Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi. Thanks for letting me join.

I have a small collection of classic watches. One of them is a rolex oysterdate which I have owned from new purchased 36 years ago! I had it serviced last year and since then the second hand has "skipped". I was told it was due to a spring which was incorrectly tensioned. I returned it to the repairer but it has not been fixed. I would appreciate any advice re. Repair.

Thanks.

Posted (edited)

Hi Daisy, 

The diagnosis is most likely correct: there's a spring that puts a tiny bit of tension on the seconds pinion (which holds the seconds hand). 

If that spring is too loose, badly placed, or even missing, the second hand will skip. 

A skilled watchmaker should be able to fix this easily. 

Cheers

PS: See picture. This is a Rolex calibre 1225, you may have this or a similar movement in your Oysterdate. The spring is surrounded in green, the red arrow points at seconds pinion. 

Screenshot_20240718_213042_Chrome.thumb.jpg.1f4a47dab2bfe4ea9d35ebe9fbf9993d.jpg

Edited by Knebo
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Daisy said:

Hi. Thanks for letting me join.

I have a small collection of classic watches. One of them is a rolex oysterdate which I have owned from new purchased 36 years ago! I had it serviced last year and since then the second hand has "skipped". I was told it was due to a spring which was incorrectly tensioned. I returned it to the repairer but it has not been fixed. I would appreciate any advice re. Repair.

Thanks.

Hi Daisy welcome, with the information you've provided from the previous repair guy this sounds very much like the short flat spring that keeps the sweep seconds pinion engaged with the indirect sweep wheel.  Without the correct spring tension the second hand can stutter, the arbor that the hand connects to has too much free play so the pinion leaves and wheel teeth do no remain constantly meshed.

Haha you beat me to it matey and with a picture 👍

Ps just be careful with your outlining in future if that spring had 2 fixing locations then............i need say no more 😅

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
On 7/18/2024 at 8:55 PM, Nucejoe said:

Does it also skip in dial down position ?

 

Welcome to the WRT forum.

 

 

To be honest I have never looked

Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, Daisy said:

To be honest I have never looked

Skip indicates the minute drive wheel and sweep pinion's  failure to engage. 

 Providing other involved parts are undamaged, tension spring  ( if intact) is a easy and inexpensive fix, so I wonder, repair might  have been labour extensive which can explain why the  repairman decided to return your watch unrepaired. 

We need to see a pic ( focused on centre)  of the movement , like the one knebo showed above, then a few simple  tests that  you can do, helps decide if  you should  personally attempt the repair.

Rgds 

 

 

Edited by Nucejoe
correction
  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/20/2024 at 6:02 PM, Nucejoe said:

Skip indicates the minute drive wheel and sweep pinion's  failure to engage. 

 Providing other involved parts are undamaged, tension spring  ( if intact) is a easy and inexpensive fix, so I wonder, repair might  have been labour extensive which can explain why the  repairman decided to return your watch unrepaired. 

We need to see a pic ( focused on centre)  of the movement , like the one knebo showed above, then a few simple  tests that  you can do, helps decide if  you should  personally attempt the repair.

Rgds 

 

 

 

Posted

Hi. Thanks for getting back to me. As someone advised I turned the watch face down and the second hand doesn't stutter in that position! I guess that's a sign that it is insufficient tension on the pinion. I am waiting for a case opening tool (rubber ball) to arrive in order to have a look. 

Thanks again.

Posted
On 7/18/2024 at 8:55 PM, Nucejoe said:

Does it also skip in dial down position ?

 

Welcome to the WRT forum.

 

 

I JUST CHECKED IT AND THE SECOND HAND DOES NOT STUTTER IN THE FACE DOWN POSITION! I GUESS IT IS THE SPRING. THANKS FOR THE ADVICE.

Posted
4 hours ago, Daisy said:

I JUST CHECKED IT AND THE SECOND HAND DOES NOT STUTTER IN THE FACE DOWN POSITION! I GUESS IT IS THE SPRING. THANKS FOR THE ADVICE.

So, in all likelihood its an issue with tension spring on sweep pinion, inexpensive  easy fix.  

