Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

 remember one video or other mentioning that tiny springs don’t do well in mesh baskets used to put parts in before using an ultrasonic machine. 
sure enough yesterday on my first parts cleaning the click spring for my st36 slipped partially into the mesh and was delicate to recover. 
So I wonder what is the alternative should I put the springs directly in the mason jar with the bridges?

Subsidiary questions which parts do you group in the same brass and mesh little baskets (see picture)

 

image.jpg

Answering part of my own question. Putting the springs into the mason jar directly was as dumb an idea as they come. 
 

I still have hope to find my click spring but not very high. 
 

After the cycle and after removing the different baskets and bridges. I emptied the washing fluid into another jar through a coffee filter. But still haven’t found it. I guess it is stuck in something by capillarity so there is still a chance to find it. 
 

 

Posted

Answering part of my own question. Putting the springs into the mason jar directly was as dumb an idea as they come. 
 

I still have hope to find my click spring but not very high. 
 

After the cycle and after removing the different baskets and bridges. I emptied the washing fluid into another jar through a coffee filter. But still haven’t found it. I guess it is stuck in something by capillarity so there is still a chance to find it. 
 

Update: found the click spring at the bottom of the wash jar. Very hard to see as that jar is murky

  • Like 1
Posted

I usually put them in mesh baskets like yours, but I have had them fall through the mesh.

They really don't need much cleaning. Rubbing with some Rodico, them a dip in some IPA would probably be sufficient. This is also what I do with the very smallest screws.

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, mikepilk said:

but I have had them fall through the mesh.

I used to do the same and had the same issue, but I had a cunning plan......  "as cunning as a fox what used to be Professor of Cunning at Oxford University but has moved on and is now working for the U.N. at the High Commission of International Cunning Planning."

I now use the same setup, but I place an old glass crystal from a ladies watch  on top on the spring inside the mesh basket, this prevents the spring from standing up and it cannot now slip through the mesh:

IMG_20240603_122241.thumb.jpg.2f55471b3632fc970d09485b78a5bd22.jpg

Edited by Waggy
  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Waggy said:

I used to do the same and had the same issue, but I have a cunning plan......  "as cunning as a fox what used to be Professor of Cunning at Oxford University but has moved on and is now working for the U.N. at the High Commission of International Cunning Planning."

I now use the same setup, but I place an old glass crystal from a ladies watch  on top on the spring inside the mesh basket, this prevents the spring from standing up and it cannot now slip through the mesh:

I agree that is very cunning. I will have to try that. As some of my springs completely vanished, "Like an old oak table".

Posted
1 minute ago, mikepilk said:

I will have to try that.

Been doing it for a while, can't remember if I thought of it or heard it somewhere, but works a treat.

Posted

Waggy - very cunning!  Never thought of that. I’ll try it.  Before I became wise to this ultrasonic risk, I  lost several small springs out of mesh baskets -gone forever.  I now just clean small springs by hand, avoiding the risk of the basket. It doesn’t take much time or effort.  The other parts I’ve lost in an ultrasonic cleaner are dial feet screws.  I always screw them into the plate very carefully, but have had several migrate out with the vibration of cleaning.  Now I check for retention of these screws when I take the plate out of the cleaner and before I do anything to the cleaning solution it came out of.  I learnt the hard way never to discard cleaning solution until you’re sure you’ve recovered all the parts that went in to it.  Obvious, I know. 

  • Like 1
Posted

My way works every time. My faithful little pot with it's screw on lid and inside Ronsonol lighter fluid put them in that, most muck will float off, take each one out,  put  on tissue paper and fold, the paper will absorb any liquid and you can use your blower just to make sure.  No more tiny springs flying all over the place or getting down on your hands and knees sweeping the floor. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

@oldhippy - yes, cleaning them by hand in solvent removes the risk and all the time searching for them when they wander.  I do the same for the very small screws. I also really like the coffee filter paper recovery technique, Richard - wish I’d thought of that before I sent a couple of dial feet screws down the drain one fateful day. 🙂

 

  • Like 1
Posted

On a slightly different note  I used to buy the filter paper from boots for wine/beer and filter the cleaning fluid and rinse, I had a gadget that consisted of two round pieces you placed the paper between the two parts and press down and it would fit into the top of the jar and with a jug poor and filter until it all went through.  

