Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

As repairers and enthusiasts, we always want to see the movement or we simply want to figure it out well in advance of the inevitable service that will happen sometime in the future! 😆

Well, I felt like a Master Watchmaker and owner of the world! Seriously! Then after six months or so I slowly started to realize I had only scratched the surface. After another six months, I knew for sure I had only scratched the surface. Nevertheless, working on watches is a wonderful way to waste your time! 😉

That’s helpful to know. Watchmaking does seem like a bottomless abyss of knowledge. I’m not sure I agree that it’s a waste of time, but it’ certainly seems like a fun thing to learn how to do. As you see from my other post, I have a pretty ambitious vision for this watch.  Whether I’ll ever be capable of realizing it is another question. Either way, I don’t think it can’t hurt to try (very slowly and carefully that is).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it turns out that other article was in fact correct. See the attached images. When I removed the metal ring, I found six screws in the groove below them.

 

I suppose that concludes the mystery of how to open this watch.

 

I’ve decided (for now) to heed the advice of my wife and those of you here who say it’s a bad idea to open this brand new watch and mess with it given that I have no experience repairing watches.

 

I suppose the final question I have for you all is what process should I undertake to gain the skills required to have confidence to work on this aquaracer. The first thing I wanted to do with this watch was attempt to regulate it and slow it down a bit. However, I also have ambitions of swapping out what I suspect is a standard grade SW200-1 with a top grade version. I also think it’d be really cool to figure out how to give this watch a display case back.

 

What things should I make sure to do first before graduating and allowing myself to tinker with this aquaracer?

 

Thanks again for everyone’s help!

IMG_5358.jpeg

IMG_5363.jpeg

IMG_5364.jpeg

IMG_5365.jpeg

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The easiest way to tell what grade the movement is by inspecting it with special reference to the balance. Standard and elabore as a pair share the same balance which has different shaped spokes compared to the ones used in top and chronometer. It could be standard, elabore or top, unlikely to be chronometer grade as that is often marked on the dial. 
 

Tom

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, LazyTimegrapher said:

I’m not sure I agree that it’s a waste of time

I didn't mean that literally but you could of course not know that. I was thinking of Jerry Seinfeld who recently said: "The secret of life is to waste time in ways that you like".

12 hours ago, LazyTimegrapher said:

I'm not sure  where I read it, but I do believe I read that they used the lowest grade. I could be wrong though, so if anyone finds better information on the movement, let me know.

If true, it is shameful considering the price. I do not think it is true. On the contrary, I think they are using Sellita's premium grade but it would be interesting to have it confirmed or denied by a reliable source.

12 hours ago, LazyTimegrapher said:

I really like the Tag Heuer aquaracer

So do I 😍

Edited by VWatchie
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I probably will open the watch eventually and when I do I’ll post pictures of the movement. It should be possible to figure out what grade it is once I’m able to take a look at it.

 

Given the positional variation and the daily rates I’m seeing at full wind, it’s hard to believe it’s a top grade movement though. I’ve seen others talk about SW200-1 movements claiming very high accuracies that are often significantly better than COSC standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering that at a base level the difference between the top grade and chronometer grade is just one has gone through the chronometer certification process and the other hasn’t. So would be easily capable of chronometer like performance 

 

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, LazyTimegrapher said:

What things should I make sure to do first before graduating and allowing myself to tinker with this aquaracer?

 

Get a decent set of basic tools. Read books about watchmaking, watch videos, or better yet, take Mark's courses.

Ruin your first movement, service your second and repair your third. By that time, you should know enough to know what you don't know and what you're not comfortable doing. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, eccentric59 said:

Ruin your first movement, service your second and repair your third. By that time, you should know enough to know what you don't know and what you're not comfortable doing. 

Wise words of advice. That sounds like a reasonable plan. Thanks.

I do plan to take the watch fix courses. Probably at least the first three. I’m not really a chronograph person but level 4 does sound interesting whenever it’s ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did a little research online in forums and it looks like the Caliber 5 is a standard grade movement. 
 

see pictures in this thread 

https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/can-you-help-me-about-the-grade-of-tag-heuer-calibre-5-movement-grade.4911629/

And also on caliber corner

https://calibercorner.com/tag-heuer-caliber-5/

image.thumb.jpeg.4449bfaeca454c1b0c9264c130547f62.jpeg


None of the images appear to have a glucydur balance wheel. At least as shown in this thread 

 

https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/luxury-and-normal-watches-using-same-movement.1934121/page-8

image.jpeg.8c4edcb38bd158be81a255bb64bcfa70.jpeg

 

whenever I open my aquaracer I’ll post an image of the movement and balance wheel. However just given that it’s daily rate ranges from +4 to +20 in different positions (see my earlier post for all the different positional rates) it makes sense that it is a standard grade. 

it’ll be a fun project to eventually swap the movement with a top grade sw200

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LazyTimegrapher said:

I did a little research online in forums and it looks like the Caliber 5 is a standard grade movement. 

Interesting! It may be just as you say but I think we can be pretty sure that Tag Heuer doesn't just throw the movement in without first ensuring that everything is working properly. I expect their quality control to be rigorous. Anything else could lead to disaster as long as they wish to be able to charge as well as they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok. I did a brave thing and checked the apparatus from all sides. Turns out it is a watch tool, Gem pat no 435111, a bracelet cutter indeed. Thanks for all the guesses. I really don't see how it works and to be honest I don't really care. I like how it looks so I'll stick with it. 
    • Another option is to use boric acid and mix it with denatured alcohol. Prevents scale buildup as well
    • Jumping in here, you are upset about the way the whole industry works, I get that and I do agree to a point. I would not call it a scam though, if I have a service with parts you can only get from me then you either pay my price or don’t, it is literally as simple as that.   as has been pointed out the movement is pretty standard, 3rd party crowns will have a close match as will case tubes. Find the parts, buy the tools and fix it yourself or find an independent watchmaker who quotes you a price that is acceptable to you.   this forum is a respectful and supportive place to be if you want to be involved and learn about watchmaking, we even support the drive by folks who post a question, get an answer and are never seen again.    Tom
    • I think most of this boils down to what constitutes a 'scam' vs the old excuse for appalling ethics; 'it's just business'. According to the OED, a scam is a dishonest business practice. In my opinion, trying to create a situation in which someone has no option other than to pay for expensive work that is knowingly unnecessary is a knowingly dishonest business practice. I can't help but feel, having now interacted with a fair few 'watch people', that this kind of behaviour has been somewhat normalized and the irritation seems to come from having it pointed out by a dumb customer/layperson like me. There are no mental gymnastics capable of convincing me that a service and a small part that's relatively cheap and very easy to install should cost almost a thousand dollars. If that's what some people within the watch industry feel is reasonable, we'll have to agree to disagree.
    • Definitely some kind of guillotine, for cutting  pins OH ?  Might not be watch related but the new one looks similar and I've seen vintage ones that almost match up.  Obviously its completely useless so i think the OP should send it my way and i will dispose of it responsibly .
×
×
  • Create New...