Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'd buy it, but only because I was curious.  It looks rather like somebody found a hand-crafted movement that they really liked - and they wanted to cram it into the first decent (and slightly more modern) case they came across, to both protect it and put it to use.  And then discovered that the doggone pendulum hangs so low that it'll just sit on the bottom and not move.  So they got out some wood gouges and carved a little trough for the pendulum to swing in.  Then they got worried they'd forget how to work the clock so they pasted some hand-written instructions inside.  
But other than that, it looks okay  🙂

Addendum: that movement looks really old, even on closer inspection of the pictures, but with limited clock knowledge I couldn't say how old.  I still think the case is a bit newer, and very likely not originally made for this movement.  It seems like an unhappy marriage.  Poor thing.

Edited by KarlvonKoln
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

I haven't done a competition in long time. So as the headline says. What do you think of this clock. The winner with the best answer wins a peanut. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/115896092912?mkevt=1&mkpid=0&emsid=e11021.m5057.l9429&mkcid=7&ch=osgood&euid=3236060721db4588875f02d6d29f04e4&bu=43419297739&ut=RU&osub=-1~1&crd=20230824013836&segname=11021

What an excellent choice, brilliant and intuitive, I love it, now may I have a peanut?

Posted

It kinda, sorta, looks, almost like what it pretends to  be, but I've seen better reproductions. For example. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/145216604291?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=7101533165274578&mkcid=2&itemid=145216604291&targetid=4585169652812023&device=c&mktype=&googleloc=&poi=&campaignid=412354547&mkgroupid=1305120599331881&rlsatarget=pla-4585169652812023&abcId=9300541&merchantid=87779&msclkid=b06d41843dcc192b07e4256cb967727e

Now I have to be really clear here, am I in line to win a packing peanut or the seed of a subtropical legume? Its important, because I'm allergic to packing peanuts, they bring me out in a cold sweat every time I end up accidentally spilling them all over the floor. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

So you are all coming up with answers some funny. What I want to know is, is it correct and if not what is wrong and what is it called. 

Edited by oldhippy
Posted

Certainly is an odd ball. The movement looks old but the plates are riveted not pinned the pillars look plain although not seen clearly enough to determine. Plain unmarked plate good thickness, ?   Age again unless you get your hands on it for a close inspection I would. Not guess, the escapement cock looks hand made .     The case seems to be over the top for such a movement. And the fact that the case has been altered to accommodate the pendulum and still looks short of any adjustment as the bob looks to be touching the bottom.  Price wise over the top for what looks like a Franken clock.  Indeterminate origin,  not for me . Too many ifs and buts.

Posted
2 hours ago, AndyHull said:

It kinda, sorta, looks, almost like what it pretends to  be, but I've seen better reproductions. For example. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/145216604291?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=7101533165274578&mkcid=2&itemid=145216604291&targetid=4585169652812023&device=c&mktype=&googleloc=&poi=&campaignid=412354547&mkgroupid=1305120599331881&rlsatarget=pla-4585169652812023&abcId=9300541&merchantid=87779&msclkid=b06d41843dcc192b07e4256cb967727e

Now I have to be really clear here, am I in line to win a packing peanut or the seed of a subtropical legume? Its important, because I'm allergic to packing peanuts, they bring me out in a cold sweat every time I end up accidentally spilling them all over the floor. 

I can rarely get the laughing thumbs up to work, and couldn't this time either, but dangit that was funny!!🤣😂😅 I get hostile about it, and they do next to no good in the first place! 

Posted (edited)

Meanwhile I doubt there is any mainspring barrel inside the movement. Could be a weight driven movement from a longcase…

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

There are two winding arbours at the front but only one has a bearing in the back plate! ..? …

The sellers description: „The movement has a false winding hole to the left so that the dial is not uneven in appearance.“

Posted

I did not read the full description  but that leads the thr franken clock theory a n the fact it’s a BITSA not worth that sort of money anyhow. .   Movement probably.  £30.  Case after butchery. A lot less. Not more than £50. All in as is and even that’s being generous.

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, oldhippy said:

So you are all coming up with answers some funny. What I want to know is, is it correct and if not what is wrong and what is it called. 

"is it correct"? - I highly doubt it.  I may not know clocks well, but I know several things about it which are incorrect.
"and if not what is wrong"? - Firstly: the price.  The price seems rather wrong.  Secondly: I'm going to say using sub par woodworking skills and probably also a shoehorn to squeeze this...um...er..."sterling" example of the clockmaker's craft into a much smaller case.  
"and what is it called"? - 'abomination' seems rather harsh.  How about 'travesty'?

