Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a crown that had an o-ring down inside the crown.  The o-ring was dried and brittle and in pieces.  I got it all out, but need to figure out what an appropriate sized replacement would be.  The crown tube outer diameter is 2.5mm.  I assume that the inner diameter of the o-ring should be slightly smaller than that, but just how much smaller?

Posted

I guess you have to get an assorted o-ring set and trial and error it.

-9387731521332966294.thumb.jpg.d70a5228a9e52f15b14fe375200f0833.jpg

I got one of these tools from AliExpress recently and found that it works much better that the homemade one I made by grinding an opening it the eye of a large sewing needle.

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I guess you have to get an assorted o-ring set and trial and error it.

-9387731521332966294.thumb.jpg.d70a5228a9e52f15b14fe375200f0833.jpg

I got one of these tools from AliExpress recently and found that it works much better that the homemade one I made by grinding an opening it the eye of a large sewing needle.

Do you have a link for that?  I was trying to use a cheap oiler to get out the fragments.  Wasn't working very well.

 

10 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

Is this from a branded watch and if so, which one?

What's the ID of the crown?

As always photos would help.

It is from an Elgin with an AS 1902 movement.  Diameter of the crown opening is 2.7 mm.

20240721_112541.jpg

Edited by gpraceman
Posted (edited)

So the crown tube is 2.5mm and the opening is 2.7mm which means there's no way you'll get another o-ring back in.

Check out the link below.

https://adventuresinamateurwatchfettling.com/2015/10/12/crown-revival-seiko-6105-and-62mas-crown-gasket-replacement/

Edit

Is that photo before you removed the old o-ring?

Double Edit

Just realised the 2.5mm is the pendant tube so you'll be looking around 2.4mm
but will also need to know the O/D so it sits in the crown correctly

Edited by AndyGSi
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

So the crown tube is 2.5mm and the opening is 2.7mm which means there's no way you'll get another o-ring back in.

Check out the link below.

https://adventuresinamateurwatchfettling.com/2015/10/12/crown-revival-seiko-6105-and-62mas-crown-gasket-replacement/

Edit

Is that photo before you removed the old o-ring?

Double Edit

Just realised the 2.5mm is the pendant tube so you'll be looking around 2.4mm
but will also need to know the O/D so it sits in the crown correctly

Actually, that photo is after removing the old o-ring and putting in a new one.  But new o-ring is 2.5 mm ID and the fit on the pendant tube just seems too loose.  However, getting that o-ring out will likely be difficult, so I may just have to live with it and learn for the next time around.

How to determine the proper OD of the o-ring?  I can approximate it based on outward appearance of the crown.

5 minutes ago, HectorLooi said:

How well does it work to pull one out?

Edited by gpraceman
Posted
1 minute ago, gpraceman said:

How well does it work to pull one out?

If the oring is new and supple, this tool can pull it out very easily without any damage to the oring or crown.

But if the oring is hard and brittle, the only way is to soak it in acetone until you get a black goop and scoop it out with an oiler.

  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, gpraceman said:

How to determine the proper OD of the o-ring?  I can approximate it based on outward appearance of the crown.

I've only ever split the crown down and then measure it's ID to determine the o-ring size.

If you don't want to do that and can get a replacement in then you can measure the join of the washer to the crown.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been playing with a NH35 movement that which has the classic Etachron regulation system and a few balance assemblies as practice. What I’m trying to do is get comfortable with the effect both the stud and regulator pin positions have on rate and positional error. When I install a new balance assembly I install it with the assembly in place  on the cock and cock is attached to base plate. I use the back of the tweezers to push the stud into place and feel the click. However, I noticed that the angle of the stud can be adjusted and what I also noticed is that some movements have the stud carrier arm bent down a little and that changes the angle of the hairspring leaving the stud. This angle effects how the spring goes through the regulator pins and also the spacing of the coils opposite the stud. What I thought I was supposed to do is set the regulator block in the middle of the curve, open the pins, and use the stud angle to center the spring.  Then the stud is set.  Now on all the new NH movements I have seen the angle of the regulator block is about 60 degrees counter clockwise from full open. I watched a video where the author used the regulator pin adjust to adjust rate and position error. When I close down the pins I do notice that the rate increases but also the amplitude drops, the coil spacing changes and hairspring appears slight straighter between the stud and the regulator block. If I open the pins the amplitude comes back, the spring breathes a bit more between the stud and the regulator block and the rate slows.  So, a long post I know but I would really appreciate any advice on how to correctly adjust the etachron system for rate, amplitude and positional error.   
    • Aw come on Andy, it was just a comparison between spending 30 quid and tackling a tricky piece of work. You appeared to be volunteering,  i volunteer for stuff all the time it gets me into all kinds of trouble.
    • It's not really shown here , but the blade flips over, so it faces the other way. The knob and threaded case holder then pushes the caseback seam into the blade. Once the blade starts to penetrate into it, the lever and blade are lifted , which should hopefully pop the back off. A lot of fashion style cases have very tight seams and need a sharp blade to start separating them.  Don't buy the cheaper plastic versions of this tool, the posts with the pins through for blade holder break easily if the apply extra force to blade. 
    • You will still be looking for a balance complete I’m afraid, this is the balance staff, balance wheel and hairspring in one package. Hairspring and the balance wheel are matched in the factory. Whilst we can change a balance staff the hairspring and balance wheel stay together.   Tom
    • The hairspring end has come adrift from the small terminal barrel.  I have tried to remove the taper pin to relocate it, but the task is beyond my skill set, eyes, hands and being in my 70s, probably beyond my life expectancy.  It is not too badly mangled on the end.  On the ebay offer, that really is a bit on the rich side.  I'll keep looking, maybe a good hairspring will turn up with a shot balance staff. As for time spent on knees.  I made up one of these from 3M magnetic tape and a piece of wood.  It works well for magnetic parts. Other things I have suffered with.  I found lubricants so very expensive that I bought some very small syringes and tiny needles.  I just decant a drop into my oiling pots when I start a movement and the remainder keeps really well in the syringes. Finally identifying the correct screw for the part led me to make up the board in the final pic.   Thanks for the info. Kind regards   Chris  
×
×
  • Create New...