Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi a bought this liquid called liquinox a watch this watch repairer called Alex use it but everytime a mixed it with still water to watch it keep bring rust and I'm not sure it is right to use?

20231219_153041.jpg

Posted

yes- water based and water is the enemy so if you use it you have to displace the water. Don't let parts soak for long and rinse in IPA immediately then warm air dry...

...there will be others here who avoid any water based products for just the reason you've discovered...

I use liquinox for extra dirty parts and case parts. It gets things extremely clean but use with caution...

  • Like 1
Posted

I experienced this problem several years ago when I first started out in this hobby. 

I made a similar comment in a post about water-based cleaners causing rust, as did several other members.

I think it was @nickelsilver who promptly chided us for jumping to conclusions and making generalised statements. He pointed out that water-based cleaners have been used in horology for decades without any problems. He also noted that we were using non-horological products with non-horological cleaning machines.

After thinking about his comments, I have to agree with his observations. I think proper watch cleaning products have additives in them that inhibit corrosion and if used according to the manufacturer's instructions, should perform as expected.

Over this past year, I've been using my dental water-based ultrasonic cleaning solution for cleaning clock parts, as using quantities of L&R #111 enough to immerse such large parts would be expensive. And now I realize that I didn't get the rust problem. So, what did I do differently? 

I think it is the concentration of solution used. Dental ultrasonic cleaning solutions are typically used in 1% to 2% concentrations, similar to Liquinox. And up to 10% for heavily soiled instruments. I used about 5%-10% solutions as my clocks were really filthy.

Dental ultrasonic cleaners are supposed to contain corrosion inhibitors in them and are designed to prevent rust. But our surgical instruments are basically made of stainless steel and do not rust. So I suspect the amount of corrosion inhibitor in them are too low to prevent rust in soft and high carbon steels. By using my solutions at higher concentrations, it finally had enough corrosion inhibitors to prevent rust.

Liquinox is also supposed to contain corrosion inhibitors, but like dental solutions, are designed for stainless steels. So my advice is to try Liquinox at 5% concentrations and see what happens.

Posted

Hi. I use a water based ammoniated cleaner for clocks in the machine no problems. I think the most important part of the cleaning process is drying the parts well to avoid rust, warm air is the best and don’t skimp the process.

  • Like 1
Posted

I have had 1 watch out of the maybe 30 or so that I have done that formed some rust stains on the wheels.
I am not sure what I did different but to avoid it happening again I did the following

1. Lower the temperature of my washes.  Not sure if this was the cause but I feel the the one bad cycle was with a slightly higher temp (I keep the temp under 50º now)
2. Refresh my IPA rinse jars.  Perhaps I should add one more jar - my theory is that even though my final rinse jar looked clear and clean perhaps enough water had made it through from earlier stages to dilute it so that water remained on the parts?
3. I am more careful about getting the parts promptly out of the water based jars and into the IPA.  I previously thought that I had a lot of time as long as the parts were not exposed to air while wet but following this experience I am less inclined to wander off and do something else while the parts are cleaning.

Following this I have also taken to sometimes washing parts by hand in IPA using a small (#4) paint brush from the local arts shop and have found my results (measured in terms of watch amplitude) have improved.

 

Posted
21 hours ago, Murks said:

Hi a bought this liquid called liquinox a watch this watch repairer called Alex use it but everytime a mixed it with still water to watch it keep bring rust and I'm not sure it is right to use?

 

Is there any reason you're using Liquidnox instead of a solvent-based cleaner like L and R. I know it's biodegradable which is a good thing. As others have said, maybe up the concentration level.

Posted

Just because a so watch repairer on youtube using it to clean watch parts and plate and bridge thought to give it a try.

  • Like 1
Posted

Because of the concern of water here I use 1 percent Liquinox and deionized water, change the IPA rinse every time and into my dehydrator with the fan. No rust. The cost savings, no offensive odors and cleanliness are too good to pass up

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If the watch is new, just return it to the seller for a refund or replacement.
    • Keevo, Welcome to the group ! I'm thinking that you have some damage to the hour, and/ or minute wheel. Possibly just a bent, otherwise damaged, or missing tooth.   Your photo didn't post that I can see. I think you'll have to open it to start really finding the issue. Best, Randy
    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
×
×
  • Create New...