Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello there everyone 👋 I am new to the forum and in fact the hobby….

I’m not 100% of the name of this part, I am still rather new to this, but as I removed it I noticed it came off in two pieces and get the impression it’s not meant to…. I’d really appreciate any information possible so I can go on to try and source a part.

 

Using information found on another thread about Girard-Perregaux numbers I believe this movement to be: 33 09

 

Giarard-Perregaux

Sea Hawk

17 Jewel

3309453

 

A huge thank you for any information from such a great community

 

IMG_8810.jpeg

IMG_8811.jpeg

IMG_8812.jpeg

IMG_8813.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, nevenbekriev said:

Hi Samuel,

There should be no problem to use the part as is, no mater it is broken to 2 pieces.

Oh really? How interesting, given that it’s a clean break and it’s screwed down on both sides? 
 

Thanks fantastic!! That you ever so much my friend, I’m excited about the project again now as it’s driving me crazy trying to find one!

 

Thanks again 🙏🏻 

Posted
1 minute ago, clockboy said:

A replacement part is required. Try eBay for a donor movement b

With that I think it’s best I do try eh! I’ve sent a few emails/messages out and I think I’ve identified it as an A Schild 1688 and perhaps it’s a “minute train bridge”

 

Thabj you mate

Posted
Just now, mikepilk said:

It will be much easier (and cheaper) to find an AS 1688 movement for parts

image.png.b3e48bf987d296575ade5de0ffc408b4.png

It’s looking that way to be honest Mike, thank you ever so much for that info photo, that’s a great help

Posted
1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

It will be much easier (and cheaper) to find an AS 1688 movement for parts

normal that would be true but there appears to be a problem here. When I went looking for the cross reference parts list of the 1688 it referred me to another caliber which seemed suspicious? A little more research indicated what the problem is. Let me quote something for the first link. notice for both the 6887 and the 1688 that it's the base caliber and the part about unknown whether the base caliber actually exist at all?

image.thumb.png.96c5bbf157369537ff24a6f7cf324319.png

https://ranfft.org/caliber/777-AS-1688

https://ranfft.org/caliber/5946-Girard-Perregaux-3009

notice what happens when you go looking for the parts yes the first link has a few of them but basically refers you to another watch in the second one only refers you to have a watch which is the last link.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=AS_1687

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=AS_1688

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=ZOD_61_OLD

 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

normal that would be true but there appears to be a problem here. When I went looking for the cross reference parts list of the 1688 it referred me to another caliber which seemed suspicious? A little more research indicated what the problem is. Let me quote something for the first link. notice for both the 6887 and the 1688 that it's the base caliber and the part about unknown whether the base caliber actually exist at all?

image.thumb.png.96c5bbf157369537ff24a6f7cf324319.png

https://ranfft.org/caliber/777-AS-1688

https://ranfft.org/caliber/5946-Girard-Perregaux-3009

notice what happens when you go looking for the parts yes the first link has a few of them but basically refers you to another watch in the second one only refers you to have a watch which is the last link.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=AS_1687

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=AS_1688

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=ZOD_61_OLD

 

Wow this is fascinating and I’m loving it! I can’t believe the lengths you went to for my questions, I really appreciate you mate!

So perhaps the good news is I actually have a few potential donor movements or watch’s to look into instead of focusing on the single one (1688) 

Ive actually tried using epoxy to re-connect the the two pieces which is currently setting and waiting to be filed smooth whilst I try and find parts for a ghost movement 😆 

Huge thanks John 🫡 

Posted
14 minutes ago, rjenkinsgb said:

Some parts listing cross reference to a Zodiac 68 (and others); from photos that part is apparently the "minute train bridge".

Cousins have them in stock!

https://www.cousinsuk.com/sku/details/zodiac-movement-parts/zod70462

Cross referencing again, this is a Zodiac 70 462 on ebay (at twice the price) & the photo appears to match your part:

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/234176330083

 

 

BOUGHT! SOLD! PURCHASED! Un-real, with everyone’s help and information not only did I get a chance to see how powerful a forum could be but I’ve learnt ALOT about movements share/swap uses/information which has resulted in finding and buying the part!

Thank you very much mate

  • Like 2
Posted

Thank you everyone, I have located and bought a part, I appreciate all the replies and have really enjoyed the process…… I’ll let you know which parts I break during re-assembly and we can do it all again 😂😂😂

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...