Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

 I'm glad i only paid a fiver for it then ! ( wait for it,  OH is about to say # thats a fiver too much # ) OH i can read you like a book 🤣🤣🤣

Its your money. I know what I would sooner have £5

  • Haha 1
Posted

OK, can You show pictures? Of the plates and the lever. 

Something important: being that much carefull is close to indecisiveness, and this prevents from making the things happen.

Another - The thing that really wears in this kind of movements is the tips of the balance staff. Did You sharpened them? Did You do the free oscillations test?

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Its your money. I know what I would sooner have £5

A fiver doesn't get you much these days OH, de carle isn't all i have, I'm working my way through them one at a time,  i think Fried was better, Gazeley yet to read. Do you have any suggestions on who to follow ?

5 hours ago, nevenbekriev said:

OK, can You show pictures? Of the plates and the lever. 

Something important: being that much carefull is close to indecisiveness, and this prevents from making the things happen.

Another - The thing that really wears in this kind of movements is the tips of the balance staff. Did You sharpened them? Did You do the free oscillations test?

 Sharpen them ? this is where our different terminology can get in the way, we would say to burnish them or to polish them, or to dress the pivot ends to the correct shape. The pivots are good, its a new staff and look ok to me. The balance by itself oscillates very well, around 90-120 seconds to a standstill with a good puff of air from a blower and the train is very free with a couple of seconds kick back of the esc wheel. The escapement seems to be locking ok now after polishing out some light scratches of the lever pins. I am now in the process of polishing the locking and impulse faces of the escape wheel in hope of some extra amplitude also the impulse pin. 

20231024_184558.jpg

20231024_184546.jpg

20231024_184647.jpg

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted

OK, sharpening is for the movements where the balance staff has cone shaped tips and the bearings are steel cup bearings, just like in the alarm clocks. This type is the movement in D-r Ranfr database, where I got the picture that I showed. I see now that in You case, there is balance staff with normal pivots and jeweled bearings, which is good. Do I see removable bushes bearings for the lever and 'scape wheel?

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, nevenbekriev said:

OK, sharpening is for the movements where the balance staff has cone shaped tips and the bearings are steel cup bearings, just like in the alarm clocks. This type is the movement in D-r Ranfr database, where I got the picture that I showed. I see now that in You case, there is balance staff with normal pivots and jeweled bearings, which is good. Do I see removable bushes bearings for the lever and 'scape wheel?

Yes nev brass bushings for lever and escape, but there is very little wear in them. I'm very suspicious that this watch was not worn very much, and thinking it was damaged early on in its life with an attempted service or a tinkerer lost patience with it many years ago because it didn't run well. There was some damage and missing parts but little wear. Esc wheel teeth now polished up with polinum and a hard sponge dial cleaner. The black block is two pieces of foam insulation with escape wheel sandwiched between them and duck taped together ( Mr. De Carle eat your heart out 🤣 ). Time to put it back together and see how it runs.

20231024_202506.jpg

20231024_203058.jpg

20231024_203417.jpg

20231024_203617.jpg

20231024_203653.jpg

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted (edited)

I see.

It seems the wheel is made of brass, is it?

My expirience is that polishing brass parts where friction happens like bearings and escapement teeth doesn't bring any good. Burnishing helps beter. But both ways the shape of teeth can be changed, and this change can decrease the ability of the escapement to lock. For this escapement it is essential that the angle formed by the impulse and rest surfaces on all the teeth is sharp and not rounded and the proper angle of the rest surface is not changed by wear on the place where drop of the pin ocurs. If one needs to restore the wheel in a manner that will increase the locking, he must not touch the impulse surfaces, but he should work only on the rest surfaces.

The other thing is the pins itself. They wear and they wear much more when surface of the brass teeth is charged with abrasive particles by the dust around or from polishing the teeth with abrasives. The wear of the pins decreases the locking. Pins can be changed, shifted, turned around or upside down, the body of the lever can be shifted on the staff, the table of the wheel can be shifted on the pinion - all this will solve the pins wear problem. But this is in the alarm clocks where everything is big. In You case the easiest way is to change a little the position of the wheel in high by bending it's spockets. This is only if significant wear of the pins is seen. Pins usually are so hardened that they will rather snap than bend

In You movement there is no way to adjust the escapement, so only the acuracy of manufacturing is the thing that can guarantee normal performance. If there is no significant wear and still the escapement doesn't lock correctly, then may be someone has changed part(s) of it in the past. And, if the locking is the problem, then I think it should be solved now by moving the escape wheel towards the lever. This means that the bushes of the wheel bearings must be replaced by probes with no holes, the correct distance between the wheel and the lever must be determinated by the help of depthing tool and arcs with bearings of the lever as center must be drown on the probes, Then another arcs with the bearings of the 4th wheel as center and the proper radius must be drown, thus determining the places of the new holes

Edited by nevenbekriev
  • Like 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, nevenbekriev said:

I see.

It seems the wheel is made of brass, is it?

