Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Help with balance alignment. Restoring a cal 269 and the balance wheel sits off-center compressing the spring.  The spring itself appears centered.  Is it the wrong balance bridge for the movement?  

20230907_101812.jpg

20230907_101702.jpg

Or is it the wrong balance wheel?  In looking up other balance wheels online they don't have the counter weight screws. 

Posted

That balance cock doesn't look like it matches that hairspring. One of them is wrong. There is no way that stud will fit and keep the hairspring centred. If you reduce the length of the hairspring so it fits, then the timing will massively increase, which infers it is wrong from the start.

Posted
13 hours ago, whathaveidone said:

Help with balance alignment. Restoring a cal 269 and the balance wheel sits off-center compressing the spring.  The spring itself appears centered.  Is it the wrong balance bridge for the movement?  

20230907_101812.jpg

20230907_101702.jpg

Or is it the wrong balance wheel?  In looking up other balance wheels online they don't have the counter weight screws. 

A hs can invariably look like its ok when the balance is not mounted in the cock (top photo) as it isn't under any restriction. The bottom picture look at the bunched up coils near the stud, the hs looks way too big in diameter.  Like a raw spring has been fitted with no adjustment made.

Posted (edited)

You are in the position to find the answer to some of your questions.

The cock is the right one if it fits on the mainplate plus upper&lower jewels  align.

Balance can work if it fits  and roller engages with the fork and escapement escape nicely.

This spring might have the proper strengh to match with the balance at hand.

Screw balance can work even if not the original and original was modern.

 I reinstal this balance/cock assembly on the movement and check if it fits with no problem and properly engages with the fork, next  check how nice the escapement escapes, if alright, you can have tons of fun rebuilding a balance complete out of this existing balance, perhaps with the same spring, cut, repin .... so much fun so you run away fast. 

Regards

 

 

 

 

Edited by Nucejoe
  • Like 1
Posted

Looking at the Ranfft, some versions have a Breguet hairspring. WatchGuy has a pic of a 265 which does have weights on the balance wheel and a Breguet hairspring. 

image.png.7bd37a514f81790f8403c39948783787.png

image.png.2a5b41a7341a9c95426e4cfd16d8bf85.png

  • Like 1
Posted

The shape of the stud holder indicates breguet hairpsring, but Dr ranfft says 269 came with a flat one only.

I did wonder if ;    the cock of a flat and breguet in this family fit on same mainplates, unfortunately couldn't find the answer from julesborel, mizeni didn't help any either, so I think we need to see the calib No as well as an upclose of the regulator arm. 

Balance cock of a flat 269 might fit a variant with overcoil, OP didn't include history of the watch either, so who knows, not a mumbi yet an ebay special perhaps.

 

 

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

The shape of the stud holder indicates breguet hairpsring, but Dr ranfft says 269 came with a flat one only.

I did wonder if ;    the cock of a flat and breguet in this family fit on same mainplates, unfortunately couldn't find the answer from julesborel, mizeni didn't help any either, so I think we need to see the calib No as well as an upclose of the regulator arm. 

Balance cock of a flat 269 might fit a variant with overcoil, OP didn't include history of the watch either, so who knows, not a mumbi yet an ebay special perhaps.

 

 

 

 

What is the difference in shape between a breguet and flat stud holder. 

Posted

Is the stud holder adjustable or fixed ?

Jules Borel lists it as " OME 269 OMEGA NOVOCHOC ADJUSTABLE STUDHOLDER"

If it's fixed, you have the wrong balance cock.

Posted
1 hour ago, RichardHarris123 said:

What is the difference in shape between a breguet and flat stud holder. 

I thought this initially when seeing the post, but sometimes you'd rather not take the risk of looking stupid 😄.  My guess would be set further in and higher up. You're bringing the outer coil in from and up above from the regulator pins instead of at the same level and within the same arc as them .

Posted
20 hours ago, whathaveidone said:

Is it the wrong balance bridge for the movement?

Doesn't anyone find this an odd comment? 

