I was a little generous with the grease here.  This side of the plate is not so well finished but will be hidden under the dial so not so critical. Nice that there are holes in the minute wheel to allow the train oiling later.

post-1328-0-12674200-1438619646_thumb.jp

Here the rest of the train is shown, third, fourth and escape wheels.

 

post-1328-0-52630300-1438619683_thumb.jp

And now the train bridge mounted with its two screws. A little bit of wheel shake checking here but, it’s very good.

post-1328-0-88929300-1438619721_thumb.jp

Then the fork and bridge are fitted. That bridge is not the most attractive but it’s usually obscured by the balance. Checked the fork locking and so on here and no adjustment needed.

post-1328-0-31639800-1438619756_thumb.jp

Finally, the balance goes back in and the movement lives again. I let it run for 15 minutes and then removed the balance to oil the pallet jewels with 9415 (out of interest, I'm only using Fixodrop on the escape wheel and pallet jewels). This is an easy job on such a big movement but trickier for me on a very small ladies calibre. I have an Omega 684 in my wife's watch which is about 2/3 of the 565 size.

 

post-1328-0-48424600-1438619792_thumb.jp

After running for 24 hours again, I made some tweaks to the curb pins to equalize the horizontal and vertical running a bit better.  Now, the six position delta is 10 seconds at both 0H and 24H so, I’m very happy with that. This really is a terrific movement for the money in my opinion.

Bit more to follow later with (huge) case, dial etc.

Hope some of this is of interest.

Cheers, Chris

  • Like 10
Posted

What a super presentation, both script and photographs. This will be of great interest and help to many members and visitors to the forum. I'm looking forward to the next instalment already Chris. :)

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks Geo.

A little more. I bought this quite smart case with display back as I liked the crown guards and that it's only 42 mm. It still makes a huge watch as it's all dial.

Anyway, the hands were delivered with C1 lume (the white one which was what I wanted) and the dial with C3. That had to go back which was during their company holidays..... So, thought I'd pressure test the case. It's rated at 50m or 5 bar (75 pounds per square inch, psi) so I tested at 25% above that.

Here with the case above the water and 6.25 bar showing (92 psi).

post-1328-0-82455100-1438630960_thumb.jp

If the watch leaks, then the pressure inside it equalises to 92 psi and when the pressure in this plastic cylinder is decreased, the air will come out of the watch so, before releasing the pressure, it goes into the water.

post-1328-0-14531300-1438630983_thumb.jp

Then, bubbles will be seen. None showed here as the pressure was slowly released so, it seals fine. I forgot that picture.

There is a big problem with these sort of testers. If you drop the pressure quickly and the case has let in that pressure, then you can blow the crystal out submerging your nice rebuilt movement in the water. So, I always test first with an empty case. I've had one crystal blow doing that....

Just thinking of the force involved, this crystal has an area of about 1.5 in2 so, if there was a delta pressure of 92 psi, that would be nearly 140 lb. I usually push old crystals out from behind with my thumb so, they would clearly pop out under a tenth of that force.

Anyway, it's slowly coming together!

Cheers, Chris

  • Like 3
Posted

So, dial arrived and I fitted and cased the movement to discover that the minute hand was a bit long and needed trimming. This case is a little on the small side for this dial. It's a generic dial so has no maker logo and looks a bit strange when the hands are low down. I have a couple of options for that.

post-1328-0-42419100-1439043630_thumb.jp

This is the only display back I have and it's quite interesting.

post-1328-0-78653000-1439043754_thumb.jp

It's a big watch, here next to my Chronostop.

post-1328-0-46044600-1439043834_thumb.jp

I'm going to do something with the dial but it was an interesting exercise and a bit different to what I normally do. I think now that this would have been a good way to start. A nice big simple movement where you end up with your own watch and are not risking anything much or trying to make some movement with a problem work. Will post the final dial when I work out what to do with it.

Cheers, Chris

  • Like 6
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

the pics are enormous, but i can get the gist of the looks of it. $14? very nice price for that.

what movement does it take?

  • Like 1
Posted

the pics are enormous, but i can get the gist of the looks of it. $14? very nice price for that.

what movement does it take?

Made for 6497 and 6498, but I bought this for sea-gull 6498. My primary job will be assemble them with either dialless or brass engraved dial. My own use.

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

Posted

eBay, shop name whx6789. Shipped from Hong Kong. It was actually bid, Don't look item for sale. There are few more sellers from Hong Kong listing same for auction.

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

Posted

Thanks, I also found the case for the ETA 2836 and I'm thinking about it! Only I will need a suitable dial....Did you see the case I'm talking about?

Posted

Stunning Case. I really like those crown protectors. Now, you'll have to post a link to the seller.I'd really like to get one Qof these

  • Like 1
Posted

Stunning Case. I really like those crown protectors. Now, you'll have to post a link to the seller.I'd really like to get one Qof these

Just look at the previous page , I posted link for eBay. Item would have sold/ended. I am sure there will be another list[emoji4]

Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone! I sure this topic has probably been discussed before, but I want some good recommendations based on experience or knowledge about a good affordable high torque DC motor that I can use for my lathe. I have a little lathe but it has the regular old style motor that was used in the past with a foot controller. However, I would like to improve it by buy a nice motor with a speed controller so I don’t have to use my foot. I would like the motor to have really good torque so that even if I run it at a very low speed, it still can cut material easily. I saw online this brand called Servo sewing machine motor with a speed controller, but I don’t know how good they are and if they would work like I would like to for my lathe. Thank you for all the help!
    • Your only partially correct here. Let's look at a magnified view of the image up above. Then for a flat hairspring to function correctly there has to be a little bit of breathing room unfortunately. If you would like Better timekeeping if you get a watch with the over coil hairspring then those regulator pins are supposed to be as tight as possible but still allow the hairspring the slide. With if the pins are opened up at all you'll see a dramatic timing change based on amplitude. So in our example down below initially hairspring is basically free-floating not touching anything the effective length of the hairspring is at the stud. As the amplitude picks up at some point in time they hairspring will just tide should one pin on one swing and the other pin on the other swing. As soon as it does that it changes the effective length to being closer to the regulator pins. As the amplitude picks up more and more it's obviously touching the regulator pins more and more and the length of the hairspring shortens the watch speeds up. This is where in your video at around 16 minutes he opens up the regulator pins and the watch slows down. This is because they hairspring is no longer bouncing off either pin as much. Then because the watches running slow he speeds it up just to show that yes you could regulate the watch but now you have a problem. Because the regulator pins are much farther apart amplitude is going to have a much greater effect. Like in the image down below they hairspring is properly spaced between the pins. But if those pins are farther apart the effect of amplitude will be much greater. So he speeds up the watch to cancel out the effect of the regulator pins at the particular amplitude which was dial down then when he moves the watch to a crown position which will always have an amplitude decrease because the amount of friction on the sides of the pins now the hairspring is not touching the regulator pins as much and the watch dramatically slows down.   Let's look at the other example image. In this particular example they hairspring is actually touching the regulator pin at restWhich means the effective length of the hairspring is at the regulator pin the watch runs fast. As the amplitude picks up hairspring will lift off the PN moving the effective length towards the stud which is why the watches slowing down. As you can see is the amplitude picks up They hairspring is not centered C not getting even timekeeping and the watch is slowing even more down. But at some point in time when the amplitude gets high enough this will depend upon the watch the spacing Excedrin whatever the amplitude is will be balancing actually between the pins in the watch will of course speed up and then at some point time you reach that sweet spot where it's bouncing between the two pins but as you can see it's at a much higher amplitude. So this is why hairspring has to be properly centered between the pins and the pins have to be at the right spacing otherwise you going to get strange timekeeping based on amplitude which no matter what you're going to get a little bit of that as you do have to have a little bit a spacing. At least on a flat hairspring.  
    • My understanding is that In the Etachron system the spring is only centered n order to set the stud angle when the the pins are wide open and the regulator block in at the midway point.  After that the pins are rotated in one direction only so that the width between the spring and one of the studs is 1/2 width of the spring. This results in the spring always being closer to one stud than other one.   
    • The idea is that the spring is centred between the pins when at rest. Then when the watch is running it will oscillate equally between the pins i.e. bounce off one pin then the other, as the hairspring breathes. If the spring is only hitting one pin, then it isn't centred, and most likely the pins are too far apart. Yes, the regulator pins are there to adjust the effective length of the hairspring. The spacing of the regulator pins should not affect the amplitude.  The vertical positions typically have lower amplitude than the horizontal ones. This has nothing to with the regulator - hairspring interaction. Increased friction in the verticals sucks energy from the system and reduces the amplitude. If the amplitude is less, the breathing is less. More tim between the pins = more effective length. Depending on how well the hairspring is centred, and which direction it sags, some vertical positions might run faster than the horizontal ones, and others slower. For example, if the spring is off centre towards on pin, and pressed against it by gravity, it might never bounce off that pin => faster. At the position 180 deg. away, the spring will spend more time in between the pins => slower.
    • Thank you all for the tips and insights. I'm looking carefully at the Sherline lathes with a milling attachment. I need to figure out exactly what I'd need to get in terms of the base lathe and attachments to be able to fabricate basic parts and learn how to fabricate some of the less basic ones- like a cannon pinion. Thank you again.
×
×
  • Create New...