Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

My watch had a fall and some pieces fell out onto the face. I have put all the push in hour markers back in but I can't find out what this piece is. The watch won't work and goes through an unwinding process when the winder is pulled outIMG_20240530_135555.thumb.jpg.1af1ecbb5c09414069fc3b4207231e9a.jpg

IMG_20240530_135522.jpg

IMG_20240530_135618.jpg

Posted

That’s the regulator arm off the balance cock by the looks of it. If the fall dislodged that I would think there will be much worse damage and you’ll need a watchmaker to repair.

 

Tom

  • Like 3
Posted

A couple of years ago I tried to repair one of these Rotary "skeleton" watches for a friend. It was a cheap Chinese movement and didn't seem designed to be taken apart. The metal was poor quality, which in a skeleton movement means lack of rigidity can mean parts falling off. From what I remember he dropped it and the pallet fell out.  As a replacement movement was only about £25, it wasn't worth trying to fix, and I just changed the movement.

I would suggest you identify the movement and see what a replacement costs.

At least they don't have the cheek to write "Swiss made" on the dial. 

Posted

Thanks all for the assistance, it is most appreciated. I was hoping it was a simple fix as the part was on the face after the fall. It does seem a shame that the watch states Rotary as the make and then made in Japan is marked on the back. It sounds like I need to identify in some way what model the works are. Does a replacement require the face taking apart etc?

Cheers Dave 

Posted

Actually, the regulator seems to be OK, needs  just to be placed on but it is not clear what has happened with the hairspring as now probably the studd carrier is hanging on it...

Posted
14 hours ago, djwilliams37 said:

 It does seem a shame that the watch states Rotary as the make and then made in Japan is marked on the back.

A Japanese movement will be better quality than the Chinese one I worked on. 

Can you provide a close-up pic of the back of the movement?

Posted

My first thoughts are, if you do need to remove the dial for whatever reason, i would want to be very careful about taking off those hands off with hand levers, a good level of support and protection for the works underneath, or hand pullers which i hate.

Posted

I had one of these my bench the top balance shock spring had become dislodged and had jammed itself into the case stem tube.. 

The problem was could not find a replacement spring so,had to modify a vintage spring I had in stock.. If I remember correctly the movement was a Chinese Seiko clone. 

Posted
18 hours ago, djwilliams37 said:

Thanks all for the assistance, it is most appreciated. I was hoping it was a simple fix as the part was on the face after the fall. It does seem a shame that the watch states Rotary as the make and then made in Japan is marked on the back. It sounds like I need to identify in some way what model the works are. Does a replacement require the face taking apart etc?

Cheers Dave 

I think it is this movement

https://miyotamovement.com/product/8N24/

That is Japanese.  I say that based on the picture.

I practiced very recently on a cheap Chinese skeleton (watch was $25 delivered the same day from Amazon on a Sunday that gives you an idea of how cheap) and bemoaned how bad was the center wheel retaining plate.  At the time I looked up a few other skeleton movements and thought they looked better constructed.  I distinctively remembered the shape of the Miyota retaining plate.

 

Posted
10 hours ago, djwilliams37 said:

Are you saying that you think the regulator can be placed back if the hair spring can be located and is in good condition? Where does the regulator arm sit in the works? 

Yes, the regulator can be put on it's place back, and this is for sure. What is not clear is the condition of the movement other parts, as what You describe seems frigthfull. You need to show pictures of the movement and try to explain more clear what is the movement behavior.

product_mU4tluDkbYAz2j3qXc_s1.thumb.png.0828906e39dc5875b4c518abebad407a.png

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi

Thanks again for all the assistance. It is indeed the Japanese 8n24 movement. I have taken a picture of the back of the movement which hopefully shows the area where the regulator sits. 

