Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking to replace the case back seal on a watch, when I removed the case back the seal was twisted and crimped in 2 places. The seal looks flat, but when I've looked for replacements I've noticed there are flat and o-ring style seals available. Would I be best going for a flat seal again? Is the original seal actually flat or is it a completely worn out o-ring?! Do they come in different thicknesses? Is there a way of finding the original part numbers of case and strap parts like there is with movement parts?

Posted

What is the watch? It's hard to help if we don't know what the watch is.

13 minutes ago, Chief said:

Would I be best going for a flat seal again? 

If that was the original seal, yes.

15 minutes ago, Chief said:

Is the original seal actually flat or is it a completely worn out o-ring?!

Don't know unless you can provide pics.

15 minutes ago, Chief said:

 Do they come in different thicknesses?

Yes they do.  Have a look here https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/watch-gaskets

16 minutes ago, Chief said:

Is there a way of finding the original part numbers of case and strap parts like there is with movement parts?

Possibly, but we would need to know what the watch is to help.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, mikepilk said:

What is the watch? It's hard to help if we don't know what the watch is.

If that was the original seal, yes.

Don't know unless you can provide pics.

Yes they do.  Have a look here https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/watch-gaskets

Possibly, but we would need to know what the watch is to help.

Sorry, I should have known to give some indication as to what it is! I've added pics of the seal and case back. The watch is a Citizen Promaster Wingman Temp. How would I go about identifying the correct parts for it? I've measured the case back diameter where the seal sits, but how would I know how thick the seal is to be?

PXL_20240522_192916350.jpg

PXL_20240522_193007517.jpg

PXL_20240522_192830036.jpg

Posted
Just now, RichardHarris123 said:

Measure the thickness or buy the selection. 

Thanks Richard, I think I will get a selection. But my question is, how do I know that the thickness of this seal is the correct thickness a new seal should be?Could this seal not be worn out and flattened? It's been in the watch for 20 years. I'm also after other parts which I can't seem to find like a bezel insert which is why I was asking where people source case parts from. Is there a way of seeing exploded diagrams of cases with part numbers?

Posted
14 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi @Chief  I have a copy of this manual picked up on the net but it’s too big to add the file it errors out so copy it to your system  from @rjenkinsgb link.  It does contain a lot of use full information apertaining to. Citizen watches.

I've downloaded it from the link! Looks like a really handy manual. However it doesn't help with sizing the case back seal. It does tell me it's a flat seal which is good! I think I'll go for an assorted pack from cousins and see how it goes!

  • Like 2
Posted
9 hours ago, Chief said:

Sorry, I should have known to give some indication as to what it is! I've added pics of the seal and case back. The watch is a Citizen Promaster Wingman Temp. How would I go about identifying the correct parts for it? I've measured the case back diameter where the seal sits, but how would I know how thick the seal is to be?

PXL_20240522_192916350.jpg

PXL_20240522_193007517.jpg

PXL_20240522_192830036.jpg

With something like this a gasket seal for instance if i cant find the relevant information i would use instinct to decide what fits and works best. You have the original gasket ( well maybe its original or hopefully it is )so its fairly easy to determine what material to use. Shape , for that i would look at the gasket seatings, are there grooves or recesses in either the case back or case or both, what shape are the grooves, flat or round etc, how does the gasket sit and behave in those seatings. Next thickness,that is going to be a bit of a guess, especially if the gasket is a soft one that has been heavily compressed over time. This is where a selection is going to come in handy, personally i would be choosing one that is giving me the feel of compression as its coming into contact with both of the mating surfaces. But not so much that the gasket is going to squash out and become distorted, again this is guesswork and feel is required with the allowance of compression over time, something you may want to check after six months. This part is a little moot as without a pressure test, good water resistance is not assured so the watch needs to treated as such and not as if it were a new diving watch ( not that i would treat any new diving watch as if were ). What you want to expect from your efforts is a little accidental rain catch, if you want more water resistance guarantee then a professional gasket replacement and pressure test is what you should be seeking which will be more than the value of this watch. Coincidentally i have the same watch, been searching for a stem for it for a while now. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Coincidentally i have the same watch, been searching for a stem for it for a while now. 

Oh really! Maybe you can help further then. I'm going to restore the case, it's not in bad condition but I want it to look original. The underside of the case has a high polished finish but the top looks brushed. The bezel also looks brushed. Do you know if it should be a brushed finish on top and bezel? Or should it be polished like the under side?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...