Did anyone notice that I attached the PDF of the parts list for the watch up above? If you look at the Ranfft Watches Website you'll see this watch the 269 is part of the family. Sometimes what happens is people get confused over what exactly that means like my quoted statement above does that mean we can mix and match from all the parts of the family because they're all related?

Perhaps we should look at the parts list I think that might be helpful so I'll just snip out images.

image.png.7d2fd048ee49b435b33e51eddf28e0e3.png

 

Reading the top part of the parts list tells us that the list has the parts unique or different than the base caliber and the base caliber is 260.

One of the minor problems with the Ranfft Watches site Is it Gives us a lot of information but doesn't give us everything which is what's presenting a problem for this discussion. So for instance did you notice something that's titled family/generations:. In other words an evolution in this particular case improvements or changes made over time.

So if we go down the list we get to 268: ring- instead screw balance This tells us that the balance wheel no longer has screws. It doesn't tell us anything else it just tells us the balance wheel has changed with probably still having the over coil hairspring.

Then the next entry 269: flat- instead Breguet-hairspring Another evolution this would be the screwless balance wheel of 268 now has a flat hairspring.

Now let's look at the parts unique to the caliber 269and how does it relate to this discussion?

As you can see a lot of things have changed not just the final change the hairspring. Look at all the new parts we get is that a balance bridge I see in the parts list? Definitely looks like a balance bridge and to go with your shiny new balance bridge we have a stud holder and the regulator pins. In a course to go with that the balance wheel without screws in a flat hairspring.

image.png.05f1d80f3bd19bb828dfc069b3eb77ee.png

1 hour ago, RichardHarris123 said:

What is the difference in shape between a breguet and flat stud holder. 

Conceivably the shape could be identical that's not the difference that were looking for. The breguet Hairspring versus the flat will have the stud and the regulator pins in a very different location.

Now back to my unanswered question of

20 hours ago, whathaveidone said:

Restoring a cal 269

I wonder what that actually means? For instance is somebody mixing and matching parts of the same family because they never bothered to look at the parts list to see what the differences?

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

What is the difference in shape between a breguet and flat stud holder. 

Let me furthure confuse you, though neverenough explained the reason why there different. 

Breguet stud holder and regulator are shorter that the radius of the lower ( main) coil.

whereas stud holder fixed&mobile for flat spring are longer than the main coil.

 

21 hours ago, whathaveidone said:

 Is it the wrong balance bridge for the movement?  

Yes definately the wrong balance COCK  for cal 269.

The question then is, would the cock of a variant for ( breguet overcoil) mount on 269 mainplate?  I did go to online resources for the answer to no avail.

Are you sure its cal 269.

Rgds

 

Edited by Nucejoe
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Let me furthure confuse you, though neverenough explained the reason why there different. 

Breguet stud holder and regulator are shorter that the radius of the lower ( main) coil.

whereas stud holder fixed&mobile for flat spring are longer than the main coil.

 

Yes definately the wrong balance COCK  for cal 269.

The question then is, would the cock of a variant for ( breguet overcoil) mount on 269 mainplate?  I did go to online resources for the answer to no avail.

Are you sure its cal 269.

Rgds

 

Yes, I am CERTAIN this is a 269 - the one thing I got right so far.  in looking closer at the spring I think it is, or was, an overcoil before I adjusted it.  I thought it was bent out of shape.  I'll attempt bending it back to the original.  I'm sure that will end well.  

7 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Doesn't anyone find this an odd comment? 

Did anyone notice that I attached the PDF of the parts list for the watch up above? If you look at the Ranfft Watches Website you'll see this watch the 269 is part of the family. Sometimes what happens is people get confused over what exactly that means like my quoted statement above does that mean we can mix and match from all the parts of the family because they're all related?

Perhaps we should look at the parts list I think that might be helpful so I'll just snip out images.

image.png.7d2fd048ee49b435b33e51eddf28e0e3.png

 

Reading the top part of the parts list tells us that the list has the parts unique or different than the base caliber and the base caliber is 260.