Rgds

 

Posted

@Daisy, if you intend to fix this yourself, just be very careful and make sure you have a screwdriver that properly fits the screw. You can use sand paper to sharpen or broaden the tip. If it's not a perfect fit, you are likely to slip. And if you slip, your screwdriver can easily end up in the balance. Then you could be looking at hundreds of dollars for a replacement.

 

Posted
On 7/24/2024 at 1:30 PM, Daisy said:

…I am waiting for a case opening tool (rubber ball) to arrive in order to have a look…

Don‘t be too disappointed if the rubber ball does not work. You will most likely need the proper wrench for your specific Rolex in order to apply enough torque.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 7/20/2024 at 4:05 PM, Daisy said:

To be honest I have never looked

I am pleased to say that thanks to the help from this group and a new spring I have managed to fix my Rolex.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 7/25/2024 at 6:37 PM, Kalanag said:

Don‘t be too disappointed if the rubber ball does not work. You will most likely need the proper wrench for your specific Rolex in order to apply enough torque.

Pleased to say the rubber ball worked and I have fixed my watch.

  • Like 3
Posted
13 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Well done Daisy,  first repair under your belt ?

Yes and it was a bit nerve wracking!

  • Like 2
Posted

Sorry I have just picked up on this post. The watch should be returned to the repairer to rectify the fault.  Opening the watch again will nullify any warranty offered by the repairer. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been playing with a NH35 movement that which has the classic Etachron regulation system and a few balance assemblies as practice. What I’m trying to do is get comfortable with the effect both the stud and regulator pin positions have on rate and positional error. When I install a new balance assembly I install it with the assembly in place  on the cock and cock is attached to base plate. I use the back of the tweezers to push the stud into place and feel the click. However, I noticed that the angle of the stud can be adjusted and what I also noticed is that some movements have the stud carrier arm bent down a little and that changes the angle of the hairspring leaving the stud. This angle effects how the spring goes through the regulator pins and also the spacing of the coils opposite the stud. What I thought I was supposed to do is set the regulator block in the middle of the curve, open the pins, and use the stud angle to center the spring.  Then the stud is set.  Now on all the new NH movements I have seen the angle of the regulator block is about 60 degrees counter clockwise from full open. I watched a video where the author used the regulator pin adjust to adjust rate and position error. When I close down the pins I do notice that the rate increases but also the amplitude drops, the coil spacing changes and hairspring appears slight straighter between the stud and the regulator block. If I open the pins the amplitude comes back, the spring breathes a bit more between the stud and the regulator block and the rate slows.  So, a long post I know but I would really appreciate any advice on how to correctly adjust the etachron system for rate, amplitude and positional error.   
    • Aw come on Andy, it was just a comparison between spending 30 quid and tackling a tricky piece of work. You appeared to be volunteering,  i volunteer for stuff all the time it gets me into all kinds of trouble.
    • It's not really shown here , but the blade flips over, so it faces the other way. The knob and threaded case holder then pushes the caseback seam into the blade. Once the blade starts to penetrate into it, the lever and blade are lifted , which should hopefully pop the back off. A lot of fashion style cases have very tight seams and need a sharp blade to start separating them.  Don't buy the cheaper plastic versions of this tool, the posts with the pins through for blade holder break easily if the apply extra force to blade. 
    • You will still be looking for a balance complete I’m afraid, this is the balance staff, balance wheel and hairspring in one package. Hairspring and the balance wheel are matched in the factory. Whilst we can change a balance staff the hairspring and balance wheel stay together.   Tom
    • The hairspring end has come adrift from the small terminal barrel.  I have tried to remove the taper pin to relocate it, but the task is beyond my skill set, eyes, hands and being in my 70s, probably beyond my life expectancy.  It is not too badly mangled on the end.  On the ebay offer, that really is a bit on the rich side.  I'll keep looking, maybe a good hairspring will turn up with a shot balance staff. As for time spent on knees.  I made up one of these from 3M magnetic tape and a piece of wood.  It works well for magnetic parts. Other things I have suffered with.  I found lubricants so very expensive that I bought some very small syringes and tiny needles.  I just decant a drop into my oiling pots when I start a movement and the remainder keeps really well in the syringes. Finally identifying the correct screw for the part led me to make up the board in the final pic.   Thanks for the info. Kind regards   Chris  
×
×
  • Create New...