Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I got a little 3D printed mainspring winder (8mm) I'm trying to wind the spring for a 10mm barrel. This a Zim2602. Am I breaking them because the winder is too small for the spring? Or is this a case of user bumbling?

Posted
6 hours ago, 8lackie said:

I got a little 3D printed mainspring winder (8mm) I'm trying to wind the spring for a 10mm barrel. This a Zim2602. Am I breaking them because the winder is too small for the spring? Or is this a case of user bumbling?

I think we need a bit more to go on 8lackie. But honestly you have probably already answered this. The second question answers the first question.  At pre school we learned to put different shaped blocks into holes of the same shape, round block into square hole  X square block into square hole _/   . At watchmaker's school, i suppose that practical exercise continues at a much much higher level , parts need to fit very precisely. And in watchmaking very precisely means working at measurements in low numbers of microns . My point is, a mainspring meant for a 10mm barrel may not fit in an 8mm mainspring winder and if it did fit its unlikely that it wil be happy about it ( or otherwise feels very happy and secure and does not want to leave without a fight ) Please rate if you found this information helpful or otherwise sarcastic 😅.  

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

if it did fit its unlikely that it wil be happy about it

The interesting things you learn when you go to lectures on watch repair. For instance I remember somebody commenting that basically there's a limited quantity of time does that mainsprings can be inserted in the barrels from mainspring winders. This would be assuming that you're actually using the correct size and you're not torturing the mainspring by trying to insert it into a smaller size than it's supposed to go. Occasionally when you can't have the right size winder you try to cram the spring and you will find that the spring will be extremely unhappy and you will be unhappy with the results because you can really distort the mainspring even if you do get up to go in.

So yes it really is important to have the right size mainspring winder that suggest going to fit in and not torture the mainspring.

9 hours ago, 8lackie said:

Zim2602

Always nice to have a picture because there must be literally hundreds of thousands of different watches out there and it's really hard to memorize every single one of them so it's nice to see what you're dealing with.

https://17jewels.info/movements/z/zim/zim-2602/

9 hours ago, 8lackie said:

This a Zim2602. Am I breaking them because the winder is too small for the spring?

The interesting problem with sizing of things is. Things do not shrink in a linear fashion so as you get smaller tolerances become much much more critical. So as you found out yes trying to put something physically larger than the size is going to be a problem.

Posted

@8lackie, we need to know the particular place the spring breaks - the internal end for example, and when exactly it breaks - when winding in the winder barrel, when transferring to the watch barrel... The problem in using too small winder barrel is that when transferred, the spring unwinds rapidly to the bigger barrel size and the shock it takes is really big.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Both broke at the arbor ends. the spring that looks particularly torqued is one I tried to wind by hand....more than once.

Both of these 2602's are cleaned and disassembled. I'm hoping to make one running movement.

DSCF3488.JPG

DSCF3495.JPG

7 hours ago, nevenbekriev said:

@8lackie, we need to know the particular place the spring breaks - the internal end for example, and when exactly it breaks - when winding in the winder barrel, when transferring to the watch barrel... The problem in using too small winder barrel is that when transferred, the spring unwinds rapidly to the bigger barrel size and the shock it takes is really big.

Color me learned. I wasn't aware of 'them' physics. I'll continue my efforts.

Edited by 8lackie
Posted
20 minutes ago, 8lackie said:

Both broke at the arbor ends. the spring that looks particularly torqued is one I tried to wind by hand....more thank once.

Both of these 2602's are cleaned and dis-assymbled. I'm hoping to make one running movement.

DSCF3488.JPG

DSCF3495.JPG

Color me learned. I wasn't aware of 'them' physics. I'll continue my efforts.

Always learning and new knowledge to pick up 8lackie and the list of tools to make the work easier is an endless one. Stick with it , you will aquire more of both over time, no rush.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did you try it on a Rolex ref. 16600 specifically? Congrats on the nice condition of the movement in your watch. Even so, remember to check the rotor play or those marks around the main plate may start to build up.
    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
×
×
  • Create New...