Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all of you,

I am planning to buy my first microscope, and I have found one with a 20x magnification. The lens looks far enough from the plate as it is for young ones who study gems and minerals.

Do you think this would be a reaspnable choice? I can't afford an expensive microscope and I'm not good at all at DIY 😀

https://www.amazon.fr/gp/product/B00DW4XL7A/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?smid=A1HLP5RNBQ132W&th=1

Posted

That design of microscope is not suitable for watch repair work. 20X magnification is too high for general work. Usually we work at about 3.5X magnification.

There is no tilt in the eyepieces, that means you have to look straight down, which would hurt your back and neck.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

That design of microscope is not suitable for watch repair work. 20X magnification is too high for general work. Usually we work at about 3.5X magnification.

There is no tilt in the eyepieces, that means you have to look straight down, which would hurt your back and neck.

Agreed Hector. Blueharp i have a scope thats x10 , still too high for general repair

Posted

I put a 0.5X Barlow lens on my microscope, so I can zoom from 3.5X to 22.5X. I do most work at the lower mags.

The higher mag I use for examination, and fiddly things like oiling cap jewels.

Posted

From the second photo down, it looks like the angle of the eyepieces can be adjusted, although this seems unlikely as it would no longer be trained on the viewing plate.
You don't want a scope with upright eyepieces - I think these are made to be viewed standing up, which would get tiring.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi watchweasol, yes that is a way of doing it I suppose, I have a pair of mainspring hole making pliers on their way off eBay, the ones with the different shaped punches. I may be able to use them to make a hook.
    • Hello everyone, Glad to be here. 
    • This is a modern watch, the crown is definitely made from solid 316l steel. You must have heated the crown to some 200C caused the surface colour to change to light yellow. It's similiar to steel tempering. Yes it is the chromium oxide that forms during the heating that gives rise to the colours you see as you know stainless steel contains chromium. The fact the crown is SS lead me to a question, you've never heard of the alum method? Because alum would work perfectly in this case, instead of drilling, which, there is always a risk of damaging the crown, I would just let the crown chilling in some warm alum solution for 1-2 days and the job is done.   Sure can but the thing is the crown is not just mirror finishing, the lock symbol is polish while its background is some sand-blasted finishing so it would be hard to replicate that. You can buff it all shiny but losing the sand-blasted finishing means it won't look exactly like before.   Gasket is always tricky to me. I would try to use some gasket that look closest to the broken one in term of thickness and diameter, and check if the replacement gasket fit with some friction to the case tube. Lastly you can still use alum at this point.
    • No mate. Sorry if that offends you! Also please don’t take threads off-topic. I thank you sir. 
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...