Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So what is your absolute favourite watch or clock that you own ? It doesn't matter if you wear it or not ( not that you would wear a clock, but then i anticipate some unusual answers ) The "ONE" that you would not part with under any circumstances and why.

Posted

My Omega Seamaster aqua terra.  It's just me, very understated but classy ( not that I'm classy). I don't like dive watches, the bezel puts me off or any kind of bling. I prefer indices to numbers. I don't have any other luxuries, not into clothes, seldom go for expensive meals etc. So it's my little treat to myself. 

Not my watch but exactly the same, just got home and taken it off. 

Screenshot_20240520_164402_Chrome.jpg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, RichardHarris123 said:

My Omega Seamaster aqua terra.  It's just me, very understated but classy ( not that I'm classy). I don't like dive watches, the bezel puts me off or any kind of bling. I prefer indices to numbers. I don't have any other luxuries, not into clothes, seldom go for expensive meals etc. So it's my little treat to myself. 

Not my watch but exactly the same, just got home and taken it off. 

Screenshot_20240520_164402_Chrome.jpg

Its a nice classy watch Rich, the only problem i have with it.......if you know me well enough then you know what that is. I've already forgiven you for it though 🙂

Posted (edited)

I don't wear or own a watch. I have 12 clocks in my home but I only wind one per week, each week it is a different one. I'm funny that way. 🤣

Edited by oldhippy
  • Like 5
Posted
1 hour ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Yes, Swatch, booooooooooo!!!

Only joking mate, well mostly 🙂. 3 years ago i wanted one and didn't know any different. Funny how a little knowledge can completely change your view of things. 

34 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I don't wear or own a watch. I have 12 clocks in my home but I only wind one per week, each week it is a different one. I'm funny that way. 🤣

Do you have that special one though, that means more to you than all of the others ?

1 hour ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Yes, Swatch, booooooooooo!!!

Personal items can mean so much more than what they actually are or what they are worth. Those aspects dont even enter into the equation if its a gift or an inherited item. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Nothing special to the horological world, but this is my travel watch. For whatever reason, this watch has accompanied me through airport security more often than my appendix and gall bladder. I feel as if i need this with me as much as my passport.

image.thumb.png.5d13f7d35ad2b5ad744602ab8af90ebb.png

  • Like 4
Posted
24 minutes ago, eccentric59 said:

Nothing special to the horological world, but this is my travel watch. For whatever reason, this watch has accompanied me through airport security more often than my appendix and gall bladder. I feel as if i need this with me as much as my passport.

image.thumb.png.5d13f7d35ad2b5ad744602ab8af90ebb.png

Good luck charm ?

  • Like 1
Posted

One I have and it's a French Strike on a bell with Garnish worth around £1,000. I'll take a photo of it tomorrow so you can see it. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

One I have and it's a French Strike on a bell with Garnish worth around £1,000. I'll take a photo of it tomorrow so you can see it. 

Please OH, we should all be proud of our collections what ever they are. If we can't show them off here then we can't show them anywhere. Our favourite gives us a story to tell of why we love it, that story also tells others something about ourselves. These are some of the things that make our forum and our community so amazing .

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

When you have the matching set it adds to the value. I bought it because I like the colour of the case. 

There is a name for a timepiece and set like this OH, i forget what its called now 🤔. Thats lovely OH

15 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

There is a name for a timepiece and set like this OH, i forget what its called now 🤔

Got it garnitures.

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

When you have the matching set it adds to the value. I bought it because I like the colour of the case. 

Have you ever worked on it ?

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

There is a name for a timepiece and set like this OH, i forget what its called now 🤔. Thats lovely OH

It is called a Garnish 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/20/2024 at 7:37 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

The "ONE" that you would not part with under any circumstances

So in other words if you basically ran out of money and you discovered that your beautiful Rolex watch was worth way more than you ever imagined you wouldn't sell the watch?

  • Like 1
Posted

I've grown very fond of my Longines 30L. Nice and simple, elegant, and very accurate. 
But if I had to choose one, it would be one of the pocket watches I first started working on. 

And this is is my favourite a 16s Waltham Riverside (Model 1899) made in 1903. 
19 jewels, Breguet overcoil, and adjusted to 5 positions. The centre wheel is rose gold plated.
The damaskeening and perlage are stunning (and very difficult to photograph, the pic doesn't do it justice). 
When I last cleaned it, I wore it for a week (on an Albert chain of course). It was amazingly accurate, about 1s to 2s /day as I remember. Not bad for a 120 year old watch (and me as a learner).

3.thumb.jpg.948bf939357d199720d2900506e19a41.jpg

2.thumb.jpg.96cd63abf097bf459c6a51c32cd894fa.jpg

1.thumb.jpg.5d7c2010cd357616d57e4d55b17e82d5.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
34 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

So in other words if you basically ran out of money and you discovered that your beautiful Rolex watch was worth way more than you ever imagined you wouldn't sell the watch?

👍You got it John, but i can think of other worse scenarios that may sway a decision. I know people that have sold things when they were broke and then regretted it in the future and wished they had found a way around it. Everybody has different sentimental attitudes, different thresholds, limits to what makes them capable of doing something. An example is my cousin who is not at all sentimental and parted with my grandfather's watch which he gave to me via my mum. But yes that comment you made is the basic idea, just a timepiece that you value the most, and you are least likely to part with.

3 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I've grown very fond of my Longines 30L. Nice and simple, elegant, and very accurate. 
But if I had to choose one, it would be one of the pocket watches I first started working on. 

And this is is my favourite a 16s Waltham Riverside (Model 1899) made in 1903. 
19 jewels, Breguet overcoil, and adjusted to 5 positions. The centre wheel is rose gold plated.
The damaskeening and perlage are stunning (and very difficult to photograph, the pic doesn't do it justice). 
When I last cleaned it, I wore it for a week (on an Albert chain of course). It was amazingly accurate, about 1s to 2s /day as I remember. Not bad for a 120 year old watch (and me as a learner).

3.thumb.jpg.948bf939357d199720d2900506e19a41.jpg

2.thumb.jpg.96cd63abf097bf459c6a51c32cd894fa.jpg

1.thumb.jpg.5d7c2010cd357616d57e4d55b17e82d5.jpg

I'm not a pocket watch fan just yet Mike but that is gorgeous both inside and out and the fact that it was there at the start of your journey and proves testament to your dedication, skill and found forte makes it extra special. These are the ones that can be passed down the family line placed in the hands of someone that will continue to cherish it. Beautiful timepiece 👍

  • Like 1
Posted
23 hours ago, oldhippy said:

That Waltham is at the top of the tree when it comes to their models. Lovely looking movement. 

I really must get into pocket watches , its something that i haven’t thought much about. I imagine after tinkering with mens and ladies wristwatch movements for a while that the new scale of pocketwatches will be something nice to get used to. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...