Jump to content

Timegrapher Question - Jumping Line


Recommended Posts

Greetings! Excited to join the Forums. 
I have been a watch enthusiast for years but just started learning watch repairing recently. So I guess here is the right place for me to ask newbie’s questions.

I have an affordable timegrapher, Weishi 1900. I check my own watches periodically using this machine, and also use it for watch repair exercises of course. I have seen wavy lines, full screen of scattered dots and a couple of other patterns on my timegrapher, but I never understood this pattern(picture attached below).IMG_9869.thumb.jpeg.c934975878784cc0c896c6ba11ed8100.jpeg

You probably already noticed, one of the two lines is jumping up and down. The “dropped dots” almost formed a third line. I am so confused what does this pattern indicate?

A bit additional info, this watch is one of those that I put on timegrapher from time to time. And I haven’t seen this kind of reading on this watch before. Also, the reading was totally fine when the watch was on dial up position when I checked a few minutes ago(picture attached below). I have realized that the weird jump line only appears when the watch is on vertical positions(crown right and crown down mostly).IMG_9868.thumb.jpeg.d7e6b1506cef0f4382797d98a9267dd0.jpeg

Any idea will be appreciated! Hopefully this question isn’t stupid:-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Kalanag said:

…or this?

Could be, but the amplitude is only 230° when it is happening which is why I didn't flag it as the prime suspect, and gravity seems to be influencing it, which is why I homed in on the balance system. However, you could well be right and this is certainly worth looking at as part of the troubleshooting process. 👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kalanag said:

That looks to be an additional noise as the 2 traces from the escapement are complete.  Whereas on justin's the pattern is being pulled from entry jewel trace, like the oscillations are unequal at different points.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/5/2023 at 5:58 AM, JustinM said:

Greetings! Excited to join the Forums. 
I have been a watch enthusiast for years but just started learning watch repairing recently. So I guess here is the right place for me to ask newbie’s questions.

I have an affordable timegrapher, Weishi 1900. I check my own watches periodically using this machine, and also use it for watch repair exercises of course. I have seen wavy lines, full screen of scattered dots and a couple of other patterns on my timegrapher, but I never understood this pattern(picture attached below).IMG_9869.thumb.jpeg.c934975878784cc0c896c6ba11ed8100.jpeg

You probably already noticed, one of the two lines is jumping up and down. The “dropped dots” almost formed a third line. I am so confused what does this pattern indicate?

A bit additional info, this watch is one of those that I put on timegrapher from time to time. And I haven’t seen this kind of reading on this watch before. Also, the reading was totally fine when the watch was on dial up position when I checked a few minutes ago(picture attached below). I have realized that the weird jump line only appears when the watch is on vertical positions(crown right and crown down mostly).IMG_9868.thumb.jpeg.d7e6b1506cef0f4382797d98a9267dd0.jpeg

Any idea will be appreciated! Hopefully this question isn’t stupid:-)

If the bad trace is from a vertical position , could it be a poising issue ? the beat error is occasionally jumping way up almost to an overlap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This question was asked multiple times here …

Reason is usually a faint 1st pulse of the tic noise that is missed by the TM now and then. The TM will fetch and print the next higher pulse (usually 3 in one tic noise). 

This can mean an escapement issue (e.g. too small drop lock) but most times just an audio issue, the TM has problems to recognize a quiet pulse #1.

It is not a touching hairspring (random dots!).

It is not knocking (which in real looks very different from the posted picture).

Frank

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, praezis said:

This question was asked multiple times here …

Reason is usually a faint 1st pulse of the tic noise that is missed by the TM now and then. The TM will fetch and print the next higher pulse (usually 3 in one tic noise). 

This can mean an escapement issue (e.g. too small drop lock) but most times just an audio issue, the TM has problems to recognize a quiet pulse #1.

It is not a touching hairspring (random dots!).

It is not knocking (which in real looks very different from the posted picture).

Frank

 

@JustinMBased on Frank's advice I wonder if you can tune out this anomaly by adjusting the gain?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/7/2023 at 5:17 AM, praezis said:

Reason is usually a faint 1st pulse of the tic noise that is missed by the TM now and then. The TM will fetch and print the next higher pulse (usually 3 in one tic noise). 

Yes the problems of getting a nice clean signal and what happens if you do not.

For instance starting with the basics of fuzzy picture but do I see the crown the facing in the wrong direction? It doesn't always work that usually the crown should face the other way as you can get a better signal sometimes

image.png.cc9ac0e51f18d7bd1967a5576e6d3ec1.png

For instance something out of the PDF found below

image.png.702469d19cd33b5a491234f0f4b59feb.png

 

One of the problems with timing watches in a case is depending upon how heavy the case is or how the watches mounted in the case of a lot of times you will not get a clean signal and no get peculiar results. It also depends upon the particular timing machine and or device and how well it processes's.

For instance I find the very expensive witschi machine at work sometimes doesn't like Seiko watches or even or a heavy Rolex watch. Fortunately it has in our oscilloscope so I can look and see where it thinks the signals are supposed to be and I can see what I'm getting goofy results.

Sometimes if you're really concerned it would be best to remove the movement from the case and find that everything is probably just fine. Or if you're servicing a watch this is why you'd like to ideally evaluate the watch before you even put the hands Dial and definitely before it gets in the case. Just to make sure you're not having any problems before it's all case top be surprised.

 

8643_WI_81 BASIC CHECKS AND SETTINGS OF A MECHANICAL WATCH_EN cousins UK.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
    • yes the advertising revenue should generate money. The question is how much money? Then as far as the cost of the website goes that's relatively easy to determine? all you would have to do to grasp costs and profitability would be to go to the link below and you can actually get a website for free try it out for free I believe you get no advertising initially. They also talk about that they'll help you out they have marketing tools and some sort of paid subscription or something. So I guess were shopping for a whatever just ask them what would a maybe could use this one as an example in other words it's going to look basically identical to this is going to have advertising a paid subscriptions what's it going to cost? After all they want to sell or give us a message board like this they should bill answer the questions as they're the people who did the software for this. Yes they really said you can have a free discussion group at least to start. https://invisioncommunity.com/ I was curious about the monthly supporter thing where exactly do we find that on this message board? A quick search I'm not finding it so obviously I'm not looking in the right place?
    • Help me out here, but with all the advertising on this site (which I don't mind) wouldn't it pay for itself or even make money for the owner ???
×
×
  • Create New...