Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi All ...

A further update....

It lives!!!!

I replaced the bottom hole jewel. However before I did that I tried to push the original back into place just as an experiment to see how the balance performed.

I managed to move it slightly before it disintegrated and the balance started to swing ...not brilliantly...but was 'better'.

After replacing the Jewell with a 1.2 x 0.12 hole jewel I had to get the end shake just right. Replacing the jewel did lift the roller table off the bottom plate and after a few tweaks with the seitz tool I got the end shake right.....so a lesson learned there.

The balance now swings and the watch runs and has been running for the last 6 hrs with a loss of about a minute...so it's been repaired for £9....which I'm happy with and it now goes into my collection...😊😊

Before you ask I have got a timegrapher and will put the watch on test tomorrow....I'm not expecting anything good but considering this 80 year old watch was dead it now lives on to fight another day.

To answer some questions...

Yes the impulse jewel is chipped but I'm not at the level of replacing one of those yet!

I used the Ronda 588 balance staff on what appears to be a Beguelin 23 at a size of 18.5 lignes.

Thanks everyone for your help I'm very grateful to you all. I've learnt quite a bit and bouncing ideas about has given me the confidence to try things out.

My next watch is going to be a nice silver cased Cyma Tavannes 919 👍

 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 6/24/2024 at 6:54 PM, nevenbekriev said:

 It is still not clear why flipping the small plate with the cap jewel would lift the pivot. 

 One side of cap stone is flat   " flat "  ,  other side is not  true dome   " domed "   as domes in Kremlin are,   its just a bit domed plus the stones edge is tapered, this all lets it enter the oil sink of balance jewel.

 I am sure you know, pivots are suppose to protrude from the hole a bit, so pivot wouldn't jump out of the hole easy and in the event of a shock. 

Entry of tapered side into the oil sink, reduced the protrusion of the pivot which as a result lifted the balance , as you can see  it did in this case.

This is not a good practice in watch repair, because as I explained above, the said pivot protrusion is needed, to prevent the pivot jump out of the hole of the jewel in the event of a shock.

The problem with OP's watch is " the bottom balance jewel is pushed deep inside the mainplate, thus letting roller table rub and leaving OP  with  excess end shake.

 

Rgds

Joe

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 One side of cap stone is flat   " flat "  ,  other side is not  true dome   " domed "   as domes in Kremlin are,   its just a bit domed plus the stones edge is tapered, this all lets it enter the oil sink of balance jewel.

 I am sure you know, pivots are suppose to protrude from the hole a bit, so pivot wouldn't jump out of the hole easy and in the event of a shock. 

Entry of tapered side into the oil sink, reduced the protrusion of the pivot which as a result lifted the balance , as you can see  it did in this case.

This is not a good practice in watch repair, because as I explained above, the said pivot protrusion is needed, to prevent the pivot jump out of the hole of the jewel in the event of a shock.

The problem with OP's watch is " the bottom balance jewel is pushed deep inside the mainplate, thus letting roller table rub and leaving OP  with  excess end shake.

 

Rgds

Joe

Hi Joe,

Well, we all know that usually one side of cap stone is domed.  No mater of that, flipping the whole plate with the cap stone in it, without shifting the stone, normally doesn't lift the balance. This is because the plate is normallhy thicker or at least of the same thickness as the stone itself. The flat side of the stone is flush with the plate surface, thus the domed side of the stone should not pop above the other side surface of the plate. This means that flipping of the plate should not lift the balance.

The hole stone MUST stay flat (or domed) side to the cap stone. If flipped, this may cause the pivot not to reach to the cap stone at all. This depends on the stone thickness and the ivot lenght thow

Posted
Just now, nevenbekriev said:

Hi Joe,

Well, we all know that usually one side of cap stone is domed.  No mater of that, flipping the whole plate with the cap stone in it, without shifting the stone, normally doesn't lift the balance. This is because the plate is normallhy thicker or at least of the same thickness as the stone itself. The flat side of the stone is flush with the plate surface, thus the domed side of the stone should not pop above the other side surface of the plate. This means that flipping of the plate should not lift the balance.

