Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Yesterday evening I was trolling the net ( as we all do)  when I stumbled on this vid. Last month there was a debate on are Chinese tools worth purchasing and I gave my thoughts that being the biggest differences is the materials used to make them and also they are not built to the Swiss fine tolerances. The tool he shows to compare with the Seitz jeweling tool I am sure is Chinese and shows the point I was tring to make. 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIqQcVLgtB0

Edited by clockboy
Posted

This vid was a bit of a surprise to me, showing the difference in quality between Horia and Bergeon jewelling tools.

For those who worship Bergeon, I suggest you don't watch it 🤣

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

This is an interesting video. 

In one aspect, the guy is wrong, though:

at 19:35 - 20.30, he say that the spindle won't move back up when using the screw-type-micrometer attachment for the Seitz (instead of the lever). This is false. It seems like he remove the spring when installing the adapter. But you can/should leave that in. The spindle will then move back up like it should - and like the Horia. I've done this several times -- in fact, it's the only way that I actually use the Seitz for jewelling purposes.

See picture and GIF as "proof".

20240526_194349.thumb.jpg.1a9b68c39c2dcce551713fa4d8bba8cd.jpg

20240526_194524_1.gif.c5bb17bf2ec255a28691d877bcc0e950.gif

 

Another aspect that I found very interesting is the question about the anvil size. At 14:06 onwards, he nicely demonstrates what happens when you use an anvil that has a hole that is too large and too far away from the jewel: it makes the jewel pop out prematurely. This is, in fact, a situation I've faced a few times and didn't understand why it was happening (and hence, I abandoned the end-shake adjustment). I understand this now and will be able to do better next time.

It is true that there are too few anvils in the (normal) Seitz set --- (but as he correctly points out, one can use pushers on the bottom side to increase the options [if you have the threaded plug to close the bottom hole of the tool from the underside, see his video at 2:45]). 

 

 

Edited by Knebo
Posted

I've got one of the cheap Chinese jewelling kits due to arrive any day; I am rather curious just how good it will be? Around 130- for the tool with 24 pairs of pushers & anvils.

 

 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did you watch the whole video? Once Alex has set the stud, he first corrects the best error, then checks that the hairspring coils are breathing concentrically, then turns the stud to centre the hairspring between the open regulator pins.  He then checks that the regulator can traverse the terminal curve without disturbing the hairspring. A correction is needed, which he performs.  He then reinstalls the balance and re-centres the hairspring between the regulator pins, and verifies that the regulator traverses the terminal curve without disturbing the hairspring.  Finally, he demonstrates how to close the gap between pins.  He then recaps the whole process, fleshing out more detail. If you follow this process, you have correctly set up the regulator pins, and are ready to set the rate of the watch.  If you are interested in learning more about the effects of the regulator pin spacing on positional rates etc, you can read any literature regarding regulator pins. The etachron system makes adjusting beat, centering the hairspring between the regulator pins and adjusting the gap between the pins very convenient, but the same rules that apply to old style regulator pins apply to the etachron system.  This video explains the basics :    I hope that helps, Mark
    • Some photos of the angles you are talking about, and the changes you are seeing to coil spacing etc. would be really useful. Part of your problem could be that you are closing the pins too far and pinching the hairspring. Adjusting the pin separation should not affect amplitude. Nor should it change the coil separation.
    • Did you try it on a Rolex ref. 16600 specifically? Congrats on the nice condition of the movement in your watch. Even so, remember to check the rotor play or those marks around the main plate may start to build up.
    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
×
×
  • Create New...