Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know the term "frankenwatch" is used as a bad term to describe changing watch parts with others to maybe fool a future buyer.

It usually is a bad thing, right?

On the other hand, if I change the bezel, it's called "modding" 🤨

In my particular case, I'll be using a standard Seiko 6309, beautiful case, sporty with a classy, very comfy stock bracelet. Everything original.

Now, I have a spare 6349 movement that works pretty well. By exchanging the movements, I'll turn the watch into something unique, but, in the eyes of many, also a frankenwatch.

To be fair, I'll upgrade a stock watch into something, theorically, better.

People do this all the time in cars, for example, why is this a problem for some when it comes to watches?

Posted

On a personal note it's something I would avoid at all cost but I only see this as a real problem when someone is trying to pass something off that it isn't.

I presume you don't have the original 6309 to repair as a lot of the parts are interchangeable with the 6349.

 

Posted

Many will want in your case a genuine Seiko. If you go about doing what you want that is entirely up to you, but Seiko collectors will only go for the rear genuine ones from Seiko catalogues. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, BFernandes said:

People do this all the time in cars, for example, why is this a problem for some when it comes to watches?

Not people who collect classic cars. My boss collects, among other models, Chevy Corvettes. The wrong set of wheels or tailpipe on an otherwise original $250,000.00 car can make it worth less than half that to a collector. Tires, brakes, belts, etc. are all considered replaceable. 

Same with your Seiko. You can replace the gaskets, crystal* and mainspring without issue, but a barrel or balance could raise an eyebrow while the entire movement would clearly be a cardinal sin.

If your intention is to have a better functioning timepiece, the go for it. If you want a collectible, the change as little as possible. It would probably be worth more in a non-running condition with original parts than if it was running with a better movement. 

The "why" part I'll leave to philosophers and sages.  

 

 

* as long as the crystal is NOS from Seiko.

Edited by eccentric59
Posted
3 hours ago, BFernandes said:

I know the term "frankenwatch" is used as a bad term to describe changing watch parts with others to maybe fool a future buyer.

It usually is a bad thing, right?

On the other hand, if I change the bezel, it's called "modding" 🤨

In my particular case, I'll be using a standard Seiko 6309, beautiful case, sporty with a classy, very comfy stock bracelet. Everything original.

Now, I have a spare 6349 movement that works pretty well. By exchanging the movements, I'll turn the watch into something unique, but, in the eyes of many, also a frankenwatch.

To be fair, I'll upgrade a stock watch into something, theorically, better.

People do this all the time in cars, for example, why is this a problem for some when it comes to watches?

You are comparing unique to original, there are collectors that enjoy both ends of the scale but generally a collector wants to have something exactly as it was made at the factory. I prefer originality and everyone is different, its what makes you happy that counts, i dont buy into what makes other folk happy.

Posted (edited)

There's debate about what a frankenwatch is- I've seen professionals call certain factory original Rolex watches Frankens because they have unique Rolex movements (I'd have to go look up which ref they are). Mods are mods, but if you swap out for a different  movement and like it, congrats Dr. Frankenstein...

...I have no issue with Seiko frankens. Original parts are such crap or crap expensive its the only way to keep some of these classics alive. My first and possibly last foray in to Seiko taught me the expensive way...

The nieces and nephews and their SOs in my family will all be receiving a rehajm restored vintage watch for their birth day this year. the first goes out in a couple weeks, which is a Seiko Full Franken...

IMG_1951.thumb.jpeg.ea4b74e38d393e1276fc9662c1fe10ee.jpeg

The nephew is a large fellow what enjoys a a few pints so this is perfect- indestructible and not a huge loss if it isn't. He will be recieving an education on what a Frankenwatch is and instructions to speak with uncle rehajm if he needs liquidity and wants to sell...

Edited by rehajm
  • Like 2
Posted

Franken? To me. Not.

My personal thought on a Franken watch, of which I have quite few, due to my lack of purchase price. 

Parts missing, wrong parts, broken parts, wrong screws, incorrect backs, wrong crown. All these I have. I'm working my way through them with replacement donors. If, when I get them running, they will have been Franken, but will then be part of my collection of 'watches'.

Different views for different people.

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alex mentions the coils below the stud should remain the same as you move the regulator block along the terminal curve.  Mine do that. What he doesn’t discuss and is used in the other video is how the regulator block is used to adjust rate and positional error.  He also doesn’t mention how opening and closing the pins could and in my case does, alter amplitude  In Alex’s video once he sets the stud he never adjusts the regulator pins yet every new movement I get have the pins signing closed. 
    • The video I linked above does mention the spacing of the hairspring coils, and the importance of the regulator being able to move through its full range without distorting the hairspring - the terminal curve of the hairspring must be concentric with the regulator pins throughout the regulator’s range.  If you meticulously follow every step in this video, the regulator system should behave as intended, regardless of the brand of the movement.  Best Regards, Mark
    • Hi friends! My mother got a bunch of old watches from a horologist who was retiring, and he subsequently passed away. It's been in her studio for years, and she showed it to me today and I just fell in love with it. Sadly, I don't know a darn thing about it yet. It's quite old, or at least seems to be. It has two winding arbors, but the key is missing. The crystal appears to be some kind of yellowed plastic, which is odd- I think it was replaced at some point to possibly protect it or something. If I had to guess, it's from the mid-19th century, given that it has no keyless works and that it says "Anchor Escapement" in French. It looks to be about 18 ligne, and the case fob is positioned in the upper right corner. The face is missing the dial, the hands, and a couple of the wheels that drive the hands- I think. But the movement itself seems to be in excellent shape. The serial number on the movement matches the number on the case- it's stamped on the movement and on the case in two places. I haven't started any disassembly yet, but I'm wondering if anyone can give me some idea of what kind of movement it is, and where I might look to see what parts are missing from the face. i may even have a dial that would fit it. It's in good enough shape that I think I could get it running, assuming I could find the missing parts. Any insights are vastly appreciated and thank you! Addendum: The inside of the case has some *very* tiny scratched numbers and letters in it, but I am having an extremely hard time seeing what they are. Like "N 99" and "No192X", They were clearly done with some kind of sharp stylus and maybe they mean when it was serviced or by who? Addendum the second: At least one of the scratches seems to say "N1921X" or maybe "W1921X". Serviced in 1921? And the inside lid of the case has the letters R H with a star between them, and a very tiny mark that says "ARGENT" in a u-shape.
    • I’ve watched every video I can find on YouTube. Some of the info is contradictory and none mention  the effect on amplitude or spring coil spacing which I observed. I was hoping someone here is a Seiko expert and knows these inside out.   
    • This video explains how to set up and adjust the etachron regulator :   I hope that helps, Mark
×
×
  • Create New...