Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I mentioned this in my intro post but I’m wondering how to open the case back for the new tag heuer aquaracer 300. 
 

it’s a 300M dive watch, so I assumed a screw down case back. The crown is screw down. But the case back doesn’t have any indents to attach a tool to rotate the crown. 
 

another website said there are screws under the bezel, but I took the bezel off and there’s no screws on the bezel side.

 

any help would be appreciated 
 

you can see the case back in the link below

https://www.tagheuer.com/us/en/timepieces/engraving-online-service/43-mm-calibre-5-automatic/WBP208B.BF0631.html

image.jpg

Posted

Try taking the strap off and see if there is a notch for a tool or knife in one of the strap recesses?

I've never seen one before but suspect it is a pry-off type, as it seems unlikely the text and logo would always be in perfect vertical alignment if it was a screw-on type?

 

  • Like 2
Posted

I’ve taken the bracelet and bezel off and there’s no obvious way to take the case back off. Seems unlikely that a press on could be 300m water resistant, but the alignment of the logo and the lack of notches for an opening tool make it seem unlikely to be a standard screw down. 
 

I saw some threads mentioning “bayonet” and “cam lock” case backs for other watches, but it’s difficult to figure out if this watch uses those systems without being able to open it. The link below and the attached image mention the “cam lock” 

 

https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/aquaracer-300m-diver-with-snap-back-case.5299302/


the link below mentions screws on the bezel side, but I removed the bezel and there are no screws under the bezel so that information appears to be false.

 

http://tagheuerenthusiast.blogspot.com/2021/10/instructions-removing-backplate-of-2021.html?m=1

 

its not a cheap watch and was a gift from my wife, so I’m hesitant to be too rough with it especially if I don’t quite know what I’m doing.

 

ill remove the bezel and bracelet and post some pictures later today. 

IMG_5343.jpeg

Posted

Is it possible that with the use of screwback case tool there is a special  socket that fits inside the internal facets. I'm not entirely sure why you are trying to remove the back, for whatever reason is it worth the risk of damaging the watch ?

Is it new ?

Posted
16 hours ago, LazyTimegrapher said:

another website said there are screws under the bezel, but I took the bezel off and there’s no screws on the bezel side.

In the original post, it seems there aren't any screws under the bezel.

Posted

I saw mention of the super glue and bolt method on various forums. I wondered if there’d be any problem with that given the watch is titanium. Will the glue or the acetone stain the metal? Titanium is supposed to be resistant to corrosion, but sometimes certain metals react with chemicals unexpectedly.

 

If it doesn’t stain or scratch the watch and can be completely removed with acetone, the bolt and glue method seems like a clever last resort approach.

 

However, I don’t think I’m ready to use that method on this watch. The watch is new, and it was a gift, and it wasn't cheap. Also, +10 spd really isn’t that big of a deal. I can just correct it once a week to keep it within a minute of the correct time. If I had a manual wind watch I’d have to wind it more often than every week, so I can think of it that way.

 

I think neverenoughwatches is right that this is the wrong watch to use to start learning how to repair watches. I think I’ll either buy the Unitas 6498 or a clone to do the watch fix course. I may also get a $200 invicata pro diver with the SW200 movement that I believe is also in the tag heuer aquaracer to start learning watch repair. It uses the “caliber 5” which I believe is just an SW200-1 or ETA 2824-2 with a tag decorated rotor.

 

How long would you all say it takes to develop basic competence working on mechanical watches? What level does one end up at after doing the first three watch fix courses?

 

I mentioned in my intro post that I was emboldened to try to regulate the tag watch by my success in swapping out a broken quartz movement on a friends 15 year old fashion watch a month or so ago. It had a Ronda 762 which was available new from Esslinger for $10. I didn’t have the right tools or any experience but I was able to remove the movement, swap the dial and hands, and reassemble the watch to fix it. It appears to work fine now. The only reason I attempted it though was because they were going to throw the watch out, so the risk was really just the $10 for the new movement. The risk on this aquaracer is much higher and probably above my risk threshold.

 

Also thanks very much for all your suggestions and help. I’ll post some more images of the watch shortly.

Posted
17 minutes ago, LazyTimegrapher said:

I saw mention of the super glue and bolt method on various forums. I wondered if there’d be any problem with that given the watch is titanium. Will the glue or the acetone stain the metal? Titanium is supposed to be resistant to corrosion, but sometimes certain metals react with chemicals unexpectedly.

 

If it doesn’t stain or scratch the watch and can be completely removed with acetone, the bolt and glue method seems like a clever last resort approach.