The watch hands do not move at all and the watch if wound rapidly unwinds if the winder is fully pulled out 

IMG_20240601_110925.jpg

Posted

Not sure if this close up of the front helps. I have found several 8n24 movements available on Ebay for £22 and above. Is it difficult to replace the face and hands onto a new movement 

IMG_20240601_112129.jpg

Posted

Sorry, You have some kind of major problem that causes that rapid unwinding, when stem is moved to hands setting position. Also the hairspring is badly deformed. As You don't have expirience in watch repairs, it will be much much easier for You to get new movement and repllace. It is easy to remove dial and hands, but measures needed to be taken to prevent them from deformation and damafe of appearence. You need to remove the second and minute nands only. Watch some videos to see how it is done.

Posted

There are plenty of 8n24 movements available but I think they are all Chinese copies. Most have the name Myota Japan on them but ship from China. Are these if copies worth purchasing? The prices vary from £20 upwards 

Posted

I am interested in the response by more knowledgeable forum members. 
I have been assuming that the movements @djwilliams37 is referring to are authentic. 
I assumed that for a couple of reasons:

the Japanese movements being made mostly of not all by machines and being fairly cheap as can be seen by the price of the final watches I am not sure the benefit from making fake movement would be there.  After all the market of people buying a few movement here and there can’t be that big vs companies actually making watches and sourcing the movements in bulk. 
 

On the same platforms I see the actual clones correctly label. So I expected the problem of fake to be more at the level of complete watches and/or Swiss movements 

 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Terrinecold said:

I am interested in the response by more knowledgeable forum members. 
I have been assuming that the movements @djwilliams37 is referring to are authentic. 
I assumed that for a couple of reasons:

the Japanese movements being made mostly of not all by machines and being fairly cheap as can be seen by the price of the final watches I am not sure the benefit from making fake movement would be there.  After all the market of people buying a few movement here and there can’t be that big vs companies actually making watches and sourcing the movements in bulk. 
 

On the same platforms I see the actual clones correctly label. So I expected the problem of fake to be more at the level of complete watches and/or Swiss movements 

 

 

China brings a few conundrums to mind, they do legitimately make parts, movements and assemble for the likes of Seiko etc. I have heard around that seiko movements are being copied in China, but if you consider how many sea-gull 1963 chronographs that are on the market that have never seen the inside of a sea-gull factory then the surprise goes away somewhat. There is also the possibility that these are surplus being sold by one of the many factories that make watches for micro brands. 
 

Tom

Posted

For now at least I will be optimistic and assume that when I buy such a movement they are genuine. Of course if someone was trying to pass something as a genuine ETA for $30 that is something else. 
 

 

Posted

Some of the copies are easy to spot as they have no manufacture named on them. Others have the correct information on them but when reading the given details another name is given for the manufacturer 

Posted

I have ordered an 8n24 from a Chinese supplier on Amazon. It looks like a genuine part. I will update when it arrives and I have fitted it. 

Many thanks too all who have helped me with this

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

As promised after finally getting round to tackling the watch repair here is an update of how I got on.

The new movement arrived and all looked okay and matched up with the existing works. I had problems separating the works from the plastic cage and face. The new works came with some miniature screws and a couple of small plates I eventually spotted these and figured they clamped the works to the plastic. I still couldn't remove the works or face. After sometime I managed to loosen the face and found it was clamped to the works via a prong running down from the face. Unfortunately there were 2 prongs and I managed to snap one off. 

I attempted to glue the hour markers back onto the face from the back but when reassembling the watch some came loose and I had to superglue them from the front using a very fine wire strand to apply a very small amount. 

The watch hands came off using a set of levers from Amazon for £5. I came up with a method for holding the miniature screws so I could get them into position. I made a loop in a strand of fine electrical wire and used this to hold the screw. I would never have managed without doing this. 

The watch hands took me a while to put back on and after watching a YouTube video several times and purchasing hand pressers from Amazon for £5. I finally managed to get them back on. The seconds hand was by far the most challenging due to its small size and delicacy. The watch has been running a few days now and keeping good time. 

Once again many thanks for your help. I don't think I would have got started without your help

 

IMG_20240806_104722.jpg

IMG_20240808_150420.jpg

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...