Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A friend has asked me to look at her Omega watch saying that it seems to keep stopping. It runs to time on the bench for 12-13 hours: is this a normal power reserve for this size/type of watch? (it's 2cm+ diameter but no indications of the model are visible - I daren't try opening it as it looks like it needs a proprietary tool to do so)

20240722_173353.jpg

20240722_173330.jpg

Posted

Yes, Jaxa tool or the rubber ball. 

Calibre 630 seems plausible. I recently fixed a 625 (similar to 630, but without centre seconds) and the size/design are similar. 

12-13 hours isn't enough, without question. The cal 630 should do 30h and I believe that's pretty much the lowest you'll find. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 7/22/2024 at 5:49 PM, RichardHarris123 said:

We need the caliber to know the power reserve.  If you're not willing to open it, how can you help her?

At this stage I think I can best help her by not opening it (I don't want to scratch the back for a start !) & passing on the advice on offer here!

On 7/22/2024 at 7:14 PM, Nucejoe said:

Jax tool would work just spread a plastic sheet on the case back.

Perhaps cal 630.

Twelve to thirteen hours power reserve is low.

Thanks, that's helpful.

Posted
On 7/22/2024 at 7:14 PM, Nucejoe said:

Jax tool would work just spread a plastic sheet on the case back.

Perhaps cal 630.

Twelve to thirteen hours power reserve is low.

Thanks, that's helpful.

In parallel with seeking advice - and thanks for all the responses - I've been recording the watch power reserve each time I've wound it and over 5 days that has doubled from ~ 13 hours to 26 hours, presumably as the watch has 'run in', it not having been used for some time. During this monitoring period I was thinking a new mainspring might be required but I think the fact that it now runs for more than a day might makes it once again a practical timepiece for my friend.

Posted
1 hour ago, dnhb said:

I've been recording the watch power reserve each time I've wound it and over 5 days that has doubled from ~ 13 hours to 26 hours, presumably as the watch has 'run in', it not having been used for some time. 

Sounds like it needs a service.

1 hour ago, dnhb said:

During this monitoring period I was thinking a new mainspring might be required 

You don't usually need to change the mainspring.  I'm currently testing a cal 625 I just serviced. The hairspring looked a little 'tired' in the centre coils, but I thought I'd try it.  It's giving a healthy 290° amplitude (240° after 24h) and power reserve of about 40h (spec is 30h). 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 7/27/2024 at 5:14 PM, mikepilk said:

Sounds like it needs a service.

You don't usually need to change the mainspring.  I'm currently testing a cal 625 I just serviced. The hairspring looked a little 'tired' in the centre coils, but I thought I'd try it.  It's giving a healthy 290° amplitude (240° after 24h) and power reserve of about 40h (spec is 30h). 

The fact is I'm at a very early stage in my Watch/Clock tinkering and don't have the confidence to address a relatively high-end marque that isn't mine when it can be 'improved' sufficiently without any risky intervention. The owner now feels that the watch is a practical timepiece for her as I've shown it didn't just 'stop running' randomly & was thus unreliable which had been her impression leading to it being unused for some time & why she asked if I could do anything to help. I will, however, pass on your comment that it could nonetheless do with a service. 

Posted
3 hours ago, dnhb said:

The fact is I'm at a very early stage in my Watch/Clock tinkering and don't have the confidence to address a relatively high-end marque

Wise words. So many think it will be easy, and end up damaging nice watches (despite warnings). The Omega 620/625 are nice simple movements, but just their small size makes them fiddly for beginners. Good luck with your tinkering. One day you will have no problem servicing such movements.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ve been playing with a NH35 movement that which has the classic Etachron regulation system and a few balance assemblies as practice. What I’m trying to do is get comfortable with the effect both the stud and regulator pin positions have on rate and positional error. When I install a new balance assembly I install it with the assembly in place  on the cock and cock is attached to base plate. I use the back of the tweezers to push the stud into place and feel the click. However, I noticed that the angle of the stud can be adjusted and what I also noticed is that some movements have the stud carrier arm bent down a little and that changes the angle of the hairspring leaving the stud. This angle effects how the spring goes through the regulator pins and also the spacing of the coils opposite the stud. What I thought I was supposed to do is set the regulator block in the middle of the curve, open the pins, and use the stud angle to center the spring.  Then the stud is set.  Now on all the new NH movements I have seen the angle of the regulator block is about 60 degrees counter clockwise from full open. I watched a video where the author used the regulator pin adjust to adjust rate and position error. When I close down the pins I do notice that the rate increases but also the amplitude drops, the coil spacing changes and hairspring appears slight straighter between the stud and the regulator block. If I open the pins the amplitude comes back, the spring breathes a bit more between the stud and the regulator block and the rate slows.  So, a long post I know but I would really appreciate any advice on how to correctly adjust the etachron system for rate, amplitude and positional error.   
    • Aw come on Andy, it was just a comparison between spending 30 quid and tackling a tricky piece of work. You appeared to be volunteering,  i volunteer for stuff all the time it gets me into all kinds of trouble.
    • It's not really shown here , but the blade flips over, so it faces the other way. The knob and threaded case holder then pushes the caseback seam into the blade. Once the blade starts to penetrate into it, the lever and blade are lifted , which should hopefully pop the back off. A lot of fashion style cases have very tight seams and need a sharp blade to start separating them.  Don't buy the cheaper plastic versions of this tool, the posts with the pins through for blade holder break easily if the apply extra force to blade. 
    • You will still be looking for a balance complete I’m afraid, this is the balance staff, balance wheel and hairspring in one package. Hairspring and the balance wheel are matched in the factory. Whilst we can change a balance staff the hairspring and balance wheel stay together.   Tom
    • The hairspring end has come adrift from the small terminal barrel.  I have tried to remove the taper pin to relocate it, but the task is beyond my skill set, eyes, hands and being in my 70s, probably beyond my life expectancy.  It is not too badly mangled on the end.  On the ebay offer, that really is a bit on the rich side.  I'll keep looking, maybe a good hairspring will turn up with a shot balance staff. As for time spent on knees.  I made up one of these from 3M magnetic tape and a piece of wood.  It works well for magnetic parts. Other things I have suffered with.  I found lubricants so very expensive that I bought some very small syringes and tiny needles.  I just decant a drop into my oiling pots when I start a movement and the remainder keeps really well in the syringes. Finally identifying the correct screw for the part led me to make up the board in the final pic.   Thanks for the info. Kind regards   Chris  
×
×
  • Create New...