 

However, I don’t think I’m ready to use that method on this watch. The watch is new, and it was a gift, and it wasn't cheap. Also, +10 spd really isn’t that big of a deal. I can just correct it once a week to keep it within a minute of the correct time. If I had a manual wind watch I’d have to wind it more often than every week, so I can think of it that way.

 

I think neverenoughwatches is right that this is the wrong watch to use to start learning how to repair watches. I think I’ll either buy the Unitas 6498 or a clone to do the watch fix course. I may also get a $200 invicata pro diver with the SW200 movement that I believe is also in the tag heuer aquaracer to start learning watch repair. It uses the “caliber 5” which I believe is just an SW200-1 or ETA 2824-2 with a tag decorated rotor.

 

How long would you all say it takes to develop basic competence working on mechanical watches? What level does one end up at after doing the first three watch fix courses?

 

I mentioned in my intro post that I was emboldened to try to regulate the tag watch by my success in swapping out a broken quartz movement on a friends 15 year old fashion watch a month or so ago. It had a Ronda 762 which was available new from Esslinger for $10. I didn’t have the right tools or any experience but I was able to remove the movement, swap the dial and hands, and reassemble the watch to fix it. It appears to work fine now. The only reason I attempted it though was because they were going to throw the watch out, so the risk was really just the $10 for the new movement. The risk on this aquaracer is much higher and probably above my risk threshold.

 

Also thanks very much for all your suggestions and help. I’ll post some more images of the watch shortly.

I think you are making the right decision here, it is far too valuable and not worth the risk for improving its performance  by just a few seconds, which might not even be that easy to achieve and it could go very wrong. So just 2 things to add to convince you to leave it well alone 🙂 1. If the watch is brand new and you take the back off, you can definitely kiss your guarantee goodbye and 2. 10 seconds incorrect rate on a timegrapher ( we didn't discuss the amplitude,  wind or positional variations )  doesn't mean 10 seconds incorrect rate on your wrist and on your bedside table, it could very well be more accurate than that. 

Posted

Attached are images of the watch from various angles. I’m still interested in unraveling the mystery of how the case back is opened, although I probably won’t attempt it any time soon.

 

The little bent metal under the bezel is I believe part of the mechanism for the unidirectional winding bezel. Perhaps that can be pulled off somehow to reveal screws below, but it’s hard for me to imagine that removing that metal ring is the way to open the watch. That metal ring doesn’t look like it’s meant to be removed in a regular service.

 

the other images show that there are gaps between the case back and the case. I do suspect it needs to be rotated to come off, but I’m not adventurous enough to attempt trail an error on this watch.

IMG_5355.jpeg

IMG_5344.jpeg

IMG_5345.jpeg

IMG_5346.jpeg

IMG_5347.jpeg

IMG_5348.jpeg

IMG_5349.jpeg

IMG_5350.jpeg

IMG_5351.jpeg

IMG_5352.jpeg

IMG_5353.jpeg

IMG_5354.jpeg

Posted
2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I think you are making the right decision here, it is far too valuable and not worth the risk for improving its performance  by just a few seconds, which might not even be that easy to achieve and it could go very wrong. So just 2 things to add to convince you to leave it well alone 🙂 1. If the watch is brand new and you take the back off, you can definitely kiss your guarantee goodbye and 2. 10 seconds incorrect rate on a timegrapher ( we didn't discuss the amplitude,  wind or positional variations )  doesn't mean 10 seconds incorrect rate on your wrist and on your bedside table, it could very well be more accurate than that. 


You’ve persuaded me that it’s not worth risking it with this watch just yet. However, I am still curious how to open it.

 

regarding the daily rate, the +10spd is measured on my wrist. Every 24hours I wear it, it gains about 10 seconds, and it gains about 70 seconds in 7 days. So the +10spd is the average daily rate when I wear it 24hrs/day. 

 

on the time grapher the rates are all over the place.  Amplitude is around 290-300 in all positions.
Dial up it’s +10spd

3 down it’s +18spd

12 down it’s +5spd

6 down it’s +20spd

dial down its +13spd

9 down it’s +4spd

 

I guess this means my wearing habits are mostly dial up. Perhaps also including  equal amounts of 3 down and 12 down which cancel each other out.

 

Since everything is biased fast, I thought I could slow it down to have it get closer to 0spd on dial up with some slow and fast in the other positions.

Posted

As far as my watch repairing plans go, I think I’ll buy some cheaper watches and/or watch movements to practice on. Probably the recommended ETA 6498 for the course and an SW200-1 / Invicta diver for practicing on a watch similar to the aquaracer.

 

Given the daily rates for the aquaracer, I suspect it has a standard/base grade of the SW200-1. My long term plan is to buy a top grade SW200-1 movement from Switzerland with the better balance and hairspring and swap that movement into the aquaracer to improve the timekeeping. A movement swap for a nice mechanical probably isn't trivial though, so that’s probably a plan for down the road when the watch needs servicing or when I feel confident enough that I can do the job without destroying the watch.