My expirience is that polishing brass parts where friction happens like bearings and escapement teeth doesn't bring any good. Burnishing helps beter. But both ways the shape of teeth can be changed, and this change can decrease the ability of the escapement to lock. For this escapement it is essential that the angle formed by the impulse and rest surfaces on all the teeth is sharp and not rounded and the proper angle of the rest surface is not changed by wear on the place where drop of the pin ocurs. If one needs to restore the wheel in a manner that will increase the locking, he must not touch the impulse surfaces, but he should work only on the rest surfaces.

The other thing is the pins itself. They wear and they wear mych more when surface of the brass teeth is charged with abrasive particles by the dust around or from polishing the teeth with abrasives. The wear of the pins decreases the locking. Pins can be changed, shifted, turned around or upside down, the body of the lever can be shifted on the staff, the table of the wheel can be shifted on the pinion - all this will solve the pins wear problem. But this is in the alarm clocks where everything is big. In You case the easiest way is to change a little the position of the wheel in high by bendinf it's spockets. This is only if significant wear of the pins is seen. Pins usually are so hardened that they will rather snap than bend

In You movement there is no way to adjust the escapement, so only the acuracy of manufacturing is the thing that can guarantee normal performance. If there is no significant wear and still the escapement doesn't lock correctly, then may be someone has changed part(s) of it in the past. And, if the locking is the problem, then I think it should be solved now by moving the escape wheel towards the lever. This means that the bushes of the wheel bearings must be replaced by probes with no holes, the correct distance between the wheel and the lever must be determinated by the help of depthing tool and arcs with bearings of the lever as center must be drown on the probes, Then another arcs with the bearings of the 4th wheel as center and the proper radius must be drown, thus determining the places of the new holes

Thanks for your advice nev, i have yet to see how it runs. The polish used was polinum,  which has a really fine cut so hopefully the teeth geometry hasn't been changed. I understand what you are saying about charging the teeth with abrasive, that was a risk i was prepared to take. Its something of an experiment, the impulse faces were dull, that suggested to me there would be extra friction that i could reduce. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tool for removing or pressing the bezel? Most likely you have to remove the bezel (with a knife) before removing old crystal or inserting a new one. You can press the bezel with the crystal press if you have a suitable die with straight walls or otherwise a die that has enough clearance that it doesn't touch the crystal when pressing the bezel.
    • This will be my first crystal replacement, I have a press, but looking at the watch I wonder if I might need a bezel tool also. Any and all help appreciated. 
    • I'm not entirely sure you fully understand what he's doing in the video. For one thing he's giving examples of things like about 16 minutes he talks about opening up the regulator just a little bit. Opening up the regulator slows the watch down to compensate for that he moves the regulator fast and now it's keeping time again but the regulator pins are too far apart. I have an image down below on top of it shows the effect of regulator pins and amplitude. If the regulator pins are farther apart than the example down below then at a higher amplitude timekeeping will be much worse. Why the regulator pins are supposed to be adjusted as an average rule approximately twice the thickness of the mainspring itself. In other words if you look at the spacing it have one half of the hairspring thickness on either side of the hairspring itself. There is like he talks about the video a little bit of adjustment here and there. So in his example where he opened them up it will really dramatically screw up timekeeping based on amplitude. Then when you get to the 20 some minutes like you say he is adjusting the regulator pins closer together to get a more even timekeeping based on amplitude and amplitude changes are caused by going to various positions. Then and the other example of the image down below regulator pins too far apart and they hairspring is not centered and look what that does the timekeeping. So hairspring is supposed to be centered regulator pins are supposed to properly spaced. Then you get reasonably even timekeeping like it shows in the upper image. It's not like we're regulating out positional errors like poising errors because that's something entirely different.   In the part number above and in the video both of you left off details. I which version of either of your watches I will just make you's timing specifications for your watch down below may specify how you're supposed to do it other words you wind up the watch fully wound up you wait 10 to 60 minutes in the four positions it should be within 60 seconds. Yes it can be closer but you may not actually get zero.     Now let's compare with the 2892 and see where we might have a discrepancy. First off we have a problem of which one is a using did he use the chronometer grade 1 or the top grade or what?  None is basically just much tighter timing tolerances. So when he's using an example watch conceivably might be a chronometer grade watch then things are going to be much more  perfect than what you're going to see.       NH35_TG.pdf ETA 2892-A2 Manufacturing info.pdf
    • Note the 8992 is 850 pounds for a liter. I think this is really for industrial settings like they say, where it would be used as a final bath in a 20,000 buck cleaning machine. I use the 8981.   That is excellent- I don't often get to see a serviced watch 5 years later, but when I do I expect to see pretty much the same oiling on the balance jewels as when it went out. I think at that area, being essentially sealed, it really should remain fairly pristine for likely 10 years. It's why some makers go to the trouble to use cap jewels on the escape wheel as well- not so much for friction reduction, but to keep the oil longer where it really counts.
×
×
  • Create New...