One of the minor problems with the Ranfft Watches site Is it Gives us a lot of information but doesn't give us everything which is what's presenting a problem for this discussion. So for instance did you notice something that's titled family/generations:. In other words an evolution in this particular case improvements or changes made over time.

So if we go down the list we get to 268: ring- instead screw balance This tells us that the balance wheel no longer has screws. It doesn't tell us anything else it just tells us the balance wheel has changed with probably still having the over coil hairspring.

Then the next entry 269: flat- instead Breguet-hairspring Another evolution this would be the screwless balance wheel of 268 now has a flat hairspring.

Now let's look at the parts unique to the caliber 269and how does it relate to this discussion?

As you can see a lot of things have changed not just the final change the hairspring. Look at all the new parts we get is that a balance bridge I see in the parts list? Definitely looks like a balance bridge and to go with your shiny new balance bridge we have a stud holder and the regulator pins. In a course to go with that the balance wheel without screws in a flat hairspring.

image.png.05f1d80f3bd19bb828dfc069b3eb77ee.png

Conceivably the shape could be identical that's not the difference that were looking for. The breguet Hairspring versus the flat will have the stud and the regulator pins in a very different location.

Now back to my unanswered question of

I wonder what that actually means? For instance is somebody mixing and matching parts of the same family because they never bothered to look at the parts list to see what the differences?

 

What does anything really mean, JohnR?  What I actually mean is I purchased the watch off ebay.  Should I have said refurbish?  Repairing?  Practicing?  Please inform so I don't cause so much confusion in the future.  

 

7 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Is the stud holder adjustable or fixed ?

Jules Borel lists it as " OME 269 OMEGA NOVOCHOC ADJUSTABLE STUDHOLDER"

If it's fixed, you have the wrong balance cock.

Stud holder is fixed.  

Posted
19 minutes ago, whathaveidone said:

What does anything really mean, JohnR?  What I actually mean is I purchased the watch off ebay.  Should I have said refurbish?  Repairing?  Practicing?  Please inform so I don't cause so much confusion in the future. 

Don't worry everyone causes confusion in the beginning. One of the ways to avoid initial confusion is picture of the entire watch so we know what you're talking about as we are having confusions over that. I think a picture of the entire watch would answer a lot of questions.

20 minutes ago, whathaveidone said:

Stud holder is fixed.  

If you're new to watch repair this might present a confusion yes the image looks fixed but we really do the image looking straight down because is it fixed I don't think so perhaps we need better pictures?

image.png.38e6fe79910fb41ec98416c2e64c4a3d.png

For better pictures I found a link. Now I can swipe some pictures and yes they came from the link

As you can see in the fuzzy picture I swiped it's a movable stockholder it's not fixed

image.png.22c3872d73a677389a0d71bf5193898f.png

I see he has another picture you can see the hairspring much better it's a flat hairspring with the balance wheel that has no screws plus notice the terminal curve?

image.png.86f240fad314edfa1385db12443f9eeb.png

A little searching online and I found a picture of the balance complete

omega269_1327_1_5f870420-b03a-4006-98ad-baa8d084f9df_580x.jpg.c1b3123e868fc3801786ebe30481ad01.jpg

 

 

https://watchguy.co.uk/service-omega-calibre-269/

 

40 minutes ago, whathaveidone said:

Stud holder is fixed. 

Let's see if I can help with another pictureWe know that this is part of a family so let's drop back to something that does not have a movable stud older like the 266 how does it compare

Omega_266.jpg.b31d485e2ee5a932ade08805b6800287.jpg

Casually they look the same but they're not the non-movable stud holder is usually part of the upper balance bridge it's all one piece Ewers is shaped a little differently and I suspect if you give it a little push it should move although it does look like rust on your hairspring studs screw it could be an issue.

We still have on answered questions though incoming watch from eBay what was its condition like and did you document by taking pictures of it? Because very clearly it's not supposed to have a balance wheel with screws. It now has a flat hairspring and if you flattened and over coil congratulations you did an outstanding job of it because well yes you did a really good job of that now I like to see you put the over coil back I find doing that kind of thing is a real pain in the ass but you still have the wrong balance wheel

one of the unfortunate problems with eBay is and not just eBay which is back to the original condition of Howell was described and sold is if somebody had done some mixing and matching to give you a complete watch so they can sell their complete watch.

