Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Guys,

I'm working on a Ball 999B 16s PW; serial 1B7401 .  The balance staff is broken as is the hour hand.  I can't find any information on replacement parts for either, with one exception.  I read on a forum that the more common 992B movement has the same staff as the 999B.  If they are the same, I think that Dave's has it, but he could not confirm if this is the case.  Does anyone know if this is true; or otherwise have a lead for obtaining a new balance staff.

Also, Dave has hands that are similar that are for an Elgin 16s.  Without knowing the diameter of the holes on Dave's hands, does anyone know if they fit my watch (or if you have another source for hands that will fit the Ball).  I looked at esslinger and cas ker but didn't find anything.

Thanks guys.

ham hands.png

ball mvt.png

ball elgin hand.JPG

Posted

the easiest way to tell what staff you need is to remove the staff you already have. Then if it's like a 992B staff it should be a friction staff so be careful and don't knock out the blue hub it frictions into.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks guys.  I wondered what the blue hub signified.  I found  a reference and diagram for removing the friction fit balance staff.  Here's the link to the chicago school of watchmaking chapter that discusses it.  http://www.rdrop.com/~jsexton/watches/csw/les15/index.html#:~:text=It is quickly recognizable by,as in figure 15-8.  I was looking forward to using my lathe to cut off the hub, but it looks like this will be easier.

So my plan is to send a picture to Dave to see if the 992B staff matches up.  Does anyone have a diagram of said staff?  Esslinger shows it in stock but it has no diagram.

Enjoy the weekend.

chicago chapter.png

Posted

Just a reminder this is watch repair there are lots and lots and lots of variations. Your friction staff is a Waltham friction staff in the image up above requires special parts for your staking set. Hamilton used a different arrangement like the image below. Even though there's a groove showed in the staff the 992B does not have. So you can see the hub on the left staff in the middle and how they would look together. The reason for this particular example in the book was that they were some watches that they had upgraded the friction staff and they put the groups of people with no beyond the blued hub what was going on but on the watches like the 992B they didn't do the

image.png.d15e282d6ffd86490eda74a447c20b97.png

5 hours ago, arron said:

So my plan is to send a picture to Dave to see if the 992B staff matches up.  Does anyone have a diagram of said staff?  Esslinger shows it in stock but it has no diagram.

Dimensions would be better because there are some minor variations.

For instance of the friction staff's there are three of them at least for the 16 size 2 of them are the same for size with the pivot difference in the 992B only comes in one size

image.png.08d1f8d82e85e70bb4cd9388633d85ef.png

So visually though staffs will look identical casually at least.

So here's what your hub looks like with the Hamilton staff. As you see is a lot easier to work with them the Waltham all you have to do is support the blued steel part and gently knock out the friction staff from the other side of course

image.png.e647cddf6f467d2f13faa8bf9d2ebc37.png

In other words on the staking set it will look like this.

image.png.4c5f85e39db47a8dd6f0dd80e7994dd5.png

A picture of the staff

image.png.80f30e10a2381d5e32bdbd7b447392f8.png

A picture of measuring the staff which why would I do such a stupid thing is measured the staff? Because there's only 1992B staff there's no need to measure except there does seem to be some minor variations. I have a suspicion that some aftermarket staffs are not made quite the right dimensions and then they will not friction in the hub there too big or occasionally get one that loose because somebody drove a big staff in when they shouldn't have

image.png.d33632fe8e7deb96c1e00d00410f1db5.png

Here's a picture testing the staff in the balance hole jewel even though there's only one size it's still nice to check before it's in the balance

image.png.3d03ba039650d467c2cb0fb2fcfbf4e3.png

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

@JohnR725 that's very helpful.  I appreciate the time you took to give those instructions and post the pictures.  below is a picture of my staff, which looks identical to the ones you posted.  The approx measurements I got are: .772 on the left part of the staff; .715 on the right side of the hub; the hub is 1.107; and the overall length (minus the broken pivot) is 5.248; which seem to line up with the measurements you posted.  I didn't think to measure the pivot, which I'll do if there's enough of one left on the staff.  Thanks again.

IMG_8655.JPG

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well I spoke too soon. Here's where I am now with this issue. I replaced the date jumper and all seemed to function correctly. Fully wound and only in the movement holder, no dial or hands, I let it sit untouched for two days. Both nights it advanced the date. The second night it might have been just shy of fully advanced. Seemed as though I fixed it, so I reassembled the watch. Three nights in a row the date did not advance. Once I pull the crown it does. So you might think that it's the dial interfering, but here's the weird thing. If I advance the date during the day to 11:57p and watch it get to 12:00:30a the date flips with gusto. So here's what I'm thinking and could use your council. I installed a new Swiss mainspring. I used Moebius 8217 braking grease on the barrel walls. It seems to wind quite a bit before slipping, but does slip.  I've read that the 7750 really needs Kluber p125 as a braking grease.  Do you think it just doesn't have enough power after a few to several hours of sitting before the date change? Here are the TG numbers after service:  Rate +1s/d,    Amp 301,    BE 0.0ms   
    • I've managed with the ones I have but 1.8 mm would be better. 
    • Parts weren’t readily interchangeable when this watch was made, and almost every part was adjusted by hand to fit the rest of the parts in that specific watch. That said, it can save time to harvest a part from a donor movement so you can modify it to fit a similar movement, rather than try to make the part from scratch.  With that in mind, it is possible that the click from this watch was removed for use in another watch. I doubt that the other missing parts were taken for use as donor parts. The cannon pinion would be removed properly, rather than snapping it off with the centre wheel arbour and pin inside it.  The Maltese cross stop works were probably removed by a lazy or less knowledgeable watchmaker servicing the watch.  It is very common to encounter otherwise functional watches (including very high end pieces) that are missing their stop work because a previous watchmaker didn’t know how to set it up when reassembling the movement, or was too lazy to bother and knew that the customer would probably never notice.  It is possible that the stop work parts were taken to be fitted to a watch that was missing them.  Best Regards, Mark
    • I posted a link to another video where he takes it a step further and uses the pins to set and adjust rate as well as positional error.  Alex doesn’t manipulate the stud angle after he pushes it in but I find it makes a difference in the spring concentricity and bend.  Amex also doesn’t use the pin manipulation to adjust positional discrepancies.   
    • Brilliant! Very commendable! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...