Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is one I've had for a while, 1020 movement, bought with a setting fault - but it was running and setting fine after a service. Until the second hand fell off!

I initially thought I'd not fitted it properly so re-fitted it - and it fell off again within a few hours. I then realised after looking at parts on ebay that it should have a bush or sleeve and the one I had was missing that. Since then I've been hunting for parts, then getting around to re-doing it as it's probably the most valuable one I have and I'm still nervous with anything that has difficult-to-get or expensive parts.

It was also missing the hack, which originally I was not bothered about as the plastic part seemed rather dodgy, and the date ring print looked worn.

I got a date ring, hands and found there was an alternate metal hack so got that too.

The hack is perfect, hands great - but I'm not sure of the date ring? It fits the movement, but is thicker that the one that was in it and looked like it may scuff or jam on the back of the dial? I've left the original one in for now; that does have some clearance behind the dial but I'm not sure if it is enough, or if there should be a dial spacer that I do not have? See the photo.

I do suspect it has been got-at to some extent in the past, as the hands that were on it look slightly tarnished and the seconds hand is a slightly different length to the one in the new set.

There is a slight mark on the dial around the 9 o'clock index; I have no idea what that is but I don't like messing with dials in case I make things worse. 

Whether or not the date ring is correct, it looks nice and runs well, definitely a good smart wearable watch!

 

IMG_2895.thumb.jpg.4816260ac3cbdeb86069f73de36680bc.jpg

 

IMG_2896.thumb.jpg.238728d8bbb35bca4b6173c643f1fc0f.jpg

 

IMG_2894.thumb.jpg.509af21a1d782d129ae990a4c856b997.jpg

 

IMG_2893.thumb.jpg.76f5c411e1bb6f2fa3f46f95200beb88.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
52 minutes ago, rjenkinsgb said:

This is one I've had for a while, 1020 movement, bought with a setting fault - but it was running and setting fine after a service. Until the second hand fell off!

I initially thought I'd not fitted it properly so re-fitted it - and it fell off again within a few hours. I then realised after looking at parts on ebay that it should have a bush or sleeve and the one I had was missing that. Since then I've been hunting for parts, then getting around to re-doing it as it's probably the most valuable one I have and I'm still nervous with anything that has difficult-to-get or expensive parts.

It was also missing the hack, which originally I was not bothered about as the plastic part seemed rather dodgy, and the date ring print looked worn.

I got a date ring, hands and found there was an alternate metal hack so got that too.

The hack is perfect, hands great - but I'm not sure of the date ring? It fits the movement, but is thicker that the one that was in it and looked like it may scuff or jam on the back of the dial? I've left the original one in for now; that does have some clearance behind the dial but I'm not sure if it is enough, or if there should be a dial spacer that I do not have? See the photo.

I do suspect it has been got-at to some extent in the past, as the hands that were on it look slightly tarnished and the seconds hand is a slightly different length to the one in the new set.

There is a slight mark on the dial around the 9 o'clock index; I have no idea what that is but I don't like messing with dials in case I make things worse. 

Whether or not the date ring is correct, it looks nice and runs well, definitely a good smart wearable watch!

 

IMG_2895.thumb.jpg.4816260ac3cbdeb86069f73de36680bc.jpg

 

IMG_2896.thumb.jpg.238728d8bbb35bca4b6173c643f1fc0f.jpg

 

IMG_2894.thumb.jpg.509af21a1d782d129ae990a4c856b997.jpg

 

IMG_2893.thumb.jpg.76f5c411e1bb6f2fa3f46f95200beb88.jpg

Very nice well restored watch Rob, looks like the tube did brake off the original second hand.

Posted (edited)

Yours is a 1010 with Date only.

The left Date Disc is for a 1020 for a Day Disc in the centre.

Also looks like your Date Disc is none original due to staggered teeth.

Edited by AndyGSi
Posted
7 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

ours is a 1010 with Date only.

The left Date Disc is for a 1020 for a Day Disc in the centre.

Also looks like your Date Disc is none original due to staggered teeth.

OK; I was going partly from this detail in an Omega document - the date ring, 1580, is one of the parts not shown as different between the 1010 & 1020.

The train bridge in it is a 1020 one, also. All the date rings I can find listed specifically against the 1010 are plastic, and only used or "refurbished" ones seem to exist. I was hoping the metal one was an upgraded version, as with the hack.

I did think this had been messed with, the date ring being wrong just confirms it. It does work fit perfectly and work fine, other than the print being poor! It is a larger outer diameter than the Omega part, so I wonder if it should have a dial spacer & that's been removed?

PartsList.thumb.jpg.d8712b22cab0f874a16cddc1c671e480.jpg

Posted

Thanks for the extra info. The Omega docs seem a bit inconsistent with some parts!

I found a Swiss parts supplier with the used 1010-1580 at a far more reasonable price that the ebay ones; I just hope it's in decent condition when it arrives!

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is a method described in the watch repair book of Mark W. Wiles. Don‘t hammer, just tap very gently!
    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
×
×
  • Create New...