Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys, I'm hoping you can help.

I have a lovely Military ATP Lemania on the bench. Has a Tissot Tissot 27A (none shock protection) movement.

It runs for a few hours. Very very low amplitude. The first coil of the balance spring is touching the teeth of the 2nd wheel. The other coils are below the 2nd wheel. I saw immediately that the spring has been bent and maybe tried to be corrected at some point. See attached image of the watch, you should be able to see. 

I removed the balance complete and removed the balance. I can see the spring is quite poorly shaped. Also there is a brass pin as well as a stud, never seen this setup before holding the spring to the stu, I wonder if it's a bodge, or not?

Looks like the two balance regulator pins might have been bent to lean forward, not sure why, or is this original? See image.

I don't know if this is the original spring but bent, or if this is the wrong spring?

It seems to look like a very bent Breguet type spring, in that the first coil goes over the other coils. I might be wrong and I don't want to mislead you by suggesting Breguet style.

I don't know for sure what a Tissot 27A balance spring should look like. This is a problem I have every time I have to fix any bent spring, I don't know what it should look like from new.

I found an image online (ebay) from a selller of Tissot 27 movement parts, see here. One was completely flat, the other was like a Breguet. I've attached the image of the Breguet looking one (called 'ebay image').

I'm wondering if mine should be shaped like a Breguet, and so should it look like the attached? Do you know what a Tissot 27A balance spring should look like?

How would you approach this problem/fix? I cannot see a spare Tissot 27A spring online for sale. I'm wondering if there is another spring that is the same? How would you suggest I search?

What is the swiss movement code for balance hair springs? I usually use Cousinsuk but they don't list the 27A only the 27 and lots of others like 27. Is there a good site that lists all the swiss codes for watch parts? Like cannon pinion is 240, where can I look up any watch part code?

See attached images of the balance from my watch, maybe these will help you answer.

Hope you can help.

 

Cheers,

Boyd 

IMG_1496(b).jpg

IMG_0162(b) (1).jpg

IMG_0158(b).jpg

IMG_0150(b).jpg

IMG_0156(b).jpg

ebay image.jpg

Posted

 Various  grades of this caliber was put in many brands, some were Bereguet with multiple adjustments, some were elabore grade with less adjustments.

 I am not sure but apparently  the piece your working originally came with flat coil, then some watch destroyer tried fitting an overcoil in, so made a mess . 

BUT then what do I know, 

To save energy, I keep one eye open for answer from learnt members.

Rgds

Posted

Hi judging by the pictures the last one is a breguet style, yours may have been like it but difficult to make a judgment as the others look as though yours may have been so the balance cock stud point and regulator looks like a flat one.   Inconclusive I know but without looking at it in the flesh difficult.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

What You have is Breguet hairspring , the bridge and regulator on it is seem to be for Breguet too. It is possible that someone has changed the entire balance and thus the hairspring with it, and he had to enlarge the diameter of the overcoil as per the regulator and stud hole, but he didn't know what shape is needed

The spring should be corrected like the one from ebay photo, this type is widely used in pocket and old wrist watches where the overcoil is on the same high as the center wheel and the wheel is big and no place for the overcoil. 

 

Edited by nevenbekriev
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I think it should be an over-coil hairspring or Breguet style based on the hairspring regulator pins, most flat hairsprings have what's called a boot style type pins where one side turns to open the regulator pins, I hope this helps, I would try to shape like the last picture and don't forget to re-adjust the beat, the balance should be the same as 27-2 and 27-21T according to the balance staff listed [ best-fit #667D ] non-inc. 

Posted
On 12/15/2023 at 3:02 PM, Nucejoe said:

 Various  grades of this caliber was put in many brands, some were Bereguet with multiple adjustments, some were elabore grade with less adjustments.

 I am not sure but apparently  the piece your working originally came with flat coil, then some watch destroyer tried fitting an overcoil in, so made a mess . 

BUT then what do I know, 

To save energy, I keep one eye open for answer from learnt members.