 

however, if anyone has ideas for how this watch opens I’m interested to hear them.

Posted (edited)

There is visibly a circular plate spring where the bezel fits, that appears to just lift out once the bezel is off?

It looks like there are holes or recesses under that, which may contain the supposed screws???

 

Edited by rjenkinsgb
typo
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, LazyTimegrapher said:


You’ve persuaded me that it’s not worth risking it with this watch just yet. However, I am still curious how to open it.

 

regarding the daily rate, the +10spd is measured on my wrist. Every 24hours I wear it, it gains about 10 seconds, and it gains about 70 seconds in 7 days. So the +10spd is the average daily rate when I wear it 24hrs/day. 

 

on the time grapher the rates are all over the place.  Amplitude is around 290-300 in all positions.
Dial up it’s +10spd

3 down it’s +18spd

12 down it’s +5spd

6 down it’s +20spd

dial down its +13spd

9 down it’s +4spd

 

I guess this means my wearing habits are mostly dial up. Perhaps also including  equal amounts of 3 down and 12 down which cancel each other out.

 

Since everything is biased fast, I thought I could slow it down to have it get closer to 0spd on dial up with some slow and fast in the other positions.

Curiosity is how we learn from wanting to know things. If you want to get inside it at least wait until the warranty has expired. I expected the rates to be better , did you say a Sellita ? do we know what the specified are ?

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I'm not entirely sure why you are trying to remove the back

As repairers and enthusiasts, we always want to see the movement or we simply want to figure it out well in advance of the inevitable service that will happen sometime in the future! 😆

6 hours ago, LazyTimegrapher said:

It uses the “caliber 5” which I believe is just an SW200-1 or ETA 2824-2 with a tag decorated rotor.

We often forget that Sellita's (and ETA's) movements are made in different grades. In an Invicta we can count on their simplest grade, and in Caliber 5 their finest, so your numbers have me a bit puzzled, within spec though. Most important is that it gains or loses roughly the same number of seconds per day.

I always get a little concerned when I read comments that disdain and dismiss watches like Tag Heuer's Aquaracer with "the fact that it only has a simple movement from Sellita" when in fact it has a movement of fantastic quality.

6 hours ago, LazyTimegrapher said:

What level does one end up at after doing the first three watch fix courses?

Well, I felt like a Master Watchmaker and owner of the world! Seriously! Then after six months or so I slowly started to realize I had only scratched the surface. After another six months, I knew for sure I had only scratched the surface. Nevertheless, working on watches is a wonderful way to waste your time! 😉

Edited by VWatchie
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

We often forget that Sellita's (and ETA's) movements are made in different grades. In an Invicta we can count on their simplest grade, and in Caliber 5 their finest, so your numbers have me a bit puzzled, within spec though. Most important is that it gains or loses roughly the same number of seconds per day.

I always get a little concerned when I read comments that disdain and dismiss watches like Tag Heuer's Aquaracer with "the fact that it only has a simple movement from Sellita" when in fact it has a movement of fantastic quality.

I really like the Tag Heuer aquaracer, particularly the model that my wife got for me. It was a watch I had wanted for quite some time. I know that online and on some forums people like to trash the brand for whatever reason, but the adjustable bracelet and the general look and feel of the watch are just great. It’s very lightweight and very comfortable due to the design and the titanium material. I also think it looks great.
 

I also don’t understand why many look down on ETA and Sellita. They are movement manufacturers and make great or at least good movements. 
 

The only thing that surprised me is that Tag used the lowest grade of movement for such a nice watch. I would have expected a higher grade given the price and also the quality of the rest of the watch.
 

However, it hasn’t soured me on the watch at all. On the contrary, it’s given me the challenge of swapping in a top grade movement once I feel capable of such a task.  
 

I'm not sure  where I read it, but I do believe I read that they used the lowest grade. I could be wrong though, so if anyone finds better information on the movement, let me know. On their website all they say is that it’s a “caliber 5”, which provides hardly any information at all.
 

I also aspire eventually to create a custom sapphire case back to put on the watch, but that will be more challenging given that it will need to be custom manufactured somehow.

I don’t ever plan to sell or give up the watch, so resale value doesn’t matter to me. I just look forward to one day turning this watch into the finest version of itself, at least according to my own tastes.

 

Perhaps I’ll even add my own custom finishing or engraving to the movement to view through the see through case back.

 

Whether or not any of this is feasible is another question, but it seems like a fun goal to pursue during my lifetime. It’ll give me a fun reason to learn watchmaking  at the very least.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...