Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After servicing about six with minimal issues, I have run across a couple that stump me.

I think I mentioned one before that seemed electrically sound but did not hum.  I have another.

All components check to the extent that I have measured them (cannot measure transistor Beta).

When measured on the test set, I get a little over 25uA.  This is about right if the unit is not oscillating.  1.5V and a 2.2M bias resistor with a beta of 50 would get in the ball park of 20uA.  A little more beta and you are north of 25uA.  This further confirms that the circuitry is functioning.  The cap measures about right.  I do not believe its value is too critical anyway.  It mostly serves as dc blocking and not establishing resonance.

I tried another tuning fork and...no luck.  I am going to drive this one to the end so that I can understand root cause.

Posted

Thank you for your persistence. I'm sure you'll solve it in the end.

Just out of curiosity, when you measure the coils, are you measuring DC resistance or AC inductance? 

Is this the 218 or 214 circuit?

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Thank you for your persistence. I'm sure you'll solve it in the end.

Just out of curiosity, when you measure the coils, are you measuring DC resistance or AC inductance? 

Is this the 218 or 214 circuit?

dc resistance.  I believe that the ac impedance will be intrinsic to the physical structure of the coil.  I do have the tools to measure inductance but don't believe it is necessary.

Since my post, I powered the unit and monitored the base and collector with an oscilloscope while "pinging" one tine of the fork.  I got a very nice sinusoidal envelope and it died away.  Then I removed power and did the same thing.  Nothing.  This leads me to believe that the gain of the transistor (beta/hfe) is too low.  Just a theory at this point.

Posted

Of the three 218s I've serviced, the one that behaved like you describe was weak magnets on the fork. If you replaced the fork, probably not your issue.

Two of the other non-runners were a 218 and 219, and both sets of resistors and caps were out of spec. Soldering in new ones fixed the problem in both cases.

Not as scientific, but my anecdotal results so far. I'm a computer programmer, not an EE 🙂

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, ManSkirtBrew said:

Of the three 218s I've serviced, the one that behaved like you describe was weak magnets on the fork. If you replaced the fork, probably not your issue.

Two of the other non-runners were a 218 and 219, and both sets of resistors and caps were out of spec. Soldering in new ones fixed the problem in both cases.

Not as scientific, but my anecdotal results so far. I'm a computer programmer, not an EE 🙂

Very interesting.  I would posit that increasing the magnetism is roughly equivalent to increasing the transistor gain, so in that sense, your results are the same as mine.  Indeed mine is a 218 (sorry I forgot to mention earlier).  Similarly, the resistor can have the effect of a low gain transistor (not in the same way).  Transistor beta is a function of collector current, so a resistor going higher lowers the quiescent collector current and thus reduces gain.  But, I would think the resistor would have to be way out of spec...dunno.

I am impressed with your soldering skills.  I have the same iron as you, but perhaps a different tip.

I did a little research on small transistor packages and so far all I have found is SOT23 type.  I managed to solder one in (another case) but it was crowded.

Another thing I did was to fool around with some tiny compasses and several forks to see if I could measure a difference in their magnetism.  Sketchy results.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I could measure a difference in their magnetism. 

I believe they make newfangled electronic devices that could measure magnetic fields but they're probably expensive. In the absence of that you can make your own if you had a linear Hall effect sensor. The last time I needed to understand what a magnet was doing I just got myself a linear Hall effect sensor and made by own magnetic linear meter it worked quite nicely.

  • Like 1
Posted

Occam's Razor strikes again.

It appears that the problem was purely mechanical. 

The hack lever in some instances can ride up the fulcrum pin.  When it does, it can hit the fork ever so slightly.  The train bridge will hold it down somewhat, but I don't believe it is always snug.

Also, I have observed different washers.  Sometimes two gold, sometimes gold and silver.  I always to put it back the way it came.  In this instance, I think the wrong washer was in place...the interior one.  So all this worked together to stop oscillation.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

Good job.

Sooo.... when are you going to start on a 214?

I would like to hear about your experience. And count the number of expletives you had to use. 😉

 

I still have a bunch of these 218s to finish. Then I will read the book, "Cuss Words for Watchmakers"

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I still have a bunch of these 218s to finish. Then I will read the book, "Cuss Words for Watchmakers"

Is that the International version or Texan version?

Many years back I met a group of Texan oilmen who were staying in the same hotel. And we seemed to bump into them everywhere we went. Didn't understand half the things they said, it was like a foreign dialect. My New Yorker friend who was with me didn't fair much better.

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I put the original broken glass (whats left of it) behind the acrylic. This is how it originally looked like. A cheap clock but I like it. Very noisy when the alarm comes wake up guaranteed! 🙂
    • If at all possible, find a service guide for the automatic movements your work on, because the lubrication procedures may have different requirements or rely on oils you would not use in a manual wind train (in addition to the braking grease you mentioned). Some autos like older Seikos do not have a manual wind option, so the procedure of letting down the mainspring without being able to use the crown may require a screwdriver in the ratchet wheel screw and great care. Do you have an auto movement you were planning to start with?
    • I am an amateur, so there's that. I do not get fixated on amplitude, lift angles, and beat error. However, 4.8ms would bug me if it were my watch. But you must judge your own skills to appreciate the possibility of going backward. I suggest, that you button it up let your friend enjoy the watch for now. As your skills progress, come back to it and correct it. I assume that this watch has a fixed hairspring pin. Some modern watches have an adjustable pin along with adjustable regulator. These are trivial to get in beat. I own a valjoux 726 my dad gave me on my 18th birthday (a looooong time ago). I broke the ratchet wheel with an aggressive wind 4 yrs ago. I have been waiting for my skills to progress before doing a service. I am close. Your advice is well placed and I will apply it.
    • I didn’t find any anomaly to the left of the red mark…reflection? this is the balance in its pivot in the inverted assembly. i can’t see any obvious kinks  and the spring is flat as far as I can see. Either the stud screw is missing, or it’s glued in… I don’t know. I’m loathe to fiddle with it. Any further insights? Thanks!
    • Update!  I've dismantled it, cleaned all the glue off, and rebuilt and lubricated the base movement. I'll leave the chrono part for another day. It's running well - great amplitude and keeping time, but it's got a beat error of 4.8ms.    How important is it to correct this? I'm worried that the potential for making things worse having to take the hairspring off and on repeatedly to adjust this. Would anyone here accept it at that?
×
×
  • Create New...