Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

here is what I got today from the company:

 

Dear Buyer :

 

your order has send

 

Because of the effects of the new coronavirus, item will delivery delay

 

Remark: Because of the effects of the new coronavirus, our European and American warehouses had to close , so send item from China .

 

Delivery time : 15-25 working days 

 

if you any problem, please keep in touch !

zahqn24078

Posted

I think shipping from China was expected (at least for my part). Resultant long shipping time also expected. I don't see any changes on the site, so they're not backtracking on anything. Am I correct in my assumption that there was no tracking information (or even a start date for the 15-20 business days) that came with that response?

Posted

LOL  that would be my kind of luck. There are no free lunches I guess.  I'll give it a little more time and then I guess I'll bite the bullet and buy one from Amscope. Two recent watch guys that I've gotten to know both use the Amscope at 8 inch height. I'm getting neck surgery soon so I'll be out of watch fixing shape for a while anyway so once I heal enough to start back fixin' I'll get one. 

Posted

Hopefully your credit card has good fraud protection, and you're able to get your money back. That really sucks. I was ready to pull the trigger on a half dozen of them for me and a few others who were looking for similar equipment.

Posted

I'm not abandoning the ship just yet but for the 99 I spent I should be able to use it even if and when I but one from Amscope. I would get one from Amscope now if it weren't for the upcoming surgery. But if this one doesn't come by the time I am ready for one I'll get the one from Amscope. 

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Good evening,

Before i hit the purchase button i wanted to run this by those with more experience with watch repair than me.  My only concern about this purchase is whether the "working distance" of 4 inches is sufficient to do what needs to be done to a watch under the scope.  I did read several pages of the string of posts where Lee gave his review of the scope that sits on a boom and has much greater working distance (perhaps as great as 20 cm, i think).  I like the zoom function on this one, the mag power range, and the fact that i could take pictures down the road if i wanted. is the working distance sufficient to do watch repair?  thanks for your thoughts.  141453620_trinocularscope.thumb.PNG.0d519e40b95ef126945bb3f63cc0fe89.PNG

 

Posted

From my notes, 4" is a bit short. That's about how long some of the longer screwdrivers are, and then also need to get the movement in a holder under there AND have some space to move around. 8" seems to be the working distance of choice.

Posted

The specs for this microscope are pretty standard. Most of us gain more working distance by sacrificing some magnification. This is done by adding a Barlow lens to the objective lens. A 0.5X Barlow lens would halve your magnification but double your working distance. I use a similar spec basic microscope with a 0.7X Barlow lens.

Posted

I have an amscope and it is set up for minimal magnification.  I do not work on watches with it, but rather have it over my watchmaker's lathe.  I have begun to ponder the idea of using it for working on watches themselves.  But, for now, I am doing ok with a loupe.

I have had this scope for a long time...long before returning to watches.  It does not maintain focus as you zoom, but that is fine.  Zoom in...refocus.

2021-05-08 19_07_10-Photos.png

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

There are two things that keep me from watchmaking on a daily basis. One is that my desk is completely covered in electronics junk and papers for work (hopefully the former is finally debugged and installed soon... this is getting old). The other is I'm having a hard time with my optics. I have a clip-on loupe that is functional, but gets in the way and is both limited and cumbersome. I've been trying to find other, increasingly expensive options, and every time it's like I'm throwing money down the Crevasse of Futility. I think I'm about to finally pull the trigger on an AmScope, and need a nudge to put me over the edge.

I was wondering if someone so equipped could take a short video, or even just photos, from the [i]outside[/i] (what I would see if I were sitting/standing next to you) of a stereo microscope in use in the most general of use cases; i.e. movement in holder, screwdriver in hand, doing something ultra-typical like assembly/disassembly. Greatly appreciated.

Edited by spectre6000
Posted

LOL I lost the handle on this thread so I couldn't get back to ya'll. I contacted my bank and got my 99.00 returned, yay! So I bit the bullet and bought an Amscope one.  It looks like the one in LiitleWatchShop's picture. I also made sure that I got the 0.5X Barlow lens so that I have all the working distance that I need. You could raise it even higher then 8" if you wanted or needed to and then can zoom in and refocus. I had neck surgery right after i got it ( imagine that) so I have not had a lot of time to use it. That's like getting a bike for Christmas and there is 4 feet of snow out there. There is a learning curve with it so I don't do normal assembly or disassembly with it but I have used it for more detailed work: like hairspring, cleaning and inspecting jewels and such. The clarity is amazing, simply amazing. It really is taking things to an entire new level of workmanship. I normally use a 10x to look at the condition of pivots for example and seeing the pivots under this shows them so clearly that it makes cleaning them so much better and easier.  I did get the 144 light and the camera. I have it hooked up to a laptop but haven't done much with that as it takes a little time navigating the menus to get done what I want done. The software came with it btw. If you have the money then this really is a great addition to your capabilities. 

