Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Waggy said:

I thought Cartier signed one of the numerals as well  ? Anyway that movement is pretty darn rough

1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I thought Cartier signed one of the numerals as well  ? Anyway that movement is pretty darn rough

No its pretty all darn rough. The tanks I've  ever looked had the backs screwed down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cartier is my thing. - well one of my things anyway.

You're okay with that.

1970's movement - Cartier has been fairly nomadic over the years with who they commissioned to supply their movements.

That's a 1970's women's tank movement made by - I want to say MST but not totally sure. These days they're all made by sellita but they've been round the houses over the years with different ebauche makers.

Couple of examples of the same movement below.

 

 

wqqwqw.jpg

s-l225.jpg

Edited by 316lad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Cartier did use ETA 2512 movements in some watches, the only gold plated cases I know of are from the "Must" collection, which were gold plated silver. These have "Must de Cartier" on the dial, and usually the back, and usually say "argent" on the back, with a hallmark, and the word Vermeil, and "plaque' or 20 microns" or similar. I'm quite sure that they didn't do any other plated cases. Could be wrong, but this one looks fishy to me, poor engraving and dial quality too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 316lad said:

Cartier is my thing. - well one of my things anyway.

You're okay with that.

1970's movement - Cartier has been fairly nomadic over the years with who they commissioned to supply their movements.

That's a 1970's women's tank movement made by - I want to say MST but not totally sure. These days they're all made by sellita but they've been round the houses over the years with different ebauche makers.

Couple of examples of the same movement below.

 

 

wqqwqw.jpg

s-l225.jpg

A serial number on the caseback would be lovely to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

While Cartier did use ETA 2512 movements in some watches, the only gold plated cases I know of are from the "Must" collection, which were gold plated silver. These have "Must de Cartier" on the dial, and usually the back, and usually say "argent" on the back, with a hallmark, and the word Vermeil, and "plaque' or 20 microns" or similar. I'm quite sure that they didn't do any other plated cases. Could be wrong, but this one looks fishy to me, poor engraving and dial quality too.

Plated silver or gold doesn't have hallmarks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Are you @316ladsaying that it's genuine ?

I'll stick my neck out here and say yes, I do.

The dial's a bit iffy but the rest is fine. Not a great era for Cartier - the early 70's - has to be said. Gold/ silver plating (why not solid), etc.

The OP expresses scepticism about the authenticity because one of the numerals isn't signed - usually the "7" as they are these days. Cartier didn't start doing that until about 2004. This is a '70's watch.

That's a bit like someone expressing the same doubt about a Rolex Sub from the '80's - because it doesn't have the laser etched crown on the crystal or the engraving and the serial number on the rehaut.

As I say - it was a low point for Cartier horologically - the early '70's, until they got their mojo back in the early '80's and started producing the iconic re-issue of the SS and gold Santos, etc, and then they were elevated back to where they belong; Watch as pure, beautiful jewellery. Interesting brand over the years.

 

Got a women's Santos on the bench at the moment - you can see the "7" hasn't the vertical Cartier - and this is from 1993.

Nice watch - has seen some abuse. Always tricky to gauge what the customer expects me to do  in terms of Resto. Probably best just to polish it up a bit - you can - the gold bezel IS solid Gold - as are the screws on the bracelet.

So, you see within 15/ 20 years of making the OP's ebay watch - Cartier had got their sh1t back together.

Still a bit of a rubbish movement though - ETA by this time.

IMG_0519.jpg

IMG_1494.jpeg

Edited by 316lad
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 316lad said:

The edges aern't "Crude" they're time worn down.

Take a look at a slightly better example:

https://vintagewatchoutlet.com/products/cartier-tank-manual-wind-18k-gold-electroplated-vintage-1970s-mens-watch-23mm-1

 

Where’s the photo of the back of that watch- or any Carrier tank with an ‘electroplated’ snap back case. I’ve never seen one like that before. If the watch in question is definitively from the 70s there should be pictures of others out there…

now I see the other photos, yes…

Edited by rehajm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 316lad said:

 

The edges aern't "Crude" they're time worn down

 

well, yes. it is similar to the watch in better condition- but both are certainly more crude than the usual design….and worn down bad enough to be that rough but haven't worn through the plating, as has happened on the front corners?

Yowza- imma pass and let someone else enjoy the deal on this one…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rehajm said:

well, yes. it is similar to the watch in better condition- but both are certainly more crude than the usual design….and worn down bad enough to be that rough but haven't worn through the plating, as has happened on the front corners?

Yowza- imma pass and let someone else enjoy the deal on this one…

I think that's a good move but not necessarily because of your scpeticism about it being a fake.

It represents a "dud" period in Cartier horology. Collectors aern't interested in this stuff - neither does it particularly grab the eye - design or build-wise.

If the OP has thoughts about doing some Resto and selling it on - I'd pitch my bid at no more than £500 - though I suspect it will go for far more than that. But that doesn't make it validated.

I adore Cartier - but I wouldn't bother with it - it's representational of dark days - Quartz Crisis was blowing a Hooley, nobody knew what to do, marketing people flapping about, etc. It has nothing to mitigate it's "cheapness" and oppotunism in a dynamically changing Swiss watchmaking industry in crisis.

And Cheap - was never a Cartier selling point anyway.

It would be a pass from me too.

Edited by 316lad
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, 316lad said:

I'm sorry - I can't teach you how to surf the Internet.

