Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm currently working on this pocket watch movement for a friend. The movement is clearly marked Zenith and 173, but I can't find much information about it, so maybe it's from another manufacturer, or is know by a different Zenith calibre? I'm not having any great difficulties with the service, and I don't need to replace any parts, so an exact identification isn't essential. Nevertheless, I would like to understand what the screw in the red circle is for. Any ideas?

Screwmarked.thumb.jpg.18f0af7420fe88049331e3296e28a7f7.jpg

Movement side with mystery screw marked.

 

DSC03504.thumb.JPG.c66f62347a125c668ea0de4ed50a6cc0.JPG

Dial side and keyless works

Posted

Looks like there are 5 screws holding down the barrel bridge, maybe the one circled is an oversized replacement? if you remove it can you see a recess (countersink) where a smaller screw should go? But... I just found this picture (middle movement) and it seems to have a hole drilled for your screw, is yours the same under the screw?

SAM_3978.jpg.ddae93607cf1455e83fc9d4aa8fa4d90.jpg

Just found another picture here, also showing the screw the same as yous, so bang goes my theory on it being an oversized replacement screw!

1124633-fdd66267d2d1adc837dc4f516240cedb.thumb.jpg.46d21c14404c06b14f8550fd2834a4c9.jpg

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 hours ago, Waggy said:

is yours the same under the screw?

Yes, just a threaded hole, no countersink. The screw is a plain flat-headed screw with no chamfer or shoulder, so not made to fit anywhere else. The threaded hole is so close to the edge of the bridge, it cuts into the bevel, and goes right through, but the screw isn't long enough to reach the mainplate.

Posted

 Shares same bridges with Zenith 106, perhaps with other caliber as well. So could the screw be for spring that holds down the sweep second arbour in place, in some other variant? 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

So could the screw be for spring that holds down the sweep second arbour in place, in some other variant? 

Interesting idea, but I don't believe so.

I checked on Cousins, and sure enough they had a parts list for the 173, with part number 5105 described as the "Vis de soutien du fond, sur pont de barillet" or "Back support screw, on barrel bridge" according to Google Translate. So, maybe I wasn't too far away with my "it doesn't seem to do anything, except add to the overall thickness" remark. Did they put it there to prevent the gold case-back getting squashed in?

  • 7 months later...
Posted

I believe it is a spacer of sorts, it would keep the case-back say or anything from touching or downward pressure and altering the center wheel pivot and/or the regulator since it is also raised, just protection I guess, I have seen this on old Swiss and American movements...

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, CYCLOPS said:

I believe it is a spacer of sorts, it would keep the case-back say or anything from touching or downward pressure and altering the center wheel pivot and/or the regulator since it is also raised, just protection I guess, I have seen this on old Swiss and American movements...

This is it. I've seen it on other calibers (jlc in particular). Back in the day casebacks could be very thin, and this guards against influence on the movement.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well I spoke too soon. Here's where I am now with this issue. I replaced the date jumper and all seemed to function correctly. Fully wound and only in the movement holder, no dial or hands, I let it sit untouched for two days. Both nights it advanced the date. The second night it might have been just shy of fully advanced. Seemed as though I fixed it, so I reassembled the watch. Three nights in a row the date did not advance. Once I pull the crown it does. So you might think that it's the dial interfering, but here's the weird thing. If I advance the date during the day to 11:57p and watch it get to 12:00:30a the date flips with gusto. So here's what I'm thinking and could use your council. I installed a new Swiss mainspring. I used Moebius 8217 braking grease on the barrel walls. It seems to wind quite a bit before slipping, but does slip.  I've read that the 7750 really needs Kluber p125 as a braking grease.  Do you think it just doesn't have enough power after a few to several hours of sitting before the date change? Here are the TG numbers after service:  Rate +1s/d,    Amp 301,    BE 0.0ms   
    • I've managed with the ones I have but 1.8 mm would be better. 
    • Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch. That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch.  With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch. I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it.  The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch.  It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice.  It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them.  Best Regards, Mark
    • I posted a link to another video where he takes it a step further and uses the pins to set and adjust rate as well as positional error.  Alex doesn’t manipulate the stud angle after he pushes it in but I find it makes a difference in the spring concentricity and bend.  Amex also doesn’t use the pin manipulation to adjust positional discrepancies.   
    • Brilliant! Very commendable! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...