 

I found a better picture of the 266 balance bridge as you can see the stud is mounted on the bridge not movable

image.png.eed900178499cb0d5dabc52b6f1b4551.png

Then a better picture of the 269 movable Stud holder which as we will note has been moved.

image.png.e0742dfbf738d3c69a218078f5caee65.png

Posted
1 hour ago, whathaveidone said:

 looking closer at the spring I think it is, or was, an overcoil before I adjusted it.  I thought it was bent out of shape.  I'll attempt bending it back to the original.  I'm sure that will end well.  

Oh what have you done  @whathaveidone , your confidence to reshape it back to the overcoil it was, is admirable.

There are videos and lessons showing how to shape an overcoil, but doing it technically right is kinda advanced. 

Good thing is, you get all the help you need here on WRT forum.

Good luck pal 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 9/8/2023 at 5:55 PM, whathaveidone said:

in looking closer at the spring I think it is, or was, an overcoil before I adjusted it.  I thought it was bent out of shape.

I have to say, if that spring started as an overcoil, you did quite a fine job straightening it out! I'm very curious to see how you make out reshaping it.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

I have to say, if that spring started as an overcoil, you did quite a fine job straightening it out! I'm very curious to see how you make out reshaping it.

Yes that is very impressive hairspring work were seeing isn't it. But if it really was in over coil and he puts it back the way he found it, it still is the wrong balance wheel and hairspring for the watch because this watch needs a balance wheel with no screws and a flat hairspring.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

this watch needs a balance wheel with no screws and a flat hairspring.

John is there a reason TECHNICALLY why its must be a balance with no screws. 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

is there a reason TECHNICALLY why its must be a balance with no screws. 

If you're asking a theoretical question I'm attaching a PDF of what Omega thinks about this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Omega-have-adopted-the-screwless-balance.pdf

9 hours ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

if that spring started as an overcoil

Thinking about that I guess it might help if we had the technical guide. And typically don't find technical guides because most of technical documentation was scanned for the purposes of the parts list.

So for instance if we had the technical guide like the one that's attached what can we learn? There's a reference to these are improved versions of prior watches as in the first paragraph. Then we get a list of the modifications and because typically people don't like to read PDFs I will snip out the important stuff

image.png.bdbe650ce7e6e10da4a9f57a5016a620.png

I've highlighted the interesting modifications and the technical guide talks a little more about those highlighted items like the adjustable stud holder

image.png.b76e2adc4531d3ebeeff02c5ad59fd4f.png

I do find sometimes with Omega because of how well they manufacture things that may be the adjustable stutter holder goes unnoticed. But it is definitely adjustable

then we have the balance wheel and hairspring

image.png.34c636d07ef70b222984609c3c4c1268.png

A rather nice image of 269 and I suppose you could squeeze the balance wheel in there with screws of course it would defeat the whole purpose of the improvements to the watch but I think you'd have a challenge doing it and I don't think on watches when improvements are made I don't think you can Downgrade to a earlier non-improved version and mixing and matching parts. That usually doesn't happen

image.thumb.png.e71b9c34868b1c85e5825d2734e8b436.png

 

 

 

Omega technical guide calibers 269 and 286.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 9/10/2023 at 4:33 AM, ManSkirtBrew said:

I have to say, if that spring started as an overcoil, you did quite a fine job straightening it out! I'm very curious to see how you make out reshaping it.

It's not pretty and probably crazy out of time but it's oscillating. 

