Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am kind of expecting a few "Oh my god what are you doing type comments.... but here we go....)

I have been following advice I have found here and there for cleaning watch parts - with very limited access to chemicals and without the expense of a cleaning machine.

My process has been to put the small parts into little mesh baskets and then put those baskets and the bridges and plates into a sequence of jars which I put in a cheap ultrasonic bath full of warm (50º C) water.  I then separately take balance and pallet forks and just soak them for 20mins or so in lighter fluid before giving them a fast rinse in IPA before putting them in my food drying thing.

Jar 1.  8mins  or 16 mins... deionised water with a few drips of washing up liquid (Zalo)
Jar 2. 5 mins 99.9% Isopropyl Alcohol
Jar 3. 3 mins 99.9% Isopropyl Alcohol

To be honest my results are not great!

So I decided to try adding a prewash to the above list.

Jar 0. 8mins deionised water with a few drops of "Muc Off - Drivechain Degreaser" (This is a water soluble degreaser that I have been using in a 1:9 mix in the same ultrasonic cleaner to clean bicycle chains)

The difference has been night and day - tray of clean parts!
 

IMG_6183.thumb.jpg.486ecd72f72e912db8a4b8fc8f638409.jpg
I also had a balance from another movement that was sticking together and had black gunk on the hair spring - lighter fuel had not done the trick so I thought... why not!

I put it alone in one of the mesh baskets and put it through Jar 0. and then Jar 1. on my cleaning process before taking out the wet hairspring and gave it a quick dip in IPA and then into the food dryer.

Once dry it looked nice and clean - the shellac on the roller jewel looked intact and the watch that I had taken it from that was all over the show on the timegrapher started to produce steady results.

Planning to find a junk pallet fork and put it pure degreaser to see if survives...

  • Like 3
Posted

Hi if it works for you and you are happy with the result great. Take great care over the drying aspect and a frequent check on movements done in this manner for any problems like corrosion or rust ,  I don’t expect there will be any. But just to be sure

Posted
1 minute ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Blackadder, just brilliant. 

And if you buy a bronze watch case and submerge it in yoghurt you can have a watch of the purest green!

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, ColinC said:

Oh my god what are you doing type comments

I like that I think I'll just quote that.

Now that that's out of the way I need to Google something first. My geography isn't the best and it looks like you live in Norway.

 

8 hours ago, ColinC said:

with very limited access to chemicals

So Norway does not let you play with chemicals how sad is a lot of fun things you can do with chemistry both good and bad but without the chemicals well Definitely can present a problem.

8 hours ago, ColinC said:

Jar 0. 8mins deionised water with a few drops of "Muc Off - Drivechain Degreaser" (This is a water soluble degreaser that I have been using in a 1:9 mix in the same ultrasonic cleaner to clean bicycle chains)

Amazon's not being helpful looks like it's premixed you could spray it on and I don't get a material safety sheet. I'm rather curious about the substance that it's made from I'm not suggesting that there are chemicals in there by the way you're not allowed to have chemicals but they still might be in there and it be curious what they're called.

image.png.76a112c5a31b878d7144a3418cfb33f6.png

 

Then I have a suggestion as they do make commercial water-based cleaners why don't you follow the recommendation that they have. You can clean in your water-based cleaner but you do want to rinse off the cleaner with water. You're going right from your cleaning into isopropyl alcohol I would put a water bath in between maybe even two of them then you can go to your alcohol and then to the dryer.

 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)

I feel you, getting access to the proper chemicals in Oslo is not trivial and shipping is expensive! I also started out with jars of White Spirit (the Norwegian kind which, as far as I can tell, is pure naphtha) in the ultrasonic followed by a rinse in IPA. I was also getting poor results, but that might have been due to my weak ultrasonic (from Clas Ohlson, the local equivalent of Harbor Freight).

I have since gone over to the old-school approach using a set of stiff paint brushes and small jars of White Spirit and IPA. You can approach perfection using this method, it all comes down to patience... An added benefit is that you are forced to really scrutinize each part, so spotting bent/broken pivots, damaged wheel teeth etc. becomes that much easier. The ultrasonic is only used for cleaning cases and bracelets these days.

Edited by fellerts
fixed spelling
  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Be careful with the dihydrogen monoxide.

 

2 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Yes. People have died from excessive ingestion of the stuff.

It can also be quite dangerous if inhaled......

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/12/2023 at 3:55 PM, fellerts said:

have since gone over to the old-school approach using a set of stiff paint brushes and small jars of White Spirit and IPA. You can approach perfection using this method, it all comes down to patience... An added benefit is that you are forced to really scrutinize each part, so spotting bent/broken pivots, damaged wheel teeth etc. becomes that much easier. The ultrasonic is only used for cleaning cases and bracelets these days.

Edited Tuesday at 03:56 PM by fellerts

When i feel ocd inclined i like to get personal and hand clean everything. 

Posted

So I just ran a little experiment with the degreaser - Pallet fork 20 mins sitting in the solution undiluted 

Appears to be no damage to the shellac 


Before
IMG_6266.jpg.1919b4a9a037bb9dfd3073a763083efd.jpg

 

After

IMG_6267.jpg.069fb823e14b58d0eb35f7e059600125.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, ColinC said:

So I just ran a little experiment with the degreaser - Pallet fork 20 mins sitting in the solution undiluted 

Appears to be no damage to the shellac 


Before
IMG_6266.jpg.1919b4a9a037bb9dfd3073a763083efd.jpg

 

After

IMG_6267.jpg.069fb823e14b58d0eb35f7e059600125.jpg

 But is there a residue? Watch cleaning is all about being clean. No residue. Because whatever residue remains could react with the microscope amount of lubricant and cause it to spread or other bad stuff. Old high performance watch cleaning machines used 2 rinses to get the cleaning solution off; then 3 became the norm. Now, new gen machines have 4.