I was willing to listen to your opinion because I have read that Cartier produced some pretty average watches in the past.  But please don't question my intelligence, the link you provided only had on photo. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RichardHarris123 said:

I was willing to listen to your opinion because I have read that Cartier produced some pretty average watches in the past.  But please don't question my intelligence, the link you provided only had on photo. 

I'm so sorry if you thought I was - I was questioning my own ability to teach with my own limited intelligence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Are you @316ladsaying that it's genuine ?

The question is what is genuine?  Cartier is essentially known for designing and making jewellery so Cartier didn't make the movement. Cartier cases have serial numbers, there is no serial number so they didn't make the case, and their cases are held together by screws. If they employed another company to make the case , did someone else also make the dial. At best Cartier commissioned someone to make it, so its not really Cartier. There are a few examples on ebay the same as this, not sure if we can use that as evidence for it not to be fake unless we are suggesting only one fake has been made. Surely the Cartier tank is in the top list for most copied and faked watch of all time. Understandably i cant figure out why a world renowned Jeweller would put their name to this.

 

1 hour ago, rehajm said:

Where’s the photo of the back of that watch- or any Carrier tank with an ‘electroplated’ snap back case. I’ve never seen one like that before. If the watch in question is definitively from the 70s there should be pictures of others out there…

now I see the other photos, yes…

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, 316lad said:

I'm so sorry if you thought I was - I was questioning my own ability to teach with my own limited intelligence.

This is a friendly site, every one pitches in and helps each other.  The advanced members must sometimes roll their eyes at the questions we amateurs ask but they do their best. 

I have not come across such a arrogant member as yourself on here before and hopefully I won't do again.  

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • …here’s a factory shim on a supposedly high quality movement…as I said it’s a lovely shim, though…
    • Bending the balance bridge does seem to be an acceptable method as is taught in school and after all the Swiss make a nifty tool. But? Something was bothering me this discussion has gone on for five pages for one watch? One of the things we have to be very careful about when teaching watch repair on a discussion group is our observations of what's going on is based on the posting person making observations. The problem is if the person making observations does not actually grasp 100% what's going on will we become the idiots? so for instance bending the balance bridge why would we do that? Typically if it's been bent by somebody else and were restoring it back to wherever it's supposed to be. Or basically the Swiss are using it to fine tune the end shake. But it appears to be if I'm reading correctly we have a variation of 0.5 mm which is not a minor amount of end shake. this is where when you read five pages of discussion it becomes kind of a confusing mess so I would not recommend bending the balance bridge until we figure out exactly what's going on. So while I'm not a big fan of shimming which is extremely popular with @Nucejoe I do think it's perfectly acceptable until we actually figure out what's going on.
    • ? I don't know what you mean holds the arms ? The internal spring in the spindle should allow it to hold up to the rivet and the hub of the staff. But that means taking off both the collet and the rolle. With a figure of 8 calipers that have the correct nibs fitted you don't need to do that to true a balance wheel. 
    • Hi Richard I get it from master finish.co.uk email *****@*****.tld contact is Nia but sometimes they have no stock so a bit of a wait but it’s not cheap £15 per tin last time but I did buy six so may be more. Dell why does the site hide email address but it is sales at masterfinish co uk
    • I have been recently servicing an Omega 3220A chronograph movement which uses a Dubois Depraz 2000 chrono module.  This has been quite a time consuming project, not necessarily difficult but with lots of steps.  Working on the chrono module is like working on the love child of a hugely complex keyless works and a Timex pin pallet movement. I do have access to a couple of Omega tech sheets and a couple of relevant Youtube videos (including Mark Lovick's Breitling series) so I feel confident that I have all of the required information. The 'tractor' movement (effectively an ETA 2892) had no issues with obtaining 300 degree amplitude dial up / dial down and maybe a spread of 7 seconds across all of the positions.  I serviced the chrono module and when reinstalling it, this brought the amplitude down to about 260 degress with the chrono stopped and 200 with it running.  The Omega specification states that the chrono running should see the amplitude drop by no more than 40 degrees (from, I am guessing, the assembled amplitude i.e. chrono stopped rather than just the bare tractor movement). Obviously this isn't good enough. I am going to have to redo the chrono module again.  Where I suspect I have a problem is inconsistent / over oiling of pivots.  For some reason the Omega technical guide states to apply oil to the bottom pivot of each wheel and then place in the jeweled base plate.  In practice, I managed to smear oil on the horizontal base of the wheel which would be smeared over the outside face of the jewel.  This also wouldn't be helped by dragging the wheel around trying to get the lower pivots to engage in the the jewel.  When I watch Mark service a similar Breitling chrono with DD module, he also oils the bottom pivots and installs the wheels (obviously doing a better job than me!).  My question is, why can't I install the wheels dry and the oil the jewel on the other side of the base plate in the conventional way? The top pivots are oiled through the jewels in the conventional way, so why would the lower pivots be any different? Looking at the those jewels (picture below an example from a different movement) it looks like there isn't an oil well in the outside surface of the jewel around the pivot, so perhaps I would be better applying a drop of oil directly to the jewel hole before installing the wheel?  Perhaps the jewels have different arrangement to conventional jewels because the outside face is installed against the dial side of the tractor movement and we don't want to risk oil migrating from the module to the movement. There are also a couple of friction springs that may have an impact on amplitude, I will recheck their pre-load but these should be OK.  Is there anything else I should look at as a source of friction in the DD module?
×
×
  • Create New...