Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

OK, I have recently services four Accutron 218s and disassembled another (my first) which is now a parts watch...lol.

Feeling really good about my results and my methodology.

Accutron recommends OL-207 for all but jewel settings.  OK, if these watches I have serviced were lubricated in this way...I am not a fan! 

It appears to dry and then flakes everywhere.   When confined (e.g., center wheel) it seems to gum up and freeze.

I determined not to use it--NO.  I am using Molykote for those lube points instead.

Shields up--prepared for incoming!

  • Haha 1
Posted

Hi, I repair accutrons. I'm glad that more people are doing so. Never use the moly grease recommended in the manual... it's garbage. Only use it for the crown area because as you found out, it flakes off. Use HP 1300 grease for the center arbor and all non jeweled friction points. 

Posted
9 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Shields up--prepared for incoming!

shields up and haven't you built your fallout shelter yet? Nothing like a good fallout shelter.

I don't worry about the recommendation so I use 9504 modern and it works really well. Plus it does at that pesky really short shelf life to upset you in as a shelflife twice as long and then I'll just disregard that because it's synthetic it should last forever.

9 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

OK, if these watches I have serviced were lubricated in this way...I am not a fan! 

It appears to dry and then flakes everywhere.   When confined (e.g., center wheel) it seems to gum up and freeze.

then yes back in your center wheel discussion didn't I point out that you do not want to use the manufactures recommendation because their retirement plan was based on selling a lot center wheels when they get disintegrated due to poor lubrication choices.

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted
10 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I use 9504 modern and it works really well

I will second this. I also use 9504 in my Accutrons (and just bought 9020 for the pivots). I don't have nearly as much experience as @JohnR725, but I've serviced a few so far with excellent results.

  • Like 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

I will second this. I also use 9504 in my Accutrons (and just bought 9020 for the pivots). I don't have nearly as much experience as @JohnR725, but I've serviced a few so far with excellent results.

I use M56-b (AKA LGN) for pivots (surprise surprise!).  It has a lower viscosity than 9020.

Of course there is this craziness from the Accutron service manual.

image.png.6ec5b0234b67fb49f97327059cc15f14.png

I am taking a shine to servicing these things.  Each one gets easier.  Still a little tricky getting the index and pawl fingers just right.

My cleaning methodology is pretty refined now, using the ultrasonic for the clean and an L&R Master to spin dry between each step as well as dry in the last step.  Found the right jars for the job and printed a lifter to lift the basket out of the jars.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I am taking a shine to servicing these things.

Same here. I'm also a bit of an electronics nerd, so I very much enjoyed an excuse to buy a new micro soldering setup to replace the capacitors and resistors that seem to be common points of failure.

I'm gearing up to do my first 218 replacement this weekend.

  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

Same here. I'm also a bit of an electronics nerd, so I very much enjoyed an excuse to buy a new micro soldering setup to replace the capacitors and resistors that seem to be common points of failure.

I'm gearing up to do my first 218 replacement this weekend.

Did not know that these were typical points of failure.  Resistors are incredibly robust...capacitors not so much.  The transistors would be the most likely thing to fail apart from the coils themselves IMHO.  I am an EE, and a musician, so also attracted to the currents, voltages, and tuning fork!!

So you have been doing 214s?  I have a few but am going to finish all of the 218s before doing the 214s.

Posted
34 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

So you have been doing 214s?

Not yet. I mean, I have a Spaceview and a railroad-approved 214, but they're runners so just got a cleanup. I've done a 219, which has a conveniently separate circuit board, making the component replacement pretty easy.
 

And yeah, I also thought resistors would last basically forever, but on one 219 and the current 218 I'm working on, they're way out of their tolerance range.

Posted
1 hour ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

current 218 I'm working on

Are you using one of these movement holders for the 218?  It is a wonderful tool.  I had one but found another and bought it, so I have two now.

image.png.b370c25d15820464bd76acb3add19518.png

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

railroad-approved 214

oh for servicing this when you get around to it would give you the sheet on setting up the hack for it. The railroad approved to Ford teams have a hacking mechanism and the only way you get the instructions would've been if you had purchased the hacking upgrade kit. Otherwise the specifications do not seem to exist anywhere in the universe fortunately I PDF that.

  • Like 2
Posted
9 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

oh for servicing this when you get around to it would give you the sheet on setting up the hack for it

That is very kind of you! Now I'm very curious, so if you'd like to send it to me I would be very appreciative.

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

That is very kind of you! Now I'm very curious, so if you'd like to send it to me I would be very appreciative.

Me too. I would like to see it.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Posted
51 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Me too. I would like to see it.

fortunately when I post things I usually put them in a particular folder so I can find them for uploading so conveniently they were together.  oh and yes you really would need the stem thing if you are installing this for the first time. If it's already in an existing watch it by theory should be much easier to do unless you change the back gasket. In other words on a 214 the location of the crown versus the back gaskets and the movement the back casket will of course move things around.

then while I was remembering this that's why I uploaded this to some other group somebody was having a running issue on a 214 with a hack although unless you disassemble you won't actually know if you have a hack or not sort of. So I uploaded to comment on if it has a hack it could be an issue in these would be the issues why.

In other words the crown is on the back if dirt gets under the crowd that changes spacing if the back gasket thickness should change. Which unfortunately will occur today as you may not really get original 214 gaskets and they have replacements and of the thickness is different it can be an issue.

Oh and then if you are installing this for the first time you'd need the thing on the stems because you would have to change those to get one of the right length. I very distinctly remember when I installed one of these I was a student in school which was quite a while ago and I do not remember being a pleasant experience. Because as you can see with the instructions you have to set everything up and put it all together and if not right then you have to yes they can be a fun experience. I don't think I've ever done a 214 after that that had a hack though

 

Accutron 214 hack.PDF Accutron 214 stems.PDF

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I've got a couple of Accutrons tucked away somewhere, but I've never serviced or repaired one, so it's good to know there are some proficient servicers here that I might be asking for help in the near future.

  • Like 3
Posted
4 hours ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

That is very kind of you! Now I'm very curious, so if you'd like to send it to me I would be very appreciative.

Goes in the mail today.  Yell when you get it.  Should be self explanatory, but...

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I suppose if you like the other PDF may be of like this one. it's not a complete PDF it only has 214 and 218 stuff. Bulova had parts kits a box with a large card that when in the lid and all the envelopes corresponding to the parts and I think they would add empty envelopes. So if you were servicing  these at one time it would be smart to have these although I'm pretty sure they were expensive. So somebody kindly scanned them into a nice PDF I had scanned a couple of the cards but this is much nicer it's all in one place. So then were missing all the other watches but typically the majority of the tuning fork of Bulova would be  214 and 218 and the others while popular not as much and I don't think every single other one had a parts kit that was probably at 230 kit and a 221 kit don't think there was a 219 kit may be.

Bulova Accutron Parts.pdf

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keevo, Welcome to the group ! I'm thinking that you have some damage to the hour, and/ or minute wheel. Possibly just a bent, otherwise damaged, or missing tooth.   Your photo didn't post that I can see. I think you'll have to open it to start really finding the issue. Best, Randy
    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
    • Like these? https://www.watch-tools.de/metal-straps/springbars/assortment-360-strong-spring-bars-beco-inox-o-1-8mm.php  
×
×
  • Create New...