Jump to content

To B(ezel) or not to B(ezel)


Recommended Posts

I picked up this Omega Seamaster 166.003 (1969) many months ago. It was less than $300 US as a non-runner, but the only thing that seems to be wrong with it (other than enough dirt in the case to start a garden) is a broken main spring and missing bezel. The spring is on my latest Cousins' order but the bezel is as elusive as an albino, left-handed unicorn. Apparently these being very thin have a tendency to break and any NOS is already sold. And, of course, the Omega part is discontinued. 

The dilemma I face, at least internally, is do I leave sans bezel, or do I fudge a not-quite replacement bezel? Everything else seems to be original, or at least authentic Omega parts including the signed crown and crystal with the little Ω in the center. I have a couple of vintage Seiko bezels that with a little tweaking would probably fit. On one hand I'd like the watch to look finished (I'll be keeping and wearing it) but I also don't know if I'm 100% okay with a frankenbezel.

Assuming I can't find an original replacement (And I've no desire to buy a donor at 3X the price just for the bezel) What would you do?

 

 

2021_0111_160917_006.JPG

2021_0111_160932_007.JPG

2021_0111_161103_008.JPG

2021_0111_161134_010.JPG

2021_0111_161150_011.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, eccentric59 said:

I picked up this Omega Seamaster 166.003 (1969) many months ago. It was less than $300 US as a non-runner, but the only thing that seems to be wrong with it (other than enough dirt in the case to start a garden) is a broken main spring and missing bezel. The spring is on my latest Cousins' order but the bezel is as elusive as an albino, left-handed unicorn. Apparently these being very thin have a tendency to break and any NOS is already sold. And, of course, the Omega part is discontinued. 

The dilemma I face, at least internally, is do I leave sans bezel, or do I fudge a not-quite replacement bezel? Everything else seems to be original, or at least authentic Omega parts including the signed crown and crystal with the little Ω in the center. I have a couple of vintage Seiko bezels that with a little tweaking would probably fit. On one hand I'd like the watch to look finished (I'll be keeping and wearing it) but I also don't know if I'm 100% okay with a frankenbezel.

Assuming I can't find an original replacement (And I've no desire to buy a donor at 3X the price just for the bezel) What would you do?

 

 

2021_0111_160917_006.JPG

2021_0111_160932_007.JPG

2021_0111_161103_008.JPG

2021_0111_161134_010.JPG

2021_0111_161150_011.JPG

Originality is important to the best of us but how long you will be waiting and how much you might spend is unknown. All the while you could be wearing this with what would be a good looking match that only you will know is not genuine.  As long as no alteration is made to the case you can both have it on your wrist and continue to search for the correct bezel. Just think of it as a temporary fixture.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, oldhippy said:

No chance of a complete case.

After a year+ of looking that is my conclusion, barring someone stumbling upon a stockpile of vintage 1960's Omega parts in an abandoned warehouse somewhere.

6 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

and continue to search for the correct bezel.

I do keep my eyes open, but even used markets are selling this model without the bezel.

 

So this brings me to a more philosophical question. When does a watch become a franken? Replacing a mainspring or crystal doesn't. Replacing a screw or spring not from the OEM shouldn't. What about a crown? Balance? Third wheel?

 

If I modify a Seiko bezel to fit (which is my intention -- and will post pictures when that happens) or if I contract a jeweler to make a replica of the original part, I know purists will cringe, but I don't really see the loss of value in preserving the aesthetic.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The movement service was a success. Main spring was all it needed and now it runs +4 sec, 240°-ish amplitude and a positional beat error delta of 0.2. I also decided to use the Seiko bezel (if and when I can ever find a genuine replacement between doomsday and half-past never). Final results.

DSC_0003.thumb.JPG.d17f9efc1dc2ba807746620bc115ef45.JPG

DSC_0006.thumb.JPG.45c2108ed5ab8313ac34b0c8514420db.JPG

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
    • yes the advertising revenue should generate money. The question is how much money? Then as far as the cost of the website goes that's relatively easy to determine? all you would have to do to grasp costs and profitability would be to go to the link below and you can actually get a website for free try it out for free I believe you get no advertising initially. They also talk about that they'll help you out they have marketing tools and some sort of paid subscription or something. So I guess were shopping for a whatever just ask them what would a maybe could use this one as an example in other words it's going to look basically identical to this is going to have advertising a paid subscriptions what's it going to cost? After all they want to sell or give us a message board like this they should bill answer the questions as they're the people who did the software for this. Yes they really said you can have a free discussion group at least to start. https://invisioncommunity.com/ I was curious about the monthly supporter thing where exactly do we find that on this message board? A quick search I'm not finding it so obviously I'm not looking in the right place?
    • Help me out here, but with all the advertising on this site (which I don't mind) wouldn't it pay for itself or even make money for the owner ???
×
×
  • Create New...