 

Edited by KarlvonKoln
  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, KarlvonKoln said:

"and what is it called"? - 'abomination' seems rather harsh.  How about 'travesty'?

In the South we would call it a damned shame

Posted

What we have here is what is known as a Marriage in the trade. That means a clock case and movement that never started out as one. The case and movement have been altered to fit. But this has a slight difference. It is a three parts marriage because the dial never started out to fit the movement this is because of the two winding holes.

1 The case as you can see has part of the bottom cut away to accommodate the length of the pendulum. This tells you right away nether were made to fit each other. The top of the case has been altered, instead of signs of a handle it has had a piece of wood put inside the top you can see the grain doesn’t match.

2. Movement this in unfinished, It is more likely an apprentice piece. It is easy to see the intention was for the end result to be a strike. If it was to be just a timepiece the design of the train would have been different so the winding arbor would have been at 6 o’clock and not at 3.

3 Dial this is a very nice dial and dates around 1760 the hands are also in keeping with the dial. Due to the lack of photos I cannot see how it has been adapted, but I can assure you it has been altered. 

See what I mean by the top.

 

Thanks for participating and I think you all deserve a bag of peanuts each.

Case Top.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted
30 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Anyone who knows about clocks wouldn't buy it. I wouldn't give it house room £300 would be about right. 

That much? It’s not anything good or special in any way, the opposite in my eyes.

 

Tom

Posted

Hi, I have joined today.  Wales UK.  I came to your "competition" late but agree.  I thought from the start an overpriced marriage.  I am no Horologist but do have 40 years experience dealing in the Antique trade.  I have sold a lot of Arts and Crafts period clocks, both long and short.  I had an excellent Horologist John,  and always relied on his skills to service and restore the movements leaving the cases to my skills.  We have both retired now and I have one or two clocks left in my stock that I never got round to finishing and selling.  This is how I came across your site as I was looking to teach myself how to restore a Gothic revival steal and iron large mantel, or more likely sideboard clock with a relatively common French striking movement.  There aren't any Horologists within 50 miles of where I live in Wales.  I have downloaded your instructions for setting up the strike wheels and intend to take out and try to fix the hour hand wheel that has detached from the drive. Here are some pics I took of the case  a few months ago.  I you are interested I can send pics of the movement later.

20230705_191246.jpg

20230704_181737.jpg

20230707_181557.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Certainly in the style of Gothic. I myself do not like the hands, to heavy looking. If you need held with the movement just ask. You will need quite a few tools and a clock mainspring winder to clean and polish the movement properly. At a stage in my horology days I used to advise a well known Antique shop on what to buy at auctions.     

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If at all possible, find a service guide for the automatic movements your work on, because the lubrication procedures may have different requirements or rely on oils you would not use in a manual wind train (in addition to the braking grease you mentioned). Some autos like older Seikos do not have a manual wind option, so the procedure of letting down the mainspring without being able to use the crown may require a screwdriver in the ratchet wheel screw and great care. Do you have an auto movement you were planning to start with?
    • I am an amateur, so there's that. I do not get fixated on amplitude, lift angles, and beat error. However, 4.8ms would bug me if it were my watch. But you must judge your own skills to appreciate the possibility of going backward. I suggest, that you button it up let your friend enjoy the watch for now. As your skills progress, come back to it and correct it. I assume that this watch has a fixed hairspring pin. Some modern watches have an adjustable pin along with adjustable regulator. These are trivial to get in beat. I own a valjoux 726 my dad gave me on my 18th birthday (a looooong time ago). I broke the ratchet wheel with an aggressive wind 4 yrs ago. I have been waiting for my skills to progress before doing a service. I am close. Your advice is well placed and I will apply it.
    • I didn’t find any anomaly to the left of the red mark…reflection? this is the balance in its pivot in the inverted assembly. i can’t see any obvious kinks  and the spring is flat as far as I can see. Either the stud screw is missing, or it’s glued in… I don’t know. I’m loathe to fiddle with it. Any further insights? Thanks!
    • Update!  I've dismantled it, cleaned all the glue off, and rebuilt and lubricated the base movement. I'll leave the chrono part for another day. It's running well - great amplitude and keeping time, but it's got a beat error of 4.8ms.    How important is it to correct this? I'm worried that the potential for making things worse having to take the hairspring off and on repeatedly to adjust this. Would anyone here accept it at that?
    • Since I've been banned from the previous discussion, apparently my language was inappropriate...for small boys. I will start another thread and act in a more decent manner for the girls and ladies of the group.  Please what will happen if the forum can't be managed by the administrator, are there provisions in place to preserve the achived member's questions and answers over the years. Please if I may ask these important questions that are important to the members please.
×
×
  • Create New...