Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all, 

I have recently had the pleasure of working on my first omega, I am at the start of the restoration and am struggling to remove the crystal, is this glued in? The case is a 166.002 with a calibre 565 movement

any tips or help would be much appreciated

IMG_3037.png

Posted

So far I have only tried to push the crystal out with my thumbs but even with a good amount of pressure is doesn’t want to move, I did also think this could have a tensioner ring and it’s not something I have encountered before

Posted

You should be able to see if it has a tension ring if you look at it from the inside. If it doesn't have a tension ring you should be able to push it out with your thumbs, but as you can't do that I would say it has a tension ring. So, you will need a crystal press to get it out and back in. This could be a good option if you don't have one and are on a budget. I don't have it myself but I'm considering getting one as I'd like a bit more control than I have with my Bergeon 5500 which I demonstrate in this video.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I had a feeling that could be the case I hadn’t worked with one before and tbh the inside of the case needs a good clean so I couldn’t really tell if it had a tension ring, good thing I have the press so I will give that a go later today thank you

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Samspeed87 said:

166.002

Omega case numbers are interesting because they referred to more of a style of the case then the material it's made out of. Then numbers have also been revised so that your number is actually 166.0020. Then at the link below you can find the casing information I snipped out an image the first one is 18 karat gold with the indication of a ring. The second case that are not snipping out apparently is pink gold and once again it's a ring and the letters are different indicating that the internal ring color would be different.Then I just picked the last one look at stainless steel and once again the letters are different indicating stainless steel ring so your Crystal has a ring which is why you can't easily push it out by hand.

image.png.9a4e469c2493f0b2065850a2ac26bfbb.png

 

https://www.cousinsuk.com/document/search?SearchString=166.002

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Thank you all for the advice, I used my crystal press and there is a tension ring, the crystal came out whole so I can double check all measurements and get a new one on order, always nice to learn something new in this hobby

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An industrial break cleaner , like Holts does a good job of rinsing off paraffin 
    • In cap jewels on several watches I have serviced over the years. I've recently serviced a couple of Longines movements where the cap jewels were colourless. They are a real pain. Without colour they disappear when immersed in any liquid for cleaning 😲 Not necessarily. Cousins do a 10ml bottle for £26 which will last me for years. That's just half the price of a simple Bergeon silicone cushion, so not too expensive 🤣
    • I wanted to post an update as I have two movements running really well now, 230-250 amplitude , 0.5 and under beat error, and +/-8 seconds or so. I removed the hairspring assembly in order to start over and noticed that the terminal curve between the stud and regulator arm was distorted. The stud was lower than it should be. I massaged the curve to look pretty good and reinstalled it. I followed Alex's video advice, best I could with 10x magnification, and with the regulator arm set in the middle of the curve I adjusted the stud so the spring was centered. I then made sure I could move the regulator arm the entire terminal curve without upsetting the coils. I then put it back on the Timegrapher and began closing down the regulator pins until I saw a change in amplitude which means to me that the pins were now pinching the spring. I opened them slightly and it looks good except I have a 0 on dial down, +3 on dial up but -16 on crown down.  I'm a bit stuck on how to adjust out the positional error. I also noticed a drop in amplitude, 180-200 on crown down. In the other video link I posted at about minute 26 if I remember he adjusts out positional error by manipulating  the regulator pin gap. With crown down the hairspring falls away from the pin and the rate slows so he closes the pins a bit to keep them tighter in crown down position. That means the spring is tighter on dial up as well but then he moved the regulator arm to slow the movement.  There must be some Seiko experts here that have some methods for dialing out positional errors. 
    • Like these? https://www.watch-tools.de/metal-straps/springbars/assortment-360-strong-spring-bars-beco-inox-o-1-8mm.php  
    • I've seen them on several swiss-made movements as well. Last one was a Tissot if I remember correctly.
×
×
  • Create New...