20230912_100413.jpg

20230912_100422.jpg

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Typically watch manufacturing companies will purchase parts to their exact specifications including the jewels. This means that typically you may not find an exact generic replacement. I'm attaching a PDF of a book that explains how to replace jewels. Seitz book.pdf
    • Hey everyone! I sure this topic has probably been discussed before, but I want some good recommendations based on experience or knowledge about a good affordable high torque DC motor that I can use for my lathe. I have a little lathe but it has the regular old style motor that was used in the past with a foot controller. However, I would like to improve it by buy a nice motor with a speed controller so I don’t have to use my foot. I would like the motor to have really good torque so that even if I run it at a very low speed, it still can cut material easily. I saw online this brand called Servo sewing machine motor with a speed controller, but I don’t know how good they are and if they would work like I would like to for my lathe. Thank you for all the help!
    • Your only partially correct here. Let's look at a magnified view of the image up above. Then for a flat hairspring to function correctly there has to be a little bit of breathing room unfortunately. If you would like Better timekeeping if you get a watch with the over coil hairspring then those regulator pins are supposed to be as tight as possible but still allow the hairspring the slide. With if the pins are opened up at all you'll see a dramatic timing change based on amplitude. So in our example down below initially hairspring is basically free-floating not touching anything the effective length of the hairspring is at the stud. As the amplitude picks up at some point in time they hairspring will just tide should one pin on one swing and the other pin on the other swing. As soon as it does that it changes the effective length to being closer to the regulator pins. As the amplitude picks up more and more it's obviously touching the regulator pins more and more and the length of the hairspring shortens the watch speeds up. This is where in your video at around 16 minutes he opens up the regulator pins and the watch slows down. This is because they hairspring is no longer bouncing off either pin as much. Then because the watches running slow he speeds it up just to show that yes you could regulate the watch but now you have a problem. Because the regulator pins are much farther apart amplitude is going to have a much greater effect. Like in the image down below they hairspring is properly spaced between the pins. But if those pins are farther apart the effect of amplitude will be much greater. So he speeds up the watch to cancel out the effect of the regulator pins at the particular amplitude which was dial down then when he moves the watch to a crown position which will always have an amplitude decrease because the amount of friction on the sides of the pins now the hairspring is not touching the regulator pins as much and the watch dramatically slows down.   Let's look at the other example image. In this particular example they hairspring is actually touching the regulator pin at restWhich means the effective length of the hairspring is at the regulator pin the watch runs fast. As the amplitude picks up hairspring will lift off the PN moving the effective length towards the stud which is why the watches slowing down. As you can see is the amplitude picks up They hairspring is not centered C not getting even timekeeping and the watch is slowing even more down. But at some point in time when the amplitude gets high enough this will depend upon the watch the spacing Excedrin whatever the amplitude is will be balancing actually between the pins in the watch will of course speed up and then at some point time you reach that sweet spot where it's bouncing between the two pins but as you can see it's at a much higher amplitude. So this is why hairspring has to be properly centered between the pins and the pins have to be at the right spacing otherwise you going to get strange timekeeping based on amplitude which no matter what you're going to get a little bit of that as you do have to have a little bit a spacing. At least on a flat hairspring.  
    • My understanding is that In the Etachron system the spring is only centered n order to set the stud angle when the the pins are wide open and the regulator block in at the midway point.  After that the pins are rotated in one direction only so that the width between the spring and one of the studs is 1/2 width of the spring. This results in the spring always being closer to one stud than other one.   
    • The idea is that the spring is centred between the pins when at rest. Then when the watch is running it will oscillate equally between the pins i.e. bounce off one pin then the other, as the hairspring breathes. If the spring is only hitting one pin, then it isn't centred, and most likely the pins are too far apart. Yes, the regulator pins are there to adjust the effective length of the hairspring. The spacing of the regulator pins should not affect the amplitude.  The vertical positions typically have lower amplitude than the horizontal ones. This has nothing to with the regulator - hairspring interaction. Increased friction in the verticals sucks energy from the system and reduces the amplitude. If the amplitude is less, the breathing is less. More tim between the pins = more effective length. Depending on how well the hairspring is centred, and which direction it sags, some vertical positions might run faster than the horizontal ones, and others slower. For example, if the spring is off centre towards on pin, and pressed against it by gravity, it might never bounce off that pin => faster. At the position 180 deg. away, the spring will spend more time in between the pins => slower.
×
×
  • Create New...