Posted

Small screws and springs always get hand washed in a weighing bottle with a little agitation from a fine artist's brush. (Seeing as I am a professional artist, I got loads of old brushes about, so there's that.)

image.png.6fca61daa1547ea2920014ed9cd9b623.png

 

Only those super heavy yoke springs that look like they came off the suspension of a '53 Ford go in the basket.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Zendoc said:

@oldhippy - yes, cleaning them by hand in solvent removes the risk and all the time searching for them when they wander.  I do the same for the very small screws. I also really like the coffee filter paper recovery technique, Richard - wish I’d thought of that before I sent a couple of dial feet screws down the drain one fateful day. 🙂

 

I use coffee filters to filter out large particulates, hairs etc from cleaning fluids, i put them inside a plastic funnel to keep the filter to shape. The fluid can be quite slow to drain through, i thought about getting a reusable mesh filter instead.

Screenshot_20240603-165526_eBay.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

That is another good tip. I dread to think how much the L & R cleaning and rince cost these days. I remember it used to be in 1 U S imperial gallon., which is not so much as the UK measurement. 

Posted
On 6/3/2024 at 6:04 PM, oldhippy said:

That is another good tip. I dread to think how much the L & R cleaning and rince cost these days. I remember it used to be in 1 U S imperial gallon., which is not so much as the UK measurement. 

Around  £12 - £13  per litre for L n R . The Elma stuff is a little bit cheaper more so if bought in the bigger 10 and 30 litre tubs which the  L n R doesn't seem to be available from Cousins. Which is all still cheaper or the same cost than if someone were buying multiple small tins of lighter fluid. 

Posted

I buy the Elma cleaners as Cousins sell them in 2.5L containers (£29.45+VAT). The L&R are only sold in bigger 3.8L containers(about £47+VAT). I use about half a jam jar of fluid and change after 5 watches. It's lasted me years and is similar in price to buying naphtha, but it cleans much better. So for anyone still using naphtha/lighter fluid, I recommend switching. It's a bigger expense up front, but they will last you a long time, and you will notice the cleaner/shinier parts.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I buy the Elma cleaners as Cousins sell them in 2.5L containers (£29.45+VAT). The L&R are only sold in bigger 3.8L containers(about £47+VAT). I use about half a jam jar of fluid and change after 5 watches. It's lasted me years and is similar in price to buying naphtha, but it cleans much better. So for anyone still using naphtha/lighter fluid, I recommend switching. It's a bigger expense up front, but they will last you a long time, and you will notice the cleaner/shinier parts.

Absolutely true Mike, buying the tins of lighter fuel isn't economic.   There is some other purer naptha available in bigger tins but it's much more expensive. I'm very curious to see how well gasoline cleans, residue etc. 

Just now, Neverenoughwatches said:

Absolutely true Mike, buying the tins of lighter fuel isn't economic.   There is some other purer naptha available in bigger tins but it's much more expensive. I'm very curious to see how well gasoline cleans, residue etc. 

Naptha is often quoted as a raw ingredient of petrol and other fuels It's the other added bits and bobs that help to make the fuel burn that dont get mentioned. As ex Aerospace you might know ?

14 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Absolutely true Mike, buying the tins of lighter fuel isn't economic.   There is some other purer naptha available in bigger tins but it's much more expensive. I'm very curious to see how well gasoline cleans, residue etc. 

Naptha is often quoted as a raw ingredient of petrol and other fuels It's the other added bits and bobs that help to make the fuel burn that dont get mentioned. As ex Aerospace you might know ?

Lol there's a lot of chemicals in petrol, one of them is a rust inhibitor. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

there's a lot of chemicals in petrol

This is true, perhaps diesel would be a better option as it tends to have less additives:

"Diesel is composed of about 75% saturated hydrocarbons (primarily paraffins including n, iso, and cycloparaffins), and 25% aromatic hydrocarbons (including naphthalenes and alkylbenzenes). The average chemical formula for common diesel fuel is C12H23, ranging from approx. C10H20 to C15H28. Petrol consists of hydrocarbons with between 5 and 12 carbon atoms per molecule but then it is blended for various uses. Overall a typical petrol sample is predominantly a mixture of paraffins (alkanes), naphthenes (cycloalkanes), aromatics and olefins (alkenes). The ratios vary based on a variety of factors."

