Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello I acquired this watch to see how chronograph watches work,  as it was cheap. Now I have opened the back and find that the chronograph part does not work.  In fact I can’t find any connection to the watch internal parts. There is a button which is connected to a lever which turns a cam. The click springs look as it parts of them have broken off.  I can not find any information about this watch anywhere.  There is no serial numbers or caliber numbers. Just a stamped “Swiss Made” on the bridge.  Only ID is the name on the dial “Fortress”. There is also a name and date scratched on the inside back cover “7/6/1931” and a name that I can’t make out. 
Any help in finding the manufacturer of this watch and what might be missing from the watch would be a great help. 
Michael

IMG_2006.jpeg

IMG_2005.jpeg

IMG_2007.jpeg

Edited by oldhippy
member requested to remove it
Posted

Hi, this watch reminds me of the Cimier watches I see on eBay, there is a pocket watch style listed but the movement is not shown/pictured for reference, I believe something is broke/missing, a donor will probably be you best bet for repair......its a good looking watch, keep looking something will turn up.

Posted (edited)

It does look like there are parts missing AND the lever is broken. My guess is this was already used for a parts watch.

Edited by eccentric59
  • Like 1
Posted

This could be an inexpensive movement to learn a bit about pushers, levers, etc. in order to start understanding chronographs, but this does not function like a typical chronograph. Unless I am mistaken, this is one of the cheap mono pushers that actually use the entire movement as a stop watch, in effect just a hacking function. You can set the hands where you want them and then start and stop the movement, but it won't be telling the actual time simultaneously as a traditional chronograph does.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi folks, I'm doing some homework on getting a watchmaker's lathe, and it's clear I have a lot to learn. But I know one goal: I want to be able to fabricate wheels, which would require an indexing capability. I know how to use large lathes- like, giant metal lathes- but my experience is a few decades old now (but you never forget the smell of the metal cutting oil). So I'm looking to learn anew, and have a goal to get to a point where I can fabricate some basic watch parts. I also have no specific timeframe and want to do this right, so I'll be patient and learn what I need to before spending the money. I know I'm not going to get anything for a pittance, but I'm also not really able to put together the scratch for a $5-$10k lathe. What's out there for a hobbyist that can either handle some fabrication out of the box or can be relatively easily made to do so? Thanks!  
    • Hello and welcome to the WRT forum.   This usually points to broken balance pivot.  Though a watch in need of clean & lube can do the same. Easiest diag would be to  see if balance pivot doesn't stay in hole jewel of the setting, when you lift one side of balance rim with an oiler or gently with pair of tweezers. Another would be to detach balance complete from the cock and take a look at pivot under high maginfication.  Regs 
    • Ahhh, yes.  I hadn’t thought of that.  I’ve serviced quite a few of these and the first time I didn’t realise it was a ships strike pattern!  Ha ha, confused me totally until I realised.
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hi Mike, I did, thanks. Found this clip that was really helpful:   It says Seth Thomas but it's actually the same Hermle I've been working on. I'd had it working correctly all along but hadn't noticed that the lever with the sprung end stops the hammer a bit short of the bell on the second ding at the end of the half-past sequence. If only I'd put the bell on when testing, rather than just looking at the hammer, my ears would have told me it was working,  even if my eyes didn't!  
×
×
  • Create New...