Rgds

Many thanks, this helped me!

On 12/15/2023 at 3:56 PM, watchweasol said:

Hi judging by the pictures the last one is a breguet style, yours may have been like it but difficult to make a judgment as the others look as though yours may have been so the balance cock stud point and regulator looks like a flat one.   Inconclusive I know but without looking at it in the flesh difficult.

Thanks, this is helping me!

On 12/15/2023 at 5:02 PM, nevenbekriev said:

What You have is Breguet hairspring , the bridge and regulator on it is seem to be for Breguet too. It is possible that someone has changed the entire balance and thus the hairspring with it, and he had to enlarge the diameter of the overcoil as per the regulator and stud hole, but he didn't know what shape is needed

The spring should be corrected like the one from ebay photo, this type is widely used in pocket and old wrist watches where the overcoil is on the same high as the center wheel and the wheel is big and no place for the overcoil. 

 

Thanks this really helps and is encouraging me!

20 hours ago, CYCLOPS said:

I think it should be an over-coil hairspring or Breguet style based on the hairspring regulator pins, most flat hairsprings have what's called a boot style type pins where one side turns to open the regulator pins, I hope this helps, I would try to shape like the last picture and don't forget to re-adjust the beat, the balance should be the same as 27-2 and 27-21T according to the balance staff listed [ best-fit #667D ] non-inc. 

Thanks this really helps and is encouraging me! I’m going to reshape it like the Breguet style and then adjust the beat error, I can already see the beat error is out loads! Ta guys!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you @Mark. I only became a Patreon subscriber 5 or 6 months ago, but I draw so much value here. If you come up with future contribution or support opportunities, I will be on board.
    • Hi Mike I did a ships clock a long while ago, not a Hermle though and without getting the beast in my hands to refresh my memory I can’t recall the timing.  This doesn’t help I know but will start the grey matter turning.
    • Of course it will continue Richard.
    • I have stripped and cleaned a Hermle ships clock. It was just oily, no major faults, and I reassembled it, following my photos in reverse order. The time train is fine but the strike train will not play the ships bell strike for half-past. Ships bells play a four hour sequence for the 'watches' and play double 'ding' for the hour and the double dings plus one for the half past (eg half past the second hour is 'ding-ding' 'ding-ding' 'ding'). Sounds complicated but it isn't really. The strike wheel consists of pairs of bumps (for the ding-ding) and no single bumps. There must me some mechanism on the half-past that lifts the strike lever over one of the bumps so only one ding is played. When I get to a half past, it still plays double ding. I have a feeling it is to do with the lever in front of the rack (there is a sprung attachment  on it) and the position of the wheel (to the right) with the two pins that lets that lever fall, but no matter where I place that wheel I cannot get a single ding at half past! Please can someone help with advice on positioning so I can fix this? BTW Happy Easter 🐣 
    • No it's not 52. I had looked at the Pocket Watch lift angles thread, which lists Elgin 6s as something really high like 62° but visually that is not at all what this watch is doing. I think 42° is more correct and that's where my machine is setup. The watch has a million problems but I have made solid progress. Impulse jewel replaced. Hairspring didn't match the balance (which also doesn't match the serial) but I got it down into range this weekend with 8 or 10 huge timing washers. Replaced the mainspring, balance and train are nice and free. At this point it is running consistently and in beat at about 160°, the third wheel has a bend that sends the timegrapher on a little roller coaster every 8 minutes or so. Remaining amplitude problems may be down to the escapement. The banking pins were way out and it didn't run at all before I started. It has one of the old brass escape wheels rather than steel, and I assume the faces its teeth are probably worn or scored in a way I can't yet fix (or see without a microscope). I know this watch is not going to run above 250° but I am going to keep trying to get above 200. But the best part about this watch? Some unscrupulous person stamped "21 JEWELS" on the train bridge sometime in the past, right on top of the Damascening. It's a 15 jewel movement.
×
×
  • Create New...