Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know this may be a stupid question but I've never seen anywhere where its been mentioned. I know some Seiko movements wont allow the stem to be removed unless in a certain position but does it matter on other movements, should the crown be in the winding position (push in) or pulled out in the hand setting position?

Posted

I usually remove them in the setting position, on the basis that if the length sets the crown tightly against the case when pushed in, it's easier to re-fit the stem with it further out.

That's both when taking it out the case & after working on the movement, before putting it back in the case.

It may possibly be due to me starting out with mostly ebay scrap ones that were badly worn, though!

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Zedster said:

I know this may be a stupid question but I've never seen anywhere where its been mentioned. I know some Seiko movements wont allow the stem to be removed unless in a certain position but does it matter on other movements, should the crown be in the winding position (push in) or pulled out in the hand setting position?

It can vary, look at this photo . Pulling the stem into setting mode the yoke spring gets tensioned and when the setting lever screw is loosened (traditionally in this example was called the pullout piece screw for obvious reasons ) to release the stem too much the yoke under pressure against the pullout can jump underneath it and not always re-position as it has lost interaction with the pullout piece's slider and the two parts can bind up and get stuck in misalignment causing maybe an unwanted  dial off situation to re- align things. It doesn't always happen but it can do, in winding mode there is less  pressure on the two mating sliding surfaces so the problem is far less likely to happen. Again it all depends on the keyless set up, but this one is a classic for it , if you are not careful, i make a mental note of how many turns to make on the pullout screw to just release the pullout from the stem also avoids you completely disengaging the screw . I now look forward to an onslaught of abuse for calling the setting lever the pullout piece, i think it suits better in this example of releasing a stem so there 😋 ppbbbbbbbtt.

Screenshot_20240619-090758_Google.jpg

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Added words for verbal damage limitation, i cant be arsed to argue with anyone today 🙂
  • Like 3
Posted

Thanks for the replys. The issue I'm having is I don't have the setting lever screw type but a push type that needs depressing from the other side and with the hands fitted, after adjustment for date and time, it's a real pig to do, you almost need an extra pair of hands as I can't lay the movement down.  The pin is really hard to depress and I ended up breaking the winding stem so had to purchase a new item.  However, I had a thought of how I can most probably do it and if it works I'll post a picture 👍

  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Zedster said:

Thanks for the replys. The issue I'm having is I don't have the setting lever screw type but a push type that needs depressing from the other side and with the hands fitted, after adjustment for date and time, it's a real pig to do, you almost need an extra pair of hands as I can't lay the movement down.  The pin is really hard to depress and I ended up breaking the winding stem so had to purchase a new item.  However, I had a thought of how I can most probably do it and if it works I'll post a picture 👍

We have discussed this a couple of times recently,  you need to be a right hand finger contortionist. It is possible to hold the dial in your left hand and press the button with a needle in your right hand while flicking out the crown with your right ring finger. Either that or a cup movement holder or a holder that just grips the edges of the dial not interfering with the hands.

  • Like 1
Posted

Some of these setting levers and variations of them are a push button release, the lever can have a tensioned bridge spring connecting either directly or indirectly over or to it. Kasper movements have them , the same situation of keyless binding up can occur with those as well.

11 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

A thimble with the pusher attached? 

I like it rich, you'll be a watchmaker yet 😉. Index finger shown can press the button and the thumb can flick out the crown.  I was gonna show you the middle finger but thats just rude considering you had a good idea 😄

17188032145574876456618195394353.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Thanks guys. I did originally think of laying the movement on a drawing pin and pressing the face down but I then thought of a better solution, that is if you have a 3D printer. There is another thread on here where a guy (Thank you) has designed a modular 3D movement holder so I thought just print out the insert and make the inner diameter the same size as the dial. I used some flexible TPA filament and it worked like a dream 👍 I can lay the movement face down and press the pin, with no problem 😀

Sorry I'm trying to upload some photos but for some reason now my photos are corrupt 🤬

 

 

IMG_1305.JPG

Edited by Zedster
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...