  • Like 2
Posted

I'm glad that worked out in the end. Thanks for being the guinea pig. What are the odds you feel like taking an "action shot"? I still really want to see what the working position ends up looking like with one of these. I'm about ready to pull the trigger, and I'm pretty confident that's what will push me over the edge.

Posted

here are 2 pics and a vid. shot with Samsung phone off of computer screen. Not nearly the quality of resolution that you get while looking in the eye cups. But it might give you a little idea of what you can see. I could zoom out and see the whole what if I wanted but I couldn't get the camera focused properly. I have to work on that. 

20210511_135147[1].jpg

20210511_135158[1].jpg

Posted

Thank you. That flavor of glamor shot is extraordinarily enticing, but I was hoping to see a photo of you working. I'm interested in tool clearances, posture, and that sort of thing. The practical aspects of it. The physicality of working on watch movements with a stereo microscope.

Posted

trying to show that is hard spectre6000. I can see what I'm doing while looking through the lens but I can't seem to be able to capture it on the screen as well. I'll try some more for ya. 

Posted

Maybe someone can answer this question: Would you use a stereo microscope for basic things like assembly/disassembly? Does it replace a loupe? I'm less than happy with my optics situation, and this seems like an answer, but I hate the idea of throwing money at a non-solution to a real problem. It [i]seems[/i] like I could do just about everything with a stereo microscope, but that seems too good to be true. Is that the case?

Posted
31 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

Would you use a stereo microscope for

While I only use mine for lathe work, I see the utility of using it for watch work.  I regularly go to the stereo to inspect something that is challenging with a loupe.  What I HAVE NOT DONE is to actually manipulate a screwdriver and tweezer under the scope.  That is where working distance comes to play.  I plan to try it because eyesight will only get worse...need a plan for the future.

Posted
1 hour ago, spectre6000 said:

Maybe someone can answer this question: Would you use a stereo microscope for basic things like assembly/disassembly? Does it replace a loupe? I'm less than happy with my optics situation, and this seems like an answer, but I hate the idea of throwing money at a non-solution to a real problem. It [i]seems[/i] like I could do just about everything with a stereo microscope, but that seems too good to be true. Is that the case?

I've had my microscope for several years. I used it mainly in my dental lab for examining and finishing crown and bridgework. And also for working on the occasional SMD circuit boards.

As I'm planning on retiring, I brought my microscope home to do watch repair work. But so far I've only used it for examining jewels, pivots, oiling pallets and adjusting hairsprings.

Would I use it for all my repair work? I don't know. Maybe if I get a bench mounted, articulated scope arm, I might. I just can't find the correct furniture for a comfortable working posture with the scope. It either too high or too low.

Is it possible to do all routine work with a scope? Yes, I think it's possible. I've met dentists who do everything under a microscope. Before industrial automation, thousands of factory workers assembled PCBs under a microscope, 8 hours a day.

I know my answer is not much help. You'll have to get one to find out for yourself if you could adapt your working style to microscope work. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I got a scope a few weeks ago and played around with the position and orientation for ages.  Because it looks directly down it's hard to use a screwdriver as your hand and actual screwdriver get in the way.  I tried to angle the scope a few degrees to get around this; I've had no luck with that.  My particular scope can angle but I get a bit of gimbal lock with my prefered placement which makes it impractical.  Also, for disassembly / assembly I find a loupe much easier and quicker to use because with a scope you're always adjusting the depth.

However, OMG, the scope is amazing.  Here are some of the ways I've used it...

  1. Opening / closing shock springs, great to make sure you're not putting too much pressure on them
  2. Oiling, really easy to make sure you've got the correct amount of oil on your oiler and that it goes in the correct place
  3. Inspection, obvious really, my scope does 3.5x to 20x and keeps the focus all the way down.  Nice and clear but at 20x+ consider using extra light or a light ring attachment
  4. Cleaning dials, when you want to clean up to printed text but not over it you can be sure that your swab doesn't touch delicate parts.
  5. Fitting hairspring stud pins.  WOW, using curved tweezers you can place the pin perfectly in the hole and drive it home.  A few nights ago I was 20 minutes trying this with a 15x loupe but with the scope it went in first time
  6. Placing bridges, this one surprised me but after placing a bridge (especially pallet) you can see if the pivots are in the jewels/holes.  It gives you loads of confidence that you've got everything correctly seated
  7. Screws, yes, on occasion with really tiny screws this can be useful.  I've resorted to this on a tiny thumb-nail-sized ladies movement

I've got my scope on a long boom arm which allows me to quickly move it over my normal working position, do something, then push it away again.  I think this is the key for me, a clean work space, always at hand, move the tool to the job, not the job to the tool (as my dad would say).  The base of the scope is large and heavy but I'm going to remove that and bolt it directly to my bench.

