Jump to content

Benrus 3 Star Self-Winding. Can’t Open the Case - Again!


Recommended Posts

I recently posted about my inability to determine exactly how to open a vintage Sovereign watch.  As some of you may recall, with a lot of help from people in this group, I eventually figured out that the watch was a front loader and got everything worked out.  The watch is now running great and in my collection.  For my very next project I purchased a 1950s Benrus 3 Star 25 Jewel Self-Winding watch.  I wanted to expand my experience into automatics.  I figured since Sovereign was made by Benrus and both leaned heavily into front loading single piece case backs, I shouldn’t have a problem.  I was wrong.  Let me try to get to the point.  I have added pictures to help provide as much info as possible.  This watch appears to clearly have a seam in the case back.  There seems to be an opening on the rear of the front half of the case to allow the stem to slide out of the back of the case (possibly without being removed). The case DOES NOT say “Open Through Crystal” as many Benrus watches do.    The crystal is a “low dome” style and my crystal lift (not the highest quality )cannot seem to get a grip on the side of it as it is almost 100% angled with no real straight piece to grasp.  I read in an old discussion on this site (where someone was having a similar issue) that some Benrus watches open by pushing the crystal and movement through the case in a way that actually pushed the case back off.  I can find NO obvious place intended for prying the case back off but there definitely appears to be a seam.  See pics.  
Once again, I would greatly appreciate your input and advice.  Thanks.

IMG_3184.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMG_3194.jpeg

IMG_3196.jpeg

IMG_3203.jpeg

IMG_3202.jpeg

IMG_3199.jpeg

IMG_3200.jpeg

IMG_3205.jpeg

IMG_3204.jpeg

Edited by Latetothegame
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, that looks like a removable back.

The slot around the stem in the front case half appears to be for the movement to release through the back,  plus the rear text is not in perfect alignment with the case, which implies the back has been removed in the past.

I'd expect it to split at the "step" level, behind the stem & front case body, not at the bezel or crystal.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Benrus indeed has models with a kind of 2-piece case where you have to press on the crystal to remove the back after you remove the crown (split stem). Roamer had a simular system. Benrus sold specific tools for that purpose. I had one of those tools, but it was incomplete (just the box and the press) so I sold that to a Benrus collector.

You can still find these sets. Often the pictures also show the instructions for removing and assembly. There's on on the bay right now:

 

Screenshot_20240630_073307_eBay.jpg

Screenshot_20240630_073343_eBay.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Latetothegame said:

I recently posted about my inability to determine exactly how to open a vintage Sovereign watch.  As some of you may recall, with a lot of help from people in this group, I eventually figured out that the watch was a front loader and got everything worked out.  The watch is now running great and in my collection.  For my very next project I purchased a 1950s Benrus 3 Star 25 Jewel Self-Winding watch.  I wanted to expand my experience into automatics.  I figured since Sovereign was made by Benrus and both leaned heavily into front loading single piece case backs, I shouldn’t have a problem.  I was wrong.  Let me try to get to the point.  I have added pictures to help provide as much info as possible.  This watch appears to clearly have a seam in the case back.  There seems to be an opening on the rear of the front half of the case to allow the stem to slide out of the back of the case (possibly without being removed). The case DOES NOT say “Open Through Crystal” as many Benrus watches do.    The crystal is a “low dome” style and my crystal lift (not the highest quality )cannot seem to get a grip on the side of it as it is almost 100% angled with no real straight piece to grasp.  I read in an old discussion on this site (where someone was having a similar issue) that some Benrus watches open by pushing the crystal and movement through the case in a way that actually pushed the case back off.  I can find NO obvious place intended for prying the case back off but there definitely appears to be a seam.  See pics.  
Once again, I would greatly appreciate your input and advice.  Thanks.

IMG_3184.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMG_3194.jpeg

IMG_3196.jpeg

IMG_3203.jpeg

IMG_3202.jpeg

IMG_3199.jpeg

IMG_3200.jpeg

IMG_3205.jpeg

IMG_3204.jpeg

Patent numbers can sometimes give us clues to things like this .Screenshot_20240630-101919_Chrome.thumb.jpg.f8fb10232b8c001afdb4189fd4994a7a.jpg

Screenshot_20240630-101939_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240630-102028_Chrome.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

If it is a split stem, you could try the compressed air method. 

Well in this case 😉 compressed air will probably blow the crystal off, and you need that to push the back / centre piece of the case out. 

26 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Patent numbers can sometimes give us clues to things like this .Screenshot_20240630-101919_Chrome.thumb.jpg.f8fb10232b8c001afdb4189fd4994a7a.jpg

Screenshot_20240630-101939_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240630-102028_Chrome.jpg

Good digging!

Indeed the same principle as Roamer's. Different patent?

 

 

17197410621243749893183321621797.jpg

17197411085247233233546195086765.jpg

17197412278102107225071759358664.jpg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your input and information.  So, I know this isn’t the tool specifically intended for the job, but do you think I could get away with using this case press tool as shown in the attached pics?  I already have it and I don’t know if I want to invest in the Benrus tool since I don’t really anticipate working on a lot of these watches.  I’m thinking there’s a risk the lugs may not be able to withstand the pressure but they seem pretty solid.  Am I missing something else?  Thanks. 

IMG_3211.png

IMG_3212.jpeg

IMG_3214.jpeg

And I obviously would need to remove the stem first.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worth a try. Should work. I'm not a big fan of these presses though, as it is difficult to "manage" the amount of force. That's why I practically never use the Bergeon 5500  but prefer the screw down type press:

17197444470406175847219833982036.jpg

The Roamer sets come up for sale often, and are usually cheap. And as a watchmaker's purpose in life is to collect tools....

