Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I picked up a non-runner watch at the flea market today and when I got home and opened it, I was scratching my head. Is this a mechanical or electronic movement? I did a quick search and discovered "electronically timed" is marketing hype.  it's mechanical, a cheap pin pallet design. The balance spring has seen better days. Can the spring be repaired? Unless it's an easy fix, I don't think I can repair this watch. The movement looks somewhat crude but the dial is nice. Thanks for your thoughts.

waldan back.jpg

balance spring waldan.jpg

Posted

Hi. Yes it’s just hype just about every watch is electronically tested.    The balance spring terminal curve is distorted and it’s out of the regulator which is probably why it’s distorted.     Just remove the balance from the watch and most of the distortion will disappear.    Lay the balance on its cock and post some pictures it’s not that bad.

  • Like 1
Posted

Interesting marketing strategy rather than impressing the customer with the quality of the watch or the feel or anything else let's print words on the back of the case to impress the customers.

Then ever since the electronic timing machine came into existence every watch is timed on it as it speeds up production considerably. Although there are watches that are marked not regulated there is still time but a timing machine. Typically in the US a lot of watches were marked non-or not regulated because of import tariffs that would bump up the cost if the watch add features like the quantity of jewels precious metals if it's regulated or not. So to keep the movement costs down they would say not regulated even though it had been placed across the timing machine

then in the early days of electric watches watches of your quality in other words inexpensive might have interesting dials that would have words that look like electric but weren't to try to convince the customer that maybe this is an electric watch when it was not

Then the hairspring doesn't really look that bad yes it looks bad now but we've seen worse that would be a lot harder to fix this just looks like it's knocked out of alignment.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If the watch is new, just return it to the seller for a refund or replacement.
    • Keevo, Welcome to the group ! I'm thinking that you have some damage to the hour, and/ or minute wheel. Possibly just a bent, otherwise damaged, or missing tooth.   Your photo didn't post that I can see. I think you'll have to open it to start really finding the issue. Best, Randy
    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
×
×
  • Create New...