Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

looking on youtube for videos of servicing of more complex Seiko movements.  I basically only see the low grade movement used in most US imported Seiko (like the 7S26 and 4R36 and related movements).  I am interested in seeing things like the 4S27 which is in my SAGN011 watch or the 6R20 6R24 6R27 8Rxx chronographs and so on.  Basically anything else than the ones we always see.

Am I just not looking well enough or are they no such videos?

 

Posted

Interesting, those are exactly the reason I would be interested in them.

In the end what got me into this hobby is the intricacies of mechanical movements and the complexity of what can be achieved with these technology.

I hope I am not shocking anyone when I say that from a purely functional point of view, nowadays mechanical watches are pointless but I love the beauty of the mechanisms the fact that despite their diminutive sizes they can run so well for so long.

I work in software engineering (for 25 years) and I find the manual craftmanship which goes into maintaining those (I am not going to talk about building because I know that any modern watch I'd be willing/able to pay for will have been built mostly if not all by machines) fascinating, the more complex the more so.

 

I also have to say that on the other hand I find plenty of videos about servicing of vintage swiss watches including complicated ones and I find that it gives an impression that only swiss made complex mechanical watches and all the other are reduced to at most automatic, center seconds and date.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Terrinecold said:

I hope I am not shocking anyone when I say that from a purely functional point of view, nowadays mechanical watches are pointless

Interesting thought but it brings up the problem of why are watch companies still making mechanical watches? Unless the purchasers of mechanical watches disagree with your point of view?

54 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

rarity

I had to go and look up the watch I wasn't sure quite what it was. The problem with YouTube video is in order for them to make a video they have to have a watch to service. Then I'm a make a wild assumption that these are probably pricey watches and that would mean a lot a YouTube channels probably don't have the money to purchase something like this for the purpose of making a video. So you could help out one ear YouTube jails by purchasing one and see if they would service it make a video as I've seen a number of channels commenting somebody sent this watch to me for servicing.

https://reference.grail-watch.com/family/seiko-4s/

 

Posted

I think they are making them because they can sell them.

I don't think the purchaser (which I am one of) disagree.  I think they are considered to be mostly jewelry and appreciated for what they are (see the above on my fascination with their mechanism).

I don't think any maker of mechanical watch thinks that they do any of their function better than what can be done with a quartz watch in particular if solar.

Now note that I said "from a purely functional point of view".  The amount of products which are sold and which we (including me) buy which have a value for non "purely functional" reason is staggering.

But when I do buy a mechanical watch I don't do it because I think it will be better at giving me the time than the phone I carry with me all the time or any other thing.

When I buy clothes I don't just consider the functionality of them, I do consider what I will look like in them.

And so on and so forth.

About the 4S27 as mentioned a few time I do have one which I got 20 years ago as a present for my 30th birthday.  I had it serviced a couple times since then with a lot of difficulty because finding a watchmaker in Boston who would accept to do it (most who actually service watches which I contacted just sniffed and put their nose up when I said it was a Seiko).  I unfortunately broke something in the movements a few years back when I dropped the watch while picking it up from a locker after climbing.  I sent it to Seiko US who wouldn't touch it and sent it to Seiko Japan who repaired it (for almost the price I paid for it new but it has great sentimental value to me).  Right now one of the links is damaged and it will again be repaired by Seiko Japan when my wife goes there this summer.  I scoured the internet and couldn't find an original bracelet or link for sail without the whole watch.

I have to say I hope one day to be confident enough to open it up and service it myself but that day is definitely not now.

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Interesting thought but it brings up the problem of why are watch companies still making mechanical watches?

Because people like us watch enthusiasts find the movements fascinating. A simple movement, no complications, should be a relatively simple device, consisting of  relatively few components but as we all know it it's actually incredibly complicated.  You are far more experienced than me, so I don't have to mention tolerances, poise etc.

Some people aren't into watch repair but appreciate the quality of a mechanical movement, even if they had never seen a movement, nor undestand them. 

Finally, posers who want Rolex et al because they are vain. 

  • Like 1
Posted

And a picture of the watch itself image.thumb.jpg.ecad10d5e061bad676013123cd5c6679.jpg

Just now, RichardHarris123 said:

Because people like us watch enthusiasts find the movements fascinating. A simple movement, no complications, should be a relatively simple device, consisting of  relatively few components but as we all know it it's actually incredibly complicated.  You are far more experienced than me, so I don't have to mention tolerances, poise etc.

Some people aren't into watch repair but appreciate the quality of a mechanical movement, even if they had never seen a movement, nor undestand them. 

Finally, posers who want Rolex et al because they are vain. 

Yes exactly what I was trying to express.  I didn't want to offend anyone.  People including us are buying them that is why watch company make them.  We buy them because we like them but normally not because we think they keep better time than alternative.  we buy them because they are beautiful and fascinating.  

Posted

Back in the 70's and 80's we never had the internet or these videos you have now. We had to learn from scratch. You could write it down, learn from memory or find your own way of how to go about it. Service manuals were hard to get, you had to wait a long time to get some of them and not all were available. Customers wanted their watches repaired ASAP.  Cameras were no good for this type of work you had to get the film developed and that cost money. It is so easier these days to service complicated watches.   

  • Like 4
Posted

Not surprised I can say for sure that without internet and YouTube I would never have started this hobby or considered that it could be one

I would probably have been making model trains or airplanes

Posted

The main reason there is little information is that with the complexity of the watch and no or very little service information it has to go back to the factory for service/repair.  But unlike Swatch it’s not up front  it’s by the back door effect they would tell you there isn’t any technical information only factory documents which are not for general release. So either you attempt a service knowing there are no spares  or documents available and should you. Cock it up back to the factory I goes. 

Posted

I don't see why the knock on mechanical watches. All watches are technically non essential with the advent of cell phones. In some ways you could say there is less use for high end quartz watches as they are just Jewellry without the mechanical workings draw. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...