Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi there all a quick question I've been given a box of stems all mixed up. How can I find out which stem relates to a make or caliber of a watch.

William

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi. With a great deal of patience and difficulty as any two stems may look alike but have subltle differences. You could try the web site. WINDINGSTEMS.COM to look for similarities.  Not an easy job.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Wgm63 said:

Hi there all a quick question I've been given a box of stems all mixed up. How can I find out which stem relates to a make or caliber of a watch.

William

Yes there is a way, I've done lots and lots of stem and staff identifications over the last two years. Either by catalogs or as WW has mentioned balance staff and stem .com. you do  need an accurate bench micrometer. Quite a slow process though, i managed to get to around 40 id's per hour, some you find straight away some take a little while. Stems are easier to measure up than staffs. There are two basic reference sizes to search for initially then the search narrows down to find the remain sizes and then a final match.  I actually find it a therapeutic treasure hunt.

1 hour ago, Wgm63 said:

Hi there all a quick question I've been given a box of stems all mixed up. How can I find out which stem relates to a make or caliber of a watch.

William

Heres an example of a lovely big omega pocket watch stem

Screenshot_20240122-204633_Samsung Internet.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Thank you all for the advice ect I will endeavour to sort them out with neverenoughwatches suggestion hopefully.

Thanks again it's much appreciated 👏 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Wgm63 said:

Thank you all for the advice ect I will endeavour to sort them out with neverenoughwatches suggestion hopefully.

Thanks again it's much appreciated 👏 

Once you have done a few you become much quicker. But you really need an accurate bench micrometer, digital calipers are a bit fiddly and not super accurate, they can vary from the tips of the caliper to the head of them. Some stems are also very close, staffs even more so, there can be differences of 10 - 20 microns between a particular dimension. But its certainly doable with the right tools. Not sure on the scope of different stems, i think about 3000 ronda upto 1965 the reference numbers go higher but there missing numbers that are not used. Staffs i would guess at double that. Plus all the old ones that aren't even listed.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If the watch is new, just return it to the seller for a refund or replacement.
    • Keevo, Welcome to the group ! I'm thinking that you have some damage to the hour, and/ or minute wheel. Possibly just a bent, otherwise damaged, or missing tooth.   Your photo didn't post that I can see. I think you'll have to open it to start really finding the issue. Best, Randy
    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
×
×
  • Create New...