 

17197447014874620324883445699100.jpg

17197447111129082124181269307451.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with all watches to get the movement out employed different methods,  screw back,   Press on backs etc but we cannot assume they are all the same. I have had watches that to get the movement out entails first removing the back. Then the glass and bezel , then removing the case screws and lifting the movement through the front. When investigating  how it opens up be very careful and explore all avenues don’t just dive in with a case knife, I have come across some gouged up cases in the past.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bulova also had watches with this style case so they also sold their version of a press. These purpose-made tools are nice, but as you found out you can find other ways to push them apart and together. 

My advice is to be careful with the crystal on these - they have a unique side wall geometry (as shown on the patent diagram above) and are not that easy to replace. Some NOS crystals are out there, and there are some ways to bodge other crystals to work (you can search for some other threads here on WRT) but it's best to maintain what you have if it's not badly damaged. The "official" opening fixture has a wide clearance so the crystal isn't subjected to pressure when the case is popped apart, and the closing fixture very tightly conforms to the crystal so the pressure is evenly distributed during closing (see picture).

benpress.thumb.jpeg.5384333c7a37ff22557383b041b8600f.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Geotex.  I did press it back in with my press and it went in without any issue so I may have dodged a bullet there.  The crystal is not in great shape.  It has a lot of micro cracks around the edge.  I ordered a PHD 25 (28.5 mm) crystal.  It seemed to be a good match in terms of shape and the diameter was spot on.  
I do have a bit of experience reshaping them if it’s not quite right.  We’ll see how that plays out.  The dial and the case were both sort of a mess but they cleaned up nicely so I’m hoping that I can get a new crystal to fit (see pic).  Thanks again.  

IMG_3235.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suspected that might be the cause but I’m definitely still a newbie and it’s good to get some confirmation. I’ll have to look for a donor and see whether I can address it that way.  Appreciate the reply-
    • Hi Daniel, It is important to inform what way of turning the staff You have choosen. Is it on T-rest with hand held gravers or with cros-slide support? This are quite different approaches and we will give beter advices if we know what You are doing. As I understand, You have HSS gravers. Well, HSS this days is not what it was say 50 years before, as they don't put tunsten in it any more. So, in practice, modern HSS tools are good for nothing. Old ones will probably do. New HSS tools with cobalt perform beter and are close to performance of old HSS tools. One possible reason for pivot turning problems is the steel is soft. Soft steel will tend to bend and stick to the tip of the graver. The other possible reason is the steel is to hard for the graver. If You let the material to get burnished instead of cut clear, the surface gets even more hard and thus HSS graver tip will get dull and will burnish further instead of cutting. So, turning needs correct position of the graver and attack angles, this is especially magnified when cutter is HSS. So, my advice is to use carbide cutters. The hardening of the steel is another, different craft, that needs a lot of learning. Preparing of the steel for balance staffs (and all other parts) needs to be made avoiding risks of incorrect heat treatment. The main risk is to overheat the steel - this makes it brittle and useless. Of course, one must know what kind of steel is to be hardened and what are it's critical temperatures. But typically for tool steel with 1% carbon content, heating for the hardening must be about 750 degr. celsius and no more than 790. Heating above 800 degr. ruins the steel making it with big crystals in the structure and brittle.  So If You will heat treat the steel by Youself, make experiments with examples that You will break after hardening and bluing to ensure that the structure is uniform grey color with very small crystals. The easier way for beginner is to use rollers from roller bearings. They are (usually) made from good steel and need only blue tempering.  
    • Hi pap3r, sorry for not getting back to you sooner. I used steel rod, i made a hole in one end to fit over the shaft of the motor, i used 3 grub screws to lock it into place. I lathed down the other end to fit the elma basket frame lid, that is also held in place by a grub screw. I have used the machine alot since this modification and it has worked perfectly, as long as you don't use a water based cleaner you won't have any problems with rust. Hope this helps.
    • I need to see the movement. If there is enough 'meat' under the post to drill a hole and to press new seel post there, this is a piece of cake. Of course, one can do it on the late with face plate. If I have to do it this way, will center by the undamaged part of the post. I don't have scope and never have used one. My Optivisor (#7) glasses  is what I use and this is enough. placing the cutter tip close to the object (the post) and observind the distance between them while rotating the spindle helps to find the needed direction for moving the movement in the face plate. The easier way is to file the post with dremel and drill the hole by hand, the drill bit in pin wise. Centering  with center drill bit, which donesn't bend and moving the center when turning the wise and pressing in needed direction is possible. The circular traces from mashining the post in the plate are enough to find the center. Another way is to use depthing tool to find the correct distance between posts of the minute and intermediate wheels and the distance between intermediate and the wheel in the rocker when rocker is in setting position and to draw arches, the crossing point will be the center for the post. For sure the cannon pinion must be checked, such wear is not normal in this place. Is there a calendar on the movement? Setting the calendar and cannon seizing due lack of lubrication may explain this kind of wear.
    • I honestly read this as a cruel joke, use a large reamer to undo all the work you just did reducing the hole to refit the barrel arbor. Now I get it - reamer only on the very outer edge, but I have a deburring tool for that anyway. I can't believe they had an in-house astronomer and in-house observatory at the Elgin factory to determine the reference time from a known star.
×
×
  • Create New...