Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Morning Everyone,

Purchased a C&E Marshall Staking Set yesterday for $200.00 AUD but involved a 400 km plus drive to pick it up from the retired watchmakers wife.

To my surprise there was a K&D balance staff remover in the box but no special stake for it.

Okay I have a few questions on a few things that are in the set:

1) There is a Stump in there pictured below, a No 16 which is listed "Pallet Fork" in the C&E catalogue how is that used ??

2) A small chrome tube pictured below which is definitely part of the set, pictured top R/H corner in the Set, its use ??

3) With the balance staff remover missing its special stake, should I just fabricate one if I ever use it?  I know that there is differing options on this site on staff removal whether to punch or cut.

Regards

CJ

Image.jpeg

IMG_0204.jpeg

IMG_0202.jpeg

IMG_0203.jpeg

Posted

I think the pallet fork stump is used for punching out the staff of a pallet fork. The slot is to prevent putting pressure on the guard pin.

The tube is used to pick up the stakes from the holder. Especially useful if you have fat fingers. My set is missing this, so I have a short silicone tube to do the same job. 

I have 2 balance staff removers and one of them has the tip of the punch broken off. If you have a lathe, it shouldn't be too difficult to make a new punch.

  • Like 1
Posted

Okay thanks Hector,

I would of never though of the tube as a stake holder/picker, great idea as I have been struggling to pick out the stakes and I have skinny fingers.

Regards

CJ

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...