The hole stone MUST stay flat (or domed) side to the cap stone. If flipped, this may cause the pivot not to reach to the cap stone at all. This depends on the stone thickness and the ivot lenght thow

Hi nev, 

 Balance bottom jewel having been pushed down in the mainplate,  weakens my stance and further supports your point, leaving me not much ground to argue with you.

Surely you agree that  flipping cap stone ( at the least )  is a   cost free    test to produce more data  , before deciding to make a balance staff, which is an advanced task.

Us human beings tend to go the route we are familiar with, sure making a balance staff would have solved the problem, which unlike many here, your good at. 

 Frankly, I am beginning to think, you will make a balance staff to cure headaches with, what's more confusing is; you get good results too.  😍

Rgds

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been playing with a NH35 movement that which has the classic Etachron regulation system and a few balance assemblies as practice. What I’m trying to do is get comfortable with the effect both the stud and regulator pin positions have on rate and positional error. When I install a new balance assembly I install it with the assembly in place  on the cock and cock is attached to base plate. I use the back of the tweezers to push the stud into place and feel the click. However, I noticed that the angle of the stud can be adjusted and what I also noticed is that some movements have the stud carrier arm bent down a little and that changes the angle of the hairspring leaving the stud. This angle effects how the spring goes through the regulator pins and also the spacing of the coils opposite the stud. What I thought I was supposed to do is set the regulator block in the middle of the curve, open the pins, and use the stud angle to center the spring.  Then the stud is set.  Now on all the new NH movements I have seen the angle of the regulator block is about 60 degrees counter clockwise from full open. I watched a video where the author used the regulator pin adjust to adjust rate and position error. When I close down the pins I do notice that the rate increases but also the amplitude drops, the coil spacing changes and hairspring appears slight straighter between the stud and the regulator block. If I open the pins the amplitude comes back, the spring breathes a bit more between the stud and the regulator block and the rate slows.  So, a long post I know but I would really appreciate any advice on how to correctly adjust the etachron system for rate, amplitude and positional error.   
    • Aw come on Andy, it was just a comparison between spending 30 quid and tackling a tricky piece of work. You appeared to be volunteering,  i volunteer for stuff all the time it gets me into all kinds of trouble.
    • It's not really shown here , but the blade flips over, so it faces the other way. The knob and threaded case holder then pushes the caseback seam into the blade. Once the blade starts to penetrate into it, the lever and blade are lifted , which should hopefully pop the back off. A lot of fashion style cases have very tight seams and need a sharp blade to start separating them.  Don't buy the cheaper plastic versions of this tool, the posts with the pins through for blade holder break easily if the apply extra force to blade. 
    • You will still be looking for a balance complete I’m afraid, this is the balance staff, balance wheel and hairspring in one package. Hairspring and the balance wheel are matched in the factory. Whilst we can change a balance staff the hairspring and balance wheel stay together.   Tom
    • The hairspring end has come adrift from the small terminal barrel.  I have tried to remove the taper pin to relocate it, but the task is beyond my skill set, eyes, hands and being in my 70s, probably beyond my life expectancy.  It is not too badly mangled on the end.  On the ebay offer, that really is a bit on the rich side.  I'll keep looking, maybe a good hairspring will turn up with a shot balance staff. As for time spent on knees.  I made up one of these from 3M magnetic tape and a piece of wood.  It works well for magnetic parts. Other things I have suffered with.  I found lubricants so very expensive that I bought some very small syringes and tiny needles.  I just decant a drop into my oiling pots when I start a movement and the remainder keeps really well in the syringes. Finally identifying the correct screw for the part led me to make up the board in the final pic.   Thanks for the info. Kind regards   Chris  
×
×
  • Create New...