Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello! Happy horology everyone.

I have worked on a number of movements now: really old, old, new, Chinese, etc., but never came across the shock system shown below. It sorta looks like the offspring of a banjo and a lute. I have also been looking high and low for a regulator as I broke off the pin.

Then I broke off the hairspring stud while removing the balance complet for safe keeping. DOH! There was a fair bit of 'extra' hairspring after the stud, so I may be able to make do with a repair - touchy stuff that.

So, the questions:

  1. What type of shock absorber system is this called? That is really my burning question.
  2. Any thoughts on where to obtain the correct regulator, or a donor movement? I've looked high and low.

I have a beautiful tank style Benrus dial and case to fit the movement if I can get it running.

Best regards - Tom

 

 

FHF_175_anti-shock.JPG

FHF_175_Balance_parts.JPG

Benrus_case_dial_FHF175.JPG

Posted

That configuration is commonly found on Benrus watches using the ETA 930 as the base movement, as seen in the Ranfft database for movements such as the BB4 and CE13:

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Benrus_BB4

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Benrus_CE13

If you can verify the specific base movement, a donor movement should be cheap.  Or maybe you'll find a working spare movement and turn this one into a future donor!

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Geotex said:

That configuration is commonly found on Benrus watches using the ETA 930 as the base movement, as seen in the Ranfft database for movements such as the BB4 and CE13:

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Benrus_BB4

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Benrus_CE13

If you can verify the specific base movement, a donor movement should be cheap.  Or maybe you'll find a working spare movement and turn this one into a future donor!

 

Thank you, I seriously appreciate the reply!

I am still a little confused by "base movement" though. It is a Benrus and is marked FHF 175, should I be looking for an ETA 930?

Also, just for trivia night, is there a specific name for the configuration?

~~Tom

FHF_175_dial_side.JPG

FHF_175_watchmaker_side.JPG

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Look at this, figure 3.

Screenshot_20231013_195320_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20231013_195658_Chrome.jpg

Thank you for your reply. 🙂

Yes, I have looked at that numerous times prior to asking my questions; I am not quite sure what you are getting at.

Do you know what that type of shock system is called? It's not incabloc, it's not dinashock, it's not a KIF system, or Monroe*, so what is it called? 🤔 Inquiring minds want to know!

*- I see now you're from across the pond; Monroe was/is a US chain which installed shocks for cars. Just a poor attempt at humor. 😆

Edited by TKM3RD
Clarification
Posted
1 hour ago, dadistic said:

Thank you for your reply, I appreciate it!

Oooo, that's close, but the part over the jewel is a complete circle, and the end screws down.

What is this tome of knowledge you possess? Where may I be enlightened?

8 hours ago, Geotex said:

That configuration is commonly found on Benrus watches using the ETA 930 as the base movement, as seen in the Ranfft database for movements such as the BB4 and CE13:

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Benrus_BB4

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Benrus_CE13

If you can verify the specific base movement, a donor movement should be cheap.  Or maybe you'll find a working spare movement and turn this one into a future donor!

 

I found a donor searching for Benrus AR1, much to my surprise! 😸

Posted

Bestfit Encyclopedia of watch material. That page was posted here on the forum some time ago. I believe there is a pdf copy on the site somewhere, too. Search around a bit and see what pops up.

 

Cheers!

Posted
On 10/12/2023 at 10:17 PM, TKM3RD said:

Hello! Happy horology everyone.

I have worked on a number of movements now: really old, old, new, Chinese, etc., but never came across the shock system shown below. It sorta looks like the offspring of a banjo and a lute. I have also been looking high and low for a regulator as I broke off the pin.

Then I broke off the hairspring stud while removing the balance complet for safe keeping. DOH! There was a fair bit of 'extra' hairspring after the stud, so I may be able to make do with a repair - touchy stuff that.

So, the questions:

  1. What type of shock absorber system is this called? That is really my burning question.
  2. Any thoughts on where to obtain the correct regulator, or a donor movement? I've looked high and low.

I have a beautiful tank style Benrus dial and case to fit the movement if I can get it running.

Best regards - Tom

 

 

FHF_175_anti-shock.JPG

FHF_175_Balance_parts.JPG

Benrus_case_dial_FHF175.JPG

Are you sure this is a shock spring ? Another way of holding a fixed cap jewel ?

