Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

Trying to identify the cause for the chronograph hour hand misalignment for my Longines L687 movement.

Essentially, the hour hand will reset perfectly to 12 when reset button is pushed; however, after a couple days, the hour hand will be slightly misaligned (as shown in the picture). It doesn't appear to be gradually shifting over time but rather shifts very suddenly and doesn't get worsen beyond that point. So I am not sure if this is the hour hand creeping issue or something else.

Tried to demagnetize it but doesn't seem to help.

 

Any input is appreciated, thank you!

IMG01.png

Posted

My first guess would be a friction spring, something that helps hold it in place when not being driven?

If I'm understanding the diagram for that movement correctly, the lower centre hand is on item 52 in the drawing, "Hour counting wheel " - and that appears to be an assembly with a spring friction clutch included, between the driving wheel and hand / reset cam?

It's shown in the calendar works assembly drawing, page 22.

 

Or is the "reset" actuator supposed to remain solidly against the cams, and there is some slight loss of pressure on that somewhere, an eccentric screw or pin that needs adjusting? I've never worked on one of that style so I'm not 100% on the chrono disengagement or reset.

 

I'm looking at the ETA 7751 technical manual, linked via this page:

https://shopb2b.eta.ch/en/mecaline.html?p=3

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

The hour counter wheel does have a clutch, which slips whenever the chrono is stopped. In the image the blue arrow is the hour counter wheel, the green is the hammer for resetting to zero, and the orange is the brake. The hammer is pivoted on an eccentric that goes through the watch and is moved by the cam; the cam movement causes the brake to be pulled away or come in contact with the hour counter wheel.

 

When the chrono is stopped, the brake is in contact. When you press the lever to zero, the hammer comes down and pivots the brake away while zeroing, then when the hammer comes back up the brake comes in contact with the counter again.

 

The spring that holds the hammer back is what is actually applying pressure to the counter wheel through the brake. If that is disengaged then the counter will run- but it will run all the time.

 

In this case it could be that the clutch wasn't lubricated and is too grippy to slip when the chono is off. The brake surface that touches the wheel is toothed, but it could still slip. On older 775X movements, the brake was smooth, and slipping was a common enough problem that they went to the toothed version.

 

 

7750 dial side.jpg

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
Posted

Recently been working on a 7750 and the hour mechanism is the same. Essentially it is driven directly from the going barrel, but the driving wheel is friction mounted on the hour recording pinion, akin to a canon pinion. When the chrono is stopped, the little plastic part shaped like a boomerang stops the wheel moving, while the barrel continues driving the friction mounted driver wheel.

If it’s periodically jumping I’d guess that it’s a lubrication problem between the driving wheel and the pinion. If it sticks it will jump the little plastic teeth in the brake showing the slight shift you’ve got in the picture. 
 

Disclaimer - I’m pretty much a novice, and have quite possibly named these parts incorrectly and got things quite wrong. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...