Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi gents,

So I got a cheap set of 2 hands removal thingies from Cousins. I think the tips are too thick compared to other brands. I suppose these couldn't lift, for example, a GMT hand.

What do you think?

WIN_20240706_18_43_22_Pro.jpg

WIN_20240706_18_42_37_Pro.jpg

WIN_20240706_18_42_47_Pro.jpg

Posted (edited)

If you look at the listing they're designed to be finished by the buyer.

image.thumb.png.acc949e41630f4fbd542e852a28b00b9.png

Edit

Before and after finishing. I've got another set that are slightly thinner too.

IMG_20240706_201548.jpg

IMG_20240706_201609.jpg

Edited by AndyGSi
  • Like 1
Posted

The first set I got were like that - a total waste of space.

I found some cheap ones on ebay that were far better, with very fine tips.

They are no use as they are so try grinding them!

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Hi gents, so I managed to grind the tips of the hands removal levers.

I borrowed some LEGO pieces from my kid and built a small cart to keep the angle when I'm honing the tips.

I honed enough, in my opinion, to be able to lift the hands. I didn't want to grind too much and get them too thin, I'm afraid the tips could bend or snap.

Below the "toy" I built and final result.

What do you think? 

What is the thickness of your tips, by the way?

IMG_20240707_150448.jpg

IMG_20240707_150439.jpg

IMG_20240707_150514.jpg

WIN_20240707_15_57_46_Pro.jpg

Edited by BFernandes
  • Like 2
Posted

Mine from the photo are 0.3mm at the tip going to 0.5mm over about the first 2mm.

The other set I've got at work are like a razor on the tip but I don't use them that much.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I struggled with the cheap ones. I changed the shape many times, but I never managed to get them as I wanted.

So I bought some Horotec ones. They are so much better to work with - polished to the perfect shape. They aren't cheap, but as you use them on every watch, I think they are one of the list of tools (screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holders etc) where it's worth spending extra.

 

image.thumb.png.264b1ca86faa2c6ef462e643e7c17260.png 

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

I struggled with the cheap ones. I changed the shape many times, but I never managed to get them as I wanted.

So I bought some Horotec ones. They are so much better to work with - polished to the perfect shape. They aren't cheap, but as you use them on every watch, I think they are one of the list of tools (screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holders etc) where it's worth spending extra.

 

 

I've got the Horotec set as well. I don't think I've touched the presto tool for hands since.

Posted

I think I'll grind the tips a bit more.

Considering that the GMT hand is really low at around 0.2mm, there's no way mine can take it out.

I'll keep the LEGO cart around and next week I'll hone some more to see if I can achieve a thinner wedge.

Posted
12 hours ago, mikepilk said:

So I bought some Horotec ones. They are so much better to work with - polished to the perfect shape.

I got them too and I'm very happy with them.

13 hours ago, BFernandes said:

Hi gents, so I managed to grind the tips of the hands removal levers.

I borrowed some LEGO pieces from my kid and built a small cart to keep the angle when I'm honing the tips.

That was very resourceful of you. Skilled watchmakers are good at improvising and finding solutions outside the box. I'm not very good at it, but I'm practising it and getting better and better. It's an important part of watchmaking.

Perhaps I had tried to polish the hand levers using a polishing machine, starting with a 1st stage Gialla mopping wheel and orange Dialux. Not sure how good of an idea that would be though but perhaps worth a try.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/7/2024 at 8:31 PM, oldhippy said:

What the hell is the point of buying unfinished tools. 

I didn't know these were so thick at the tips. Luckily I have some tools to grind some steel off if I need, so no big deal.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been playing with a NH35 movement that which has the classic Etachron regulation system and a few balance assemblies as practice. What I’m trying to do is get comfortable with the effect both the stud and regulator pin positions have on rate and positional error. When I install a new balance assembly I install it with the assembly in place  on the cock and cock is attached to base plate. I use the back of the tweezers to push the stud into place and feel the click. However, I noticed that the angle of the stud can be adjusted and what I also noticed is that some movements have the stud carrier arm bent down a little and that changes the angle of the hairspring leaving the stud. This angle effects how the spring goes through the regulator pins and also the spacing of the coils opposite the stud. What I thought I was supposed to do is set the regulator block in the middle of the curve, open the pins, and use the stud angle to center the spring.  Then the stud is set.  Now on all the new NH movements I have seen the angle of the regulator block is about 60 degrees counter clockwise from full open. I watched a video where the author used the regulator pin adjust to adjust rate and position error. When I close down the pins I do notice that the rate increases but also the amplitude drops, the coil spacing changes and hairspring appears slight straighter between the stud and the regulator block. If I open the pins the amplitude comes back, the spring breathes a bit more between the stud and the regulator block and the rate slows.  So, a long post I know but I would really appreciate any advice on how to correctly adjust the etachron system for rate, amplitude and positional error.   
    • Aw come on Andy, it was just a comparison between spending 30 quid and tackling a tricky piece of work. You appeared to be volunteering,  i volunteer for stuff all the time it gets me into all kinds of trouble.
    • It's not really shown here , but the blade flips over, so it faces the other way. The knob and threaded case holder then pushes the caseback seam into the blade. Once the blade starts to penetrate into it, the lever and blade are lifted , which should hopefully pop the back off. A lot of fashion style cases have very tight seams and need a sharp blade to start separating them.  Don't buy the cheaper plastic versions of this tool, the posts with the pins through for blade holder break easily if the apply extra force to blade. 
    • You will still be looking for a balance complete I’m afraid, this is the balance staff, balance wheel and hairspring in one package. Hairspring and the balance wheel are matched in the factory. Whilst we can change a balance staff the hairspring and balance wheel stay together.   Tom
    • The hairspring end has come adrift from the small terminal barrel.  I have tried to remove the taper pin to relocate it, but the task is beyond my skill set, eyes, hands and being in my 70s, probably beyond my life expectancy.  It is not too badly mangled on the end.  On the ebay offer, that really is a bit on the rich side.  I'll keep looking, maybe a good hairspring will turn up with a shot balance staff. As for time spent on knees.  I made up one of these from 3M magnetic tape and a piece of wood.  It works well for magnetic parts. Other things I have suffered with.  I found lubricants so very expensive that I bought some very small syringes and tiny needles.  I just decant a drop into my oiling pots when I start a movement and the remainder keeps really well in the syringes. Finally identifying the correct screw for the part led me to make up the board in the final pic.   Thanks for the info. Kind regards   Chris  
×
×
  • Create New...