Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi All

Now that I have a staking set, I want to purchase some smoothing broaches specifically for barrel arbour holes in plates and mainspring barrels.

I mainly work on Seiko movement and the average measurements are around 1mm plate hole to 2mm barrel hole.

And are all broaches tapered ??

I was thinking of this set from Cousins?

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/0070-to-300mm-german1?code=B36688

Appreciate your advice and comments

Regards CJ

Edited by Curare
Posted
21 minutes ago, Curare said:

Hi All

Now that I have a staking set, I want to purchase some smoothing broaches specifically for barrel arbour holes in plates and mainspring barrels.

I mainly work on Seiko movement and the average measurements are around 1mm plate hole to 2mm barrel hole.

And are all broaches tapered ??

I was thinking of this set from Cousins?

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/0070-to-300mm-german1?code=B36688

Appreciate your advice and comments

Regards CJ

Yes all broaches are tapered, without the tapered length they would not broach evenly and the tapering does vary. Minimum to maximum broaching out sizes are quoted per broach.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, Curare said:

was thinking of this set from Cousins?

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/0070-to-300mm-german1?code=B36688

Appreciate your advice and comments

I have a very similar one (also Cousins, also German, but 0.6 to 2.0mm). I'm happy with it and I once did a decent job (I think! time will tell..) on a barrel bridge to reduce sideshake of the barrel.

Sure, if you are an extreme perfectionist, you could argue that holes get better=straighter by having smoothing broaches with the least possible taper. That means, to have many! 

But really, for Seikos you will be fine with that set from Cousins. 

PS: have fun! It can be quite a bit of back and forth until you get the right hole size. Take it slow and don't get frustrated. But when you do get it right, it's a great feeling. 

 

 

OH, a tip!! 

What I did to help me get the hole size right was to measure the barrel arbor (at the respective position for barrel or bridge) and then use a sharpie to draw a line on the smoothing broach where it had the correct width. That saved me a lot of time. 

Edited by Knebo
  • Like 4
Posted
4 hours ago, Knebo said:

I have a very similar one (also Cousins, also German, but 0.6 to 2.0mm). I'm happy with it and I once did a decent job (I think! time will tell..) on a barrel bridge to reduce sideshake of the barrel.

Sure, if you are an extreme perfectionist, you could argue that holes get better=straighter by having smoothing broaches with the least possible taper. That means, to have many! 

But really, for Seikos you will be fine with that set from Cousins. 

PS: have fun! It can be quite a bit of back and forth until you get the right hole size. Take it slow and don't get frustrated. But when you do get it right, it's a great feeling. 

 

 

OH, a tip!! 

What I did to help me get the hole size right was to measure the barrel arbor (at the respective position for barrel or bridge) and then use a sharpie to draw a line on the smoothing broach where it had the correct width. That saved me a lot of time. 

You can always broach from both sides to make the hole more even. The plate and brigde holes i broach for a tighter fit than the barrel and lid.  These are not part of the unwinding only the winding as the arbor is fixed by the click and only moves when winding up.  As long as they aren't so tight as to stress the winding mechanism, the important bit is to get the friction right in the barrel so as not to rob power right at the source.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

You can always broach from both sides

I tend to do the same, but I'm not very strict about it, given the very shallow taper of the broach from end-to-end and the 1 or 2 mm of hole you are broaching the height difference of the broach over that plate thickness is vanishingly small, I could do the trigonometry, but haven't had enough coffee ☕ yet this morning, therefore in reality I don't think it really matters if you do from one side or do 50:50..or...? I tend to do from one side, and if it needs more I try and remember to do the next bit from the other side, if I can't remember which side's turn it is I don't worry about it using the reasoning above.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Waggy said:

I tend to do the same, but I'm not very strict about it, given the very shallow taper of the broach from end-to-end and the 1 or 2 mm of hole you are broaching the height difference of the broach over that plate thickness is vanishingly small, I could do the trigonometry, but haven't had enough coffee ☕ yet this morning, therefore in reality I don't think it really matters if you do from one side or do 50:50..or...? I tend to do from one side, and if it needs more I try and remember to do the next bit from the other side, if I can't remember which side's turn it is I don't worry about it using the reasoning above.

The difference is likely insignificant, on a thicker material than a lid a bit more so. Theoretically you would end up with a peak in the center of the hole if you broached from both sides, which i suppose once that had worn away would leave a cylindrical hole. That possibly could be taken into account of when to stop widening the hole. In all circumstances the the finished fit is the narrowest part of the hole and will eventually wear to the widest part of the hole which is one reason why its not a lasting repair. Dont be tempted to polish up the opening as the soft brass can potentially be charged up from any compound used. Ideally a broach with as shallow taper and smoothest cut as possible to finish with.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
×
×
  • Create New...