Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Found this video on YouTube. This is how a professional poises a balance wheel to a very high degree of accuracy. Most large variations when regulating a watch in different positions is normally caused by the hairspring or the poise of the balance wheel.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, clockboy said:

This is how a professional poises a balance wheel to a very high degree of accuracy

Please replace "a professional" by "this person". 

What he doesn't know or doesn't tell: often you can find a slight out-of-poise on the poising tool that is intentional. Why? Because you do not take into account the influence of the hairspring then. 

His luck is that he has a balance with Breguet hairspring, that is poised itself. Else his method would work more poorly.

My poising tool stays in the drawer and is used for coarse adjustments only -  I use dynamic poising. No more dangerous removing and mounting of the hairspring. Additional I use PCTM instead of pen and paper: it tells automatically magnitude and  exact location of the heavy point. And I do not have to remember all the rules of dynamic poising then.

Frank 

  • Like 3
Posted
3 hours ago, clockboy said:

Found this video on YouTube. This is how a professional poises a balance wheel to a very high degree of accuracy. Most large variations when regulating a watch in different positions is normally caused by the hairspring or the poise of the balance wheel.

 

As Frank states, static poising is to get it in the park, where as dynamic poising takes more factors into consideration by poising the balance as a whole while it is in its working environment . Its not actually that difficult to get your head around how to do it.

Posted

One more note, a hint from pro to "pro":

With such a dented pivot there are other tasks to do than poising. Maybe this pivot is the real reason of an astonishing high poise error of a Rolex.

poising-1.jpg.e6877c5edb8f01fcc3dc0ef95e0b8630.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, praezis said:

One more note, a hint from pro to "pro":

With such a dented pivot there are other tasks to do than poising. Maybe this pivot is the real reason of an astonishing high poise error of a Rolex.

poising-1.jpg.e6877c5edb8f01fcc3dc0ef95e0b8630.jpg

The amplitudes were different for each poise check . One low and one high, granted both equally either side of 220 ° . 57 ° below and 64° above.  I wonder if that was pure luck ?

  • Like 1
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
×
×
  • Create New...