My posture when using the scope feels wrong but my wife says that it's perfect and that I have a perfectly straight back and neck.

In conclusion, I'd never go back to not having a scope.  The price of it (£350) is totally worth the amount of time it saves you.

  • Like 2
Posted

I must admit I would lost without the microscopes. I have one set up above my lathe and one on my bench. My eyesight is poor so I use my bench microscope for checking to see that the pallet folk pinion is seated correctly and also for jewel and pinion inspections.My lathe Microscope I use it for making staffs or removing part of the staff before removing or any small delicate items. 

Posted

I use my microscope to take spring bars off, because why not?  I can see exactly what I'm doing and there's good light.

I have the two arm stand, which has more degrees of freedom in positioning the microscope head than in some of the other stands.  I normally have it angled forward slightly.  This way a screwdriver doesn't obscure the view of a screw.  Having to look straight down only would be very limiting.

 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The post below contains the link. If you don't already have a discord account it will take you to the registration screen.  Registration is free.   https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/31653-mark/?do=findComment&comment=279066
    • HWGIKE#57 Valex FEF 190 15 jewels Swiss lever full service and repair This one was waiting for a balance staff replacement in my cabinet parts and case cleaned up with a new balance staff and a 4th wheel as the original 4th wheel had a broken pivot for the off center second hand. I never attempted a balance staff replacement before however I received a Bergeon Molfres (i was hunting it for about 2 years) and with the help of it I managed to remove the old staff and riveted the new one in. It also received a new MS, crystal and the hole for the MS arbor was also tightened. With the new MS now it has an acceptable performance meaning that the amplitude goes up to 280 fully wound, has an acceptable beat error and I have the two nice lines but only dial up, dial down is not as nice and I could not figure out as why. I have the two lines but the amplitude is dropping to around 230 and the lines are a bit hairy. Both dial up and dial down the lines just go up and down without seemingly any pattern. I cleaned the movement two times, and then a 3rd time pegged out the main plate and train bridge holes but made no change. Both the HS collet and the roller table was too lose on the new staff... I did not count how many times I took the balance cock off to sort out the HS collet, the roller table and the beat error, somebody before me also shortened the HS by pushing it out a bit and it seems every time somebody is messing with the end of the HS the protruding bit is most of the time twisted bent etc. This one was probably one of the most challenging repair and service. I might take the new MS out and clean it lubricate it as I just pushed the new one in to the barrel from the retaining ring. Plus started to re-read the theory of the escapement and how to analyse the graph on the timing machine: Greiner Chronografic Record manual. I am also thinking to put the watch on a 24 hour long run with the eTimer SW it once helped me to figure out what was wrong with a watch. There is an interesting part of the Greiner record manual talking about the pallets and the end shake of the balance and pallet staff. Maybe this is my issue? Who could that possibly identify? After a few years now I am still without a clue how could watchmakers make parts I can only see with my microscope or how could/can they carry out complicated services impossible to do.. real magic..... .... ..... before I sent this post while the pics were uploading I had an idea, i was browsing the possible outcomes on the timing machine I had one for magnetism..... so I demagnetized the movement and it is not hairy now.... two really nice lines 0.2 ms beat error still a bit wavy, but a lot lot better..... argh....  
    • Hi there, welcome here.  
    • yes the advertising revenue should generate money. The question is how much money? Then as far as the cost of the website goes that's relatively easy to determine? all you would have to do to grasp costs and profitability would be to go to the link below and you can actually get a website for free try it out for free I believe you get no advertising initially. They also talk about that they'll help you out they have marketing tools and some sort of paid subscription or something. So I guess were shopping for a whatever just ask them what would a maybe could use this one as an example in other words it's going to look basically identical to this is going to have advertising a paid subscriptions what's it going to cost? After all they want to sell or give us a message board like this they should bill answer the questions as they're the people who did the software for this. Yes they really said you can have a free discussion group at least to start. https://invisioncommunity.com/ I was curious about the monthly supporter thing where exactly do we find that on this message board? A quick search I'm not finding it so obviously I'm not looking in the right place?
    • Help me out here, but with all the advertising on this site (which I don't mind) wouldn't it pay for itself or even make money for the owner ???
×
×
  • Create New...