On 10/12/2023 at 10:17 PM, TKM3RD said:

Hello! Happy horology everyone.

I have worked on a number of movements now: really old, old, new, Chinese, etc., but never came across the shock system shown below. It sorta looks like the offspring of a banjo and a lute. I have also been looking high and low for a regulator as I broke off the pin.

Then I broke off the hairspring stud while removing the balance complet for safe keeping. DOH! There was a fair bit of 'extra' hairspring after the stud, so I may be able to make do with a repair - touchy stuff that.

So, the questions:

  1. What type of shock absorber system is this called? That is really my burning question.
  2. Any thoughts on where to obtain the correct regulator, or a donor movement? I've looked high and low.

I have a beautiful tank style Benrus dial and case to fit the movement if I can get it running.

Best regards - Tom

 

 

FHF_175_anti-shock.JPG

FHF_175_Balance_parts.JPG

Benrus_case_dial_FHF175.JPG

Is the spring missing ?

Posted
On 10/14/2023 at 1:10 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Are you sure this is a shock spring ? Another way of holding a fixed cap jewel ?

Is the spring missing ?

Yes. I am fairly sure, although it appears to multitask and also be a way to secure the cap jewel - look closely at the photos and see what you think. I could be totally wrong. I've only been monkeying with movements for about a year, and what I don't know could fill a book. 🤔

The new old movement arrived and seems to be a decent one. After many searches, I hit on AR1 movement. Funny things, watches and the interwebs. 😆

Posted
8 hours ago, TKM3RD said:

Yes. I am fairly sure, although it appears to multitask and also be a way to secure the cap jewel - look closely at the photos and see what you think. I could be totally wrong. I've only been monkeying with movements for about a year, and what I don't know could fill a book. 🤔

The new old movement arrived and seems to be a decent one. After many searches, I hit on AR1 movement. Funny things, watches and the interwebs. 😆

The part you have labelled as a shock spring looks too solid with no flex to it, Richard's example shows clearly a spring shape design. I've also seen others more like yours but with flexible prongs surrounds its internal diameter. What you have suggests that it just clamps down the jewel plate that the jewel is set into. What is on the otherside of it ?

Posted
17 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

The part you have labelled as a shock spring looks too solid with no flex to it, Richard's example shows clearly a spring shape design. I've also seen others more like yours but with flexible prongs surrounds its internal diameter. What you have suggests that it just clamps down the jewel plate that the jewel is set into. What is on the otherside of it ?

What I have is exactly what Richard and Mr. Marchand show in the patent. Thank you for your input, it's appreciated.

Posted
8 hours ago, TKM3RD said:

What I have is exactly what Richard and Mr. Marchand show in the patent. Thank you for your input, it's appreciated.

Maybe I'm missing something but they don't look the same. Yours is solid richard's example has a clear spring design at it's centerScreenshot_20231018-084938_SamsungInternet.thumb.jpg.5c237ef3243a9e75dae62db3747d9454.jpg

Screenshot_20231018-084844_Samsung Internet.jpg

Screenshot_20231018-084735_Samsung Internet.jpg

Posted

Tom, the configuration found in your watch is listed in the product literature as the "Benrus Special" shock absorber, a very early design. Notice that there is a single screw on the end of a thin extended arm holding the jewel in place, so in effect that whole part is the spring. Benrus refined that type of shock mounting in the next generation, which was called the "Endurable" shock mounting. Similar design, but they added two posts on opposite sides of the screw so that sideways motion was eliminated. (I'm sure that was needed, because when I look over old movements with the "Special" design the cap jewel is often misaligned to the side...) The Endurable also had cutouts around the jewel to add more flexibility, and that appears to be the product that actually arose from the patent Richard provided above, although the posts have been rotated 90 degrees from the patent diagram.  See the Benrus technical catalog listing of their shock systems and part of the Endurable service document below. 

