Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi All ...

A further update....

It lives!!!!

I replaced the bottom hole jewel. However before I did that I tried to push the original back into place just as an experiment to see how the balance performed.

I managed to move it slightly before it disintegrated and the balance started to swing ...not brilliantly...but was 'better'.

After replacing the Jewell with a 1.2 x 0.12 hole jewel I had to get the end shake just right. Replacing the jewel did lift the roller table off the bottom plate and after a few tweaks with the seitz tool I got the end shake right.....so a lesson learned there.

The balance now swings and the watch runs and has been running for the last 6 hrs with a loss of about a minute...so it's been repaired for £9....which I'm happy with and it now goes into my collection...😊😊

Before you ask I have got a timegrapher and will put the watch on test tomorrow....I'm not expecting anything good but considering this 80 year old watch was dead it now lives on to fight another day.

To answer some questions...

Yes the impulse jewel is chipped but I'm not at the level of replacing one of those yet!

I used the Ronda 588 balance staff on what appears to be a Beguelin 23 at a size of 18.5 lignes.

Thanks everyone for your help I'm very grateful to you all. I've learnt quite a bit and bouncing ideas about has given me the confidence to try things out.

My next watch is going to be a nice silver cased Cyma Tavannes 919 👍

 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 6/24/2024 at 6:54 PM, nevenbekriev said:

 It is still not clear why flipping the small plate with the cap jewel would lift the pivot. 

 One side of cap stone is flat   " flat "  ,  other side is not  true dome   " domed "   as domes in Kremlin are,   its just a bit domed plus the stones edge is tapered, this all lets it enter the oil sink of balance jewel.

 I am sure you know, pivots are suppose to protrude from the hole a bit, so pivot wouldn't jump out of the hole easy and in the event of a shock. 

Entry of tapered side into the oil sink, reduced the protrusion of the pivot which as a result lifted the balance , as you can see  it did in this case.

This is not a good practice in watch repair, because as I explained above, the said pivot protrusion is needed, to prevent the pivot jump out of the hole of the jewel in the event of a shock.

The problem with OP's watch is " the bottom balance jewel is pushed deep inside the mainplate, thus letting roller table rub and leaving OP  with  excess end shake.

 

Rgds

Joe

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 One side of cap stone is flat   " flat "  ,  other side is not  true dome   " domed "   as domes in Kremlin are,   its just a bit domed plus the stones edge is tapered, this all lets it enter the oil sink of balance jewel.

 I am sure you know, pivots are suppose to protrude from the hole a bit, so pivot wouldn't jump out of the hole easy and in the event of a shock. 

Entry of tapered side into the oil sink, reduced the protrusion of the pivot which as a result lifted the balance , as you can see  it did in this case.

This is not a good practice in watch repair, because as I explained above, the said pivot protrusion is needed, to prevent the pivot jump out of the hole of the jewel in the event of a shock.

The problem with OP's watch is " the bottom balance jewel is pushed deep inside the mainplate, thus letting roller table rub and leaving OP  with  excess end shake.

 

Rgds

Joe

Hi Joe,

Well, we all know that usually one side of cap stone is domed.  No mater of that, flipping the whole plate with the cap stone in it, without shifting the stone, normally doesn't lift the balance. This is because the plate is normallhy thicker or at least of the same thickness as the stone itself. The flat side of the stone is flush with the plate surface, thus the domed side of the stone should not pop above the other side surface of the plate. This means that flipping of the plate should not lift the balance.

The hole stone MUST stay flat (or domed) side to the cap stone. If flipped, this may cause the pivot not to reach to the cap stone at all. This depends on the stone thickness and the ivot lenght thow

Posted
Just now, nevenbekriev said:

Hi Joe,

Well, we all know that usually one side of cap stone is domed.  No mater of that, flipping the whole plate with the cap stone in it, without shifting the stone, normally doesn't lift the balance. This is because the plate is normallhy thicker or at least of the same thickness as the stone itself. The flat side of the stone is flush with the plate surface, thus the domed side of the stone should not pop above the other side surface of the plate. This means that flipping of the plate should not lift the balance.

The hole stone MUST stay flat (or domed) side to the cap stone. If flipped, this may cause the pivot not to reach to the cap stone at all. This depends on the stone thickness and the ivot lenght thow

Hi nev, 

 Balance bottom jewel having been pushed down in the mainplate,  weakens my stance and further supports your point, leaving me not much ground to argue with you.

Surely you agree that  flipping cap stone ( at the least )  is a   cost free    test to produce more data  , before deciding to make a balance staff, which is an advanced task.

Us human beings tend to go the route we are familiar with, sure making a balance staff would have solved the problem, which unlike many here, your good at. 

 Frankly, I am beginning to think, you will make a balance staff to cure headaches with, what's more confusing is; you get good results too.  😍

Rgds

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England . No idea about Citizen but someone will advise soon.
    • Hi Chris and welcome to the forum, The hands and knees is by way of the rite of passage, we have all done that at some time or another.   Added a bit of citizen gen plus the T Z glossary Citizen Technical Information.pdf TZIllustratedGlossary.pdf
    • By the way, I opened my watch, looked under a magnifying glass, there is simply no grease, the screws are without traces, the slots are intact.I think it's just a matter of maintenance.there are no rotor marks on the body. And to remove the strap from yours, just press on the 1st side,and slightly move the strap, then on the other side and it will come off.
    • Hi My name is Chris. Just started trying to learn about watch and clock repair as a result of repairing my fathers old 1890s police station clock (about a year ago). The clock was Ok, but having graduated to pocket watches and then wrist watches, despite the really excellent stuff on Youtube, I am struggling a bit.  As a retired engineer, I find the engineering exquisite, but a bit on the fiddly side.  I have done a few practice watches with a little success but failed a few, but have had success with Seiko 7005s, 7009s etc, but have just attempted a citizen 5430.  Nightmare.  My wife thought I had found religion as I spent so much time on my knees with my eyes to the floor looking for springs.  Got through that and found that the balance is shot.  Trying to source one or something that will fit from the citizen range has me totally perplexed.  Tried Ebay, Cousins etc without luck.  Any advice as to alternatives that will fit or alternative sources would be gratefully received.
    • Agreed, this is puzzling. Can you ask questions or inspect the lots before bidding? My Boley & Leinen Reform face plate is dia. 95mm exactly. It's possible that 4 inches is a slightly too large approximation, but why then make the distinction to 3 11/16 for the sake of 8mm? If the larger ones are truly 4" then they will clash with the bed, but then I have no idea which 8mm lathe would take them. All 8mm lathes have spindle height 50mm or less, as far as I know. The spindle height is, as you say, standard 50mm for W.W.
×
×
  • Create New...