 

I remember watching my mom or dad wipe down the counter with a soapy sponge, and be happy it was clean. My little brain was saying "but, there's still soap there!". Maybe that set me on the path of watchmaking. Rinse rinse rinse (and if you want a watch parts account rinse again.... in isopropyl alcohol!!)

  • Like 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

But is there a residue?

In the test case here I didn't really check for residue - I was really checking if the chemicals damaged the shellac and that seems fine.

In the process where I used it as a prewash I am pretty confident that there was no residue left.

But I get what you are saying about more rinses - The degreaser turns the water cloudy in the prewash and you can see that cloudiness get transferred to the first wash - however the next jar appears clear and the 4th jar is looking great.  However if I had expensive cleaning solutions, I can totally see myself adding an extra rinse between the prewash and the wash.

I also know from cleaning bicycle chains that it is important to get the degreaser off otherwise your next round of lubrication will fail. One of the nice things about this degreaser is that it is water soluble and easy to get rid of for due to that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone! I sure this topic has probably been discussed before, but I want some good recommendations based on experience or knowledge about a good affordable high torque DC motor that I can use for my lathe. I have a little lathe but it has the regular old style motor that was used in the past with a foot controller. However, I would like to improve it by buy a nice motor with a speed controller so I don’t have to use my foot. I would like the motor to have really good torque so that even if I run it at a very low speed, it still can cut material easily. I saw online this brand called Servo sewing machine motor with a speed controller, but I don’t know how good they are and if they would work like I would like to for my lathe. Thank you for all the help!
    • Your only partially correct here. Let's look at a magnified view of the image up above. Then for a flat hairspring to function correctly there has to be a little bit of breathing room unfortunately. If you would like Better timekeeping if you get a watch with the over coil hairspring then those regulator pins are supposed to be as tight as possible but still allow the hairspring the slide. With if the pins are opened up at all you'll see a dramatic timing change based on amplitude. So in our example down below initially hairspring is basically free-floating not touching anything the effective length of the hairspring is at the stud. As the amplitude picks up at some point in time they hairspring will just tide should one pin on one swing and the other pin on the other swing. As soon as it does that it changes the effective length to being closer to the regulator pins. As the amplitude picks up more and more it's obviously touching the regulator pins more and more and the length of the hairspring shortens the watch speeds up. This is where in your video at around 16 minutes he opens up the regulator pins and the watch slows down. This is because they hairspring is no longer bouncing off either pin as much. Then because the watches running slow he speeds it up just to show that yes you could regulate the watch but now you have a problem. Because the regulator pins are much farther apart amplitude is going to have a much greater effect. Like in the image down below they hairspring is properly spaced between the pins. But if those pins are farther apart the effect of amplitude will be much greater. So he speeds up the watch to cancel out the effect of the regulator pins at the particular amplitude which was dial down then when he moves the watch to a crown position which will always have an amplitude decrease because the amount of friction on the sides of the pins now the hairspring is not touching the regulator pins as much and the watch dramatically slows down.   Let's look at the other example image. In this particular example they hairspring is actually touching the regulator pin at restWhich means the effective length of the hairspring is at the regulator pin the watch runs fast. As the amplitude picks up hairspring will lift off the PN moving the effective length towards the stud which is why the watches slowing down. As you can see is the amplitude picks up They hairspring is not centered C not getting even timekeeping and the watch is slowing even more down. But at some point in time when the amplitude gets high enough this will depend upon the watch the spacing Excedrin whatever the amplitude is will be balancing actually between the pins in the watch will of course speed up and then at some point time you reach that sweet spot where it's bouncing between the two pins but as you can see it's at a much higher amplitude. So this is why hairspring has to be properly centered between the pins and the pins have to be at the right spacing otherwise you going to get strange timekeeping based on amplitude which no matter what you're going to get a little bit of that as you do have to have a little bit a spacing. At least on a flat hairspring.  
    • My understanding is that In the Etachron system the spring is only centered n order to set the stud angle when the the pins are wide open and the regulator block in at the midway point.  After that the pins are rotated in one direction only so that the width between the spring and one of the studs is 1/2 width of the spring. This results in the spring always being closer to one stud than other one.   
    • The idea is that the spring is centred between the pins when at rest. Then when the watch is running it will oscillate equally between the pins i.e. bounce off one pin then the other, as the hairspring breathes. If the spring is only hitting one pin, then it isn't centred, and most likely the pins are too far apart. Yes, the regulator pins are there to adjust the effective length of the hairspring. The spacing of the regulator pins should not affect the amplitude.  The vertical positions typically have lower amplitude than the horizontal ones. This has nothing to with the regulator - hairspring interaction. Increased friction in the verticals sucks energy from the system and reduces the amplitude. If the amplitude is less, the breathing is less. More tim between the pins = more effective length. Depending on how well the hairspring is centred, and which direction it sags, some vertical positions might run faster than the horizontal ones, and others slower. For example, if the spring is off centre towards on pin, and pressed against it by gravity, it might never bounce off that pin => faster. At the position 180 deg. away, the spring will spend more time in between the pins => slower.
    • Thank you all for the tips and insights. I'm looking carefully at the Sherline lathes with a milling attachment. I need to figure out exactly what I'd need to get in terms of the base lathe and attachments to be able to fabricate basic parts and learn how to fabricate some of the less basic ones- like a cannon pinion. Thank you again.
×
×
  • Create New...