Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Eyup watch people. Thinking about the maintenance of where the energy begins, in particular reducing friction between the barrel and the arbor. Does anyone pay attention to this area ? Does anyone polish the bearings of the barrel or polish / burnish the arbor ?

Posted

Although I don’t really have a clue I have been thinking about this too. I have seen and read several things mentioning polishing/smoothing the barrel base and rarely the barrel cap/top. I haven’t ever seen or heard of anything about chucking up the arbor in a lathe and burnishing the arbor bearing points. I suppose it may be one of these things that come under diminishing returns for the effort involved. However not being professional I maybe see the time investment differently. It will be interesting if/when the professionals chime in.

 

Tom

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

Although I don’t really have a clue I have been thinking about this too. I have seen and read several things mentioning polishing/smoothing the barrel base and rarely the barrel cap/top. I haven’t ever seen or heard of anything about chucking up the arbor in a lathe and burnishing the arbor bearing points. I suppose it may be one of these things that come under diminishing returns for the effort involved. However not being professional I maybe see the time investment differently. It will be interesting if/when the professionals chime in.

 

Tom

I've watched Chris Soto burnish and polish arbors. Reason I've asked, I'm in the middle of servicing an Oris 291 which is in fair shape for its age, but i thought i would polish up some pivots, not burnish but polish. I know this is frowned upon as potentially the polishing medium can embed itself into the steel and charge it up with compound. The barrel arbor had a dull look about it and some very fine marks, so popped it into a dremel and charged up some wood stick with autosol to polish it. After rinsing it, the before and after difference is night and day, testing for barrel and arbor friction between some tweezers has made a huge difference but the play is the same. So wondering if the arbor steel is hard enough to resist being being charged by the polishing compound, obviously burnishing is a better idea but most folk don't own a lathe. Probably not necessary to polish the plate arbor points just where the arbors meets the barrel and lid as this where the barrel unwinds itself and needs the least friction.

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Posted (edited)

I don't usually do it but I just burnished and polished a barrel arbor a couple of weeks ago. The upper arbor was rusted and pitted, so it was a necessary job.

I chucked it in the lathe and used the rough side of the pivot polisher first, then the smooth side. And finally polished it with autosol on a wooden popsicle stick.

It still had some deep pits but that was all I dared to polish. I also used a smooth broach to smoothen the barrel cap hole before polishing it with a bamboo toothpick. 

Edited by HectorLooi
Typo
  • Like 3
Posted

Hi Rich,

Yes, You can polish the arbor pivots and the barrel holes, but it will be beter to burnish them. The normal reason one will do it is if there is bad surface by the manufaturing or signs of degrdation of the surface due butting from no lubrication or hard particles for example, and it is done to prevent the bearings from fast wear when working in such state of surfaces. Othervice, do not expect significant change in amplitude because of the polishing. This is what I think, but You can try before/after with no change in other conditions and make own conclusions.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...