source

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Waggy said:

This is true, perhaps diesel would be a better option as it tends to have less additives:

"Diesel is composed of about 75% saturated hydrocarbons (primarily paraffins including n, iso, and cycloparaffins), and 25% aromatic hydrocarbons (including naphthalenes and alkylbenzenes). The average chemical formula for common diesel fuel is C12H23, ranging from approx. C10H20 to C15H28. Petrol consists of hydrocarbons with between 5 and 12 carbon atoms per molecule but then it is blended for various uses. Overall a typical petrol sample is predominantly a mixture of paraffins (alkanes), naphthenes (cycloalkanes), aromatics and olefins (alkenes). The ratios vary based on a variety of factors."

source

I tnought about diesel which i read has aliphatic hydrocarbons, but diesel has a greasy feel to it which must be problem with cleaning ability. 

44 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I used petrol on a clock, it cleaned really well, couldn't see any residue but didn't brighten the parts. 

👍i have read about petrol for clocks somewhere, probably an old book. Not bothered about brightening metal, i have elma ammoniated for that but we have to be careful not to over submerge in it. Repeated cleaning in ammoniated solution might have an undesirable effect. I like the idea of cleaning with petrol experiment, besides the fumes.

Posted

Just found this:

"Diesel leaves a residue. then you need to clean that residue with, wait for it, another solvent. kerosene is the better and safer cleaning solvent if you are going to be using something by the gallon and cheap. it is about the same thing as diesel as a 'fuel oil' but kerosene is a known and common industrial cleaning agent... no one uses diesel if kerosene is available"

As far as I am aware kerosene is the US name for parafin.
 

source

  • Like 1
Posted

Ronsonol lighter fluid was paid for by the company I worked for. When it comes to cleaning clocks I used Horrolene clock cleaner plus other methods depending on the type of movement. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 6/6/2024 at 11:10 AM, Waggy said:

Just found this:

"Diesel leaves a residue. then you need to clean that residue with, wait for it, another solvent. kerosene is the better and safer cleaning solvent if you are going to be using something by the gallon and cheap. it is about the same thing as diesel as a 'fuel oil' but kerosene is a known and common industrial cleaning agent... no one uses diesel if kerosene is available"

As far as I am aware kerosene is the US name for parafin.
 

source

Last night's experiment coming up later today, i bought some Kerosene. Tested 6 fluids that are in common use for cleaning and a couple of interesting findings. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Here is an evapouration test of 5 solvent type fluids in common use for cleaning watch parts , and for a comparison a proprietary cleaner. The list in order of testing and result is as follows 1.  Lighter fluid  2.  IPA  3.  Methylated spirits  4.  Acetone  5.  Kerosene  6.  Elma ammoniated.  This maybe helpful in determining how good their cleaning ability is. The testing was kept fairly strict as far as a diy approach can be. A cupped mirror was used to place a single drop of fluid at it's center and timed until the drop completely evaporated or i ended the test, the mirror was throughly cleaned with IPA and dried between each test. Each picture is in order of the test starting with picture 3. My thoughts and notes are pic 3. The lighter fluid left quite a thick layered stain.  4. IPA was less stained.  5. Meths was very light on staining but left a thin outside ring and droplets at the center that would not evaporate ( possibly contamination in the meths ? ) 6. Acetone was by far the fastest evaporation rate leaving again light staining but a heavier outer ring stain.  Pic 7. Kerosene which was  interesting,  very low evaporation rate but a high wetting nature that climbed the whole of the mirror walls in 6 minutes, even with heat from a hairdryer the kerosene would not evaporate.  Pic 8. Elma ammoniated which did not evaporate or move at all for 8 minutes and pic 9. needed extra 5 minutes of heat to dry out completely . Pic 10. Is the mess from the dry Elma fluid when i tried to clean the mirror. Make your own conclusions from these results. 

20240606_154538.jpg

20240606_154622.jpg

20240606_145518.jpg

20240606_145917.jpg

20240606_151124.jpg

20240606_151654.jpg

20240606_152337.jpg

20240606_153926.jpg

20240606_154428.jpg

20240606_154458.jpg

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
×
×
  • Create New...