Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi there are many answers to this question like, What was the cleaning solution, ammonia type  or waterless type , state of the plating in the first place, cleaned by machines or by hand . Were the parts soaked in any solution. And the variables go on. It may be an awkward question to answer properly.

Posted

It was likely weak and old plating and the ultrasonic did it in. I try to avoid the ultrasonic with older movements and the when plate looks to be worn. Just this week I had to clean the main plate of a weems because it soaked in alum for a week. Nothing worked so it went into the ultrasonic. Cleaned but down to the brass in a few spots unfortunately…

Posted

What ultrasonic did you use? Those cheap chinese ones you see on ebay which do not specify that they are for cleaning watches damage watch movements. 

Posted

I suspect his was old, fissured plating and that the combination of your US cleaner and the solution you used did for it.  I’ve had the same thing happen with old plating using US and a particularly aggressive, locally made, cleaning solution.  With one old movement, the barrel came out of the cleaner with not one speck of the original plating attached.  The rest of the movement and all the other plates and bridges were entirely untouched.  So now, any particularly flaky looking old parts, I keep out of the US and  instead clean them by hand in non-polar solvents.  

  • Like 1
Posted

I have no idea what movement it is. I just started taking things apart and cleaning them. It was slightly flaking prior to US cleaning. I used the #111 and #3 for

5 min at 43 deg Celsius. I am just cleaning my first pocket watch.  It says admiral on the face and it is a keystone case. I did no presoaking.  Just Getting into the hobby.  Will the lack of plating degrade function or is it cosmetic only.

 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...