Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Another mystery tool of the day chaps. This design is 120 years old, no idea how old this one is that i have. Had it for ages and almost binned it as it doesn't look like much. Then someone posted on another site they had one along with an advert for it. Its open to anyone, tbh i think only the pros will guess it. Only clue i can give is that it used in conjunction with another tool that only the pros will use, although its condition is also a clue. This has to be the most difficult yet. Oh dear i seem to have inadvertently masked out the patent on it, thats a bugger.

20231210_171417.jpg

 

1702229321991275170781294085666.jpg

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Another mystery tool of the day chaps. This design is 120 years old, no idea how old this one is that i have. Had it for ages and almost binned it as it doesn't look like much. Then someone posted on another site they had one along with an advert for it. It’s open to anyone, tbh i think only the pros will guess it. Only clue i can give is that it used in conjunction with another tool that only the pros will use, although its condition is also a clue. This has to be the most difficult yet. Oh dear i seem to have inadvertently masked out the patent on it, thats a bugger.

Setting pallet jewels maybe?

Tom

 

 

 

Posted
59 minutes ago, Marc said:

At a guess I'd say it was for making very fine adjustments to the regulator.

I've been looking for a tool like that forever. I don't think there is one. Or?

  • Haha 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, Marc said:

At a guess I'd say it was for making very fine adjustments to the regulator.

No not to the regulator, Tom was on the right track, its used with this, which I think you will know.

20231109_102300.jpg

1 minute ago, VWatchie said:

I've been looking for a tool like that forever. I don't think there is one. Or?

First one I've seen and I'm a total tool junky. 

Bit of scale added, oh no tweezers fell and obscured that patent again

20231210_212932.jpg

Posted
On 12/10/2023 at 8:58 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

No not to the regulator, Tom was on the right track, its used with this, which I think you will know.

20231109_102300.jpg

First one I've seen and I'm a total tool junky. 

Bit of scale added, oh no tweezers fell and obscured that patent again

20231210_212932.jpg

Did you all give up ?

Posted
36 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Did you all give up ?

Is it for aligning the impulse jewel on the balance rollers to get it in line with the center line of the pallet fork?

Posted
On 12/13/2023 at 6:47 AM, Waggy said:

Is it for aligning the impulse jewel on the balance rollers to get it in line with the center line of the pallet fork?

 

On 12/13/2023 at 6:47 AM, Waggy said:

Is it for aligning the impulse jewel on the balance rollers to get it in line with the center line of the pallet fork?

No not the impulse jewel, Tom was right with setting up the pallet jewels but in a way i haven't seen before. Here is the advert for it from 120 years ago.

Screenshot_20231208-194239_Facebook.jpg

Screenshot_20231208-194246_Facebook.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

No not the impulse jewel

I wonder how many types of tool are out there... probably the number to types of tools outnumbers the number of watches out there. Especially with people like us making their own tools on a daily basis 😆

  • Like 2
Posted
38 minutes ago, Waggy said:

I wonder how many types of tool are out there... probably the number to types of tools outnumbers the number of watches out there. Especially with people like us making their own tools on a daily basis 😆

Its amazing the amount of ideas that pop into your head when looking for a solution. Make this make that, my favourite by far is a micro dimond file from a nine quid dimond plate, i think i could make a hundred from one plate.

  • Like 1
Posted

@Neverenoughwatches, from the news article the complete set is $3+$2.25 = $5.25 in 1905.

Adjusted for inflation, that is around USD 183.18 or GBP 144.69 today. Watchmaker tools cost an arm even back then.

I wonder what "order from your jobber" means?

Posted
10 minutes ago, Zero said:

@Neverenoughwatches, from the news article the complete set is $3+$2.25 = $5.25 in 1905.

Adjusted for inflation, that is around USD 183.18 or GBP 144.69 today. Watchmaker tools cost an arm even back then.

I wonder what "order from your jobber" means?

The patent was issued 1905, the advert i guess a little later. Actually for the depthing tool sounds quite reasonable but for the pallet setter which costs more seems a lot. Maybe its a piece of amazing innovation, I'll let you know when i try it.

  • 3 months later...
Posted
51 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I think I know, I'll let someone else guess first.

I think I know, too.
No riddle for happy owners of vintage tools catalogs 😀

Frank

Posted
1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Lol i got that far, what do hole do they ream that is 4mm ?

They dont look accurate, so i would guess something on the case, stem tube opening

2 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Part of the case, not movement. 

Haha i also got that far.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...