Benrusshock.thumb.jpeg.55a076a1ffec7c9eed50e7d1ab13ea88.jpeg endurable.thumb.jpeg.f7b7b92b36952538f5db8494d5dc93cc.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Geotex said:

Tom, the configuration found in your watch is listed in the product literature as the "Benrus Special" shock absorber, a very early design. Notice that there is a single screw on the end of a thin extended arm holding the jewel in place, so in effect that whole part is the spring. Benrus refined that type of shock mounting in the next generation, which was called the "Endurable" shock mounting. Similar design, but they added two posts on opposite sides of the screw so that sideways motion was eliminated. (I'm sure that was needed, because when I look over old movements with the "Special" design the cap jewel is often misaligned to the side...) The Endurable also had cutouts around the jewel to add more flexibility, and that appears to be the product that actually arose from the patent Richard provided above, although the posts have been rotated 90 degrees from the patent diagram.  See the Benrus technical catalog listing of their shock systems and part of the Endurable service document below. 

Benrusshock.thumb.jpeg.55a076a1ffec7c9eed50e7d1ab13ea88.jpeg endurable.thumb.jpeg.f7b7b92b36952538f5db8494d5dc93cc.jpeg

Thanks Geotex, that clears it  up wonderfully .

Posted

Thank you, everyone, for the feedback and wonderful bit of history and learning! This is such a fascinating hobby, albeit a complex one. It's so much appreciated to have such help here.

Thank you all again! Until next time, best regards,

~~Tom

Posted

Well, it was admittedly an imperfect system. Initially there was just a standard cap jewel on the dial side of the balance, but later versions used a cutout cap setting that potentially allowed some flexibility on that side as well. See the two version in the photo. 

IMG_2191.jpeg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tool for removing or pressing the bezel? Most likely you have to remove the bezel (with a knife) before removing old crystal or inserting a new one. You can press the bezel with the crystal press if you have a suitable die with straight walls or otherwise a die that has enough clearance that it doesn't touch the crystal when pressing the bezel.
    • This will be my first crystal replacement, I have a press, but looking at the watch I wonder if I might need a bezel tool also. Any and all help appreciated. 
    • I'm not entirely sure you fully understand what he's doing in the video. For one thing he's giving examples of things like about 16 minutes he talks about opening up the regulator just a little bit. Opening up the regulator slows the watch down to compensate for that he moves the regulator fast and now it's keeping time again but the regulator pins are too far apart. I have an image down below on top of it shows the effect of regulator pins and amplitude. If the regulator pins are farther apart than the example down below then at a higher amplitude timekeeping will be much worse. Why the regulator pins are supposed to be adjusted as an average rule approximately twice the thickness of the mainspring itself. In other words if you look at the spacing it have one half of the hairspring thickness on either side of the hairspring itself. There is like he talks about the video a little bit of adjustment here and there. So in his example where he opened them up it will really dramatically screw up timekeeping based on amplitude. Then when you get to the 20 some minutes like you say he is adjusting the regulator pins closer together to get a more even timekeeping based on amplitude and amplitude changes are caused by going to various positions. Then and the other example of the image down below regulator pins too far apart and they hairspring is not centered and look what that does the timekeeping. So hairspring is supposed to be centered regulator pins are supposed to properly spaced. Then you get reasonably even timekeeping like it shows in the upper image. It's not like we're regulating out positional errors like poising errors because that's something entirely different.   In the part number above and in the video both of you left off details. I which version of either of your watches I will just make you's timing specifications for your watch down below may specify how you're supposed to do it other words you wind up the watch fully wound up you wait 10 to 60 minutes in the four positions it should be within 60 seconds. Yes it can be closer but you may not actually get zero.     Now let's compare with the 2892 and see where we might have a discrepancy. First off we have a problem of which one is a using did he use the chronometer grade 1 or the top grade or what?  None is basically just much tighter timing tolerances. So when he's using an example watch conceivably might be a chronometer grade watch then things are going to be much more  perfect than what you're going to see.       NH35_TG.pdf ETA 2892-A2 Manufacturing info.pdf
    • Note the 8992 is 850 pounds for a liter. I think this is really for industrial settings like they say, where it would be used as a final bath in a 20,000 buck cleaning machine. I use the 8981.   That is excellent- I don't often get to see a serviced watch 5 years later, but when I do I expect to see pretty much the same oiling on the balance jewels as when it went out. I think at that area, being essentially sealed, it really should remain fairly pristine for likely 10 years. It's why some makers go to the trouble to use cap jewels on the escape wheel as well- not so much for friction reduction, but to keep the oil longer where it really counts.
×
×
  • Create New...