Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, I wanted to ask around here before attempting to lubricate the shock setting on this watch. It's got an odd assembly that I wasn't able to find online and I'm unsure of how to take it apart. This comes from an FHF 1686 movement.

Any help with identifying this shock setting and subsequent disassembly help would be appreciated!

PXL_20240111_043254584.thumb.jpg.60896e030df6946ae63aeb16c13d908b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neat, I've never seen one like that. It looks to me basically like a circlip, where you need to squeeze the prongs together. I'd get my fine tweezers in one of the holes and push towards the center.

Looks like a serious candidate to join the Swiss Space Program, so maybe take precautions with some Rodico or a plastic baggie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, donutdan said:

Hi, I wanted to ask around here before attempting to lubricate the shock setting on this watch. It's got an odd assembly that I wasn't able to find online and I'm unsure of how to take it apart. This comes from an FHF 1686 movement.

Any help with identifying this shock setting and subsequent disassembly help would be appreciated!

PXL_20240111_043254584.thumb.jpg.60896e030df6946ae63aeb16c13d908b.jpg

Its a swiss bal. shock spring. Stabil, it should operate like a lyre spring. If you can post a clearer closer photo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/10/2024 at 11:40 PM, donutdan said:

Hi, I wanted to ask around here before attempting to lubricate the shock setting on this watch. It's got an odd assembly that I wasn't able to find online and I'm unsure of how to take it apart. This comes from an FHF 1686 movement.

Any help with identifying this shock setting and subsequent disassembly help would be appreciated!

PXL_20240111_043254584.thumb.jpg.60896e030df6946ae63aeb16c13d908b.jpg

As a quick update, I was unable to remove either of the shock setting springs. I think they do have a similar structure to a lyre shaped spring as suggested but the "prongs" are just too wide to be unseated through the provided gap.

Any suggestions where I could find more info on this assembly? At present, I don't know how someone would be able to service these without a specialized tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, donutdan said:

As a quick update, I was unable to remove either of the shock setting springs. I think they do have a similar structure to a lyre shaped spring as suggested but the "prongs" are just too wide to be unseated through the provided gap.

Any suggestions where I could find more info on this assembly? At present, I don't know how someone would be able to service these without a specialized tool.

Is the width of just one arm wider than the space provided to remove it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Is the width of just one arm wider than the space provided to remove it ?

I think it's only 1.5 the width or less. If I try to remove one arm, the other blocks it preventing it from being removed. I've also tried pushing the spring to different positions to give more clearance but my attempts have been unsuccessful unfortunately.

I may try as Nucejoe suggested although it looks like the shock setting is press fit into place. I don't own a jeweling press nor have I used one but I don't mind just shelving this project until a later date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, donutdan said:

I think it's only 1.5 the width or less. If I try to remove one arm, the other blocks it preventing it from being removed. I've also tried pushing the spring to different positions to give more clearance but my attempts have been unsuccessful unfortunately.

I may try as Nucejoe suggested although it looks like the shock setting is press fit into place. I don't own a jeweling press nor have I used one but I don't mind just shelving this project until a later date.

You might be able to lift one arm up and over the other as you push it out of the slot. Obviously dont force anything and use good magnification so you can see how much space and tension there is between the two arms. Good luck🤞 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

You might be able to lift one arm up and over the other as you push it out of the slot. Obviously dont force anything and use good magnification so you can see how much space and tension there is between the two arms. Good luck🤞 

We have success! I was able to service the shock setting finally and the watch went from running at +100 s/day to only -9! The tolerances are significantly tighter than in incabloc springs and it was difficult to see even if the spring was unseated or not. I'm still curious about what this shock setting is called but for now I'm willing to just accept this small victory.

PXL_20240115_041301730.jpg

PXL_20240115_041311433.jpg

PXL_20240115_041411769.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, donutdan said:

We have success! I was able to service the shock setting finally and the watch went from running at +100 s/day to only -9! The tolerances are significantly tighter than in incabloc springs and it was difficult to see even if the spring was unseated or not. I'm still curious about what this shock setting is called but for now I'm willing to just accept this small victory.

PXL_20240115_041301730.jpg

PXL_20240115_041311433.jpg

PXL_20240115_041411769.jpg

The design is as i mentioned earlier Stabil 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
21 minutes ago, Burruz said:

Just out of interest would it be appropriate to carefully remove some material between the jaws (folded 1000grit?) to allow easier access next time or is that not acceptable?

🤔 that would be altering the design that folks put thousands of hours into.   I say go for it 😆

Lol maybe not, it would undoubtedly weaken the spring. We try what we try and we take the consequences that go with the attempt. Generally ( i just love that word , its a  🤔  might, should, could kinda word.) altering a design in a way that has no reversal COULD be a mistake. Then again some designs are just pure shite, just look at the DeLorian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
    • yes the advertising revenue should generate money. The question is how much money? Then as far as the cost of the website goes that's relatively easy to determine? all you would have to do to grasp costs and profitability would be to go to the link below and you can actually get a website for free try it out for free I believe you get no advertising initially. They also talk about that they'll help you out they have marketing tools and some sort of paid subscription or something. So I guess were shopping for a whatever just ask them what would a maybe could use this one as an example in other words it's going to look basically identical to this is going to have advertising a paid subscriptions what's it going to cost? After all they want to sell or give us a message board like this they should bill answer the questions as they're the people who did the software for this. Yes they really said you can have a free discussion group at least to start. https://invisioncommunity.com/ I was curious about the monthly supporter thing where exactly do we find that on this message board? A quick search I'm not finding it so obviously I'm not looking in the right place?
    • Help me out here, but with all the advertising on this site (which I don't mind) wouldn't it pay for itself or even make money for the owner ???
×
×
  • Create New...