Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Friends, I have serviced Seiko 6319a and Seiko 2906a. I found the lift angles, but what should the amplitude value be? I am reading values between 190 and 200 degrees. Has anyone dealt with these mechanisms? Thanks.

Edited by Cihan
Posted
41 minutes ago, Cihan said:

I have serviced Seiko 6319a and Seiko 2906a. I found the lift angles, but what should the amplitude value be? I am reading values between 190 and 200 degrees. Has anyone dealt with these mechanisms?

What was the watches doing before you service them and it be nice to have numbers beyond timing in one position. Like dial up or down and then crown down for amplitude and if you to picture a timing machine that would be nice?

Seiko typically does not publish their amplitude they did publish it in one of their documents and it's really low. But typically they should do better than what you're seeing there.

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

The Seiko service sheets mention minimum amplitude being 180, which is way too low I feel . Generally after a rebuild, 225-240ish is pretty good. After a few months running they usually settle in the high 240's and can go as high as 270's. in most cases on these Seiko movements.

Posted (edited)

I would agree, Seiko amplitudes do seem a little low compared to their Swiss counterparts. 220° is my baseline when just finished rebuild (not based on any science, just seems to be a reasonable number for them) and as @wudce mentions they do better after everything has had a chance to settle in.

Edited by Waggy
Typo
Posted
34 minutes ago, wudce said:

The Seiko service sheets mention minimum amplitude being 180, which is way too low I feel . Generally after a rebuild, 225-240ish is pretty good. After a few months running they usually settle in the high 240's and can go as high as 270's. in most cases on these Seiko movements.

The 180° is with the watch in a vertical position, this is from the 4006 service sheet. 

image.png.f56c8b0fde49ac6a787a6c2c7d1e1cb6.png

So horizontal, that's probably 210-220° ?

You may think it too low, but they, the designers of the movement don't 🤣

I agree with @wudce and @Waggy  about 220 - 240° is fine for these movements. I've spent a long time trying everything to get some movements higher, but they just don't want to.
I have a couple of higher grade movements (23J Lord Matic Cal 5606) which do get 270-280°, but not the bog-standard movements.

  • Like 1
Posted

I should have said 180 in the vertical position. It's hard to get much better on these older Seiko. Was not long since I did two Seiko 5 with the 6309 movement which both got new mainsprings and both ran in the low 200 in the vertical position. For a 47 year old watch this is not bad.👌

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi Mike I did a ships clock a long while ago, not a Hermle though and without getting the beast in my hands to refresh my memory I can’t recall the timing.  This doesn’t help I know but will start the grey matter turning.
    • Of course it will continue Richard.
    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
    • I think it would rather be the blast of high current drain that would do the damage. But if used occasionally to maybe fix a mainspring or do dial feet it might be worth trying especially if the mainspring or a replacement couldn’t be found